+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 21 of 21
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Critique of New Photographic Process

  1. #16
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    2,226
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    356 times
    I have not seen that book, actually. I may need to check it out.

    I am a little bit off from a real test. I don't want to mix chemicals until I am sure that the emulsion is stable, the unhardened areas will melt away and transfer - I am a bit worried about the gelatin baking in - and then if the hardened gelatin will resist transfer. If all these tests come back positive, I'll try a negative.
    everything is new and nothing has ever been done before - richard rorty

  2. # ADS

  3. #17
    a rush hour soul TPF Editor
    Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    In the mental ward of this forum
    Posts
    18,289
    My Gallery
    (54)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    20 times
    I'm interested in seeing your results, however it turns out. Always fun to experiment, and you seem to know enough to handle your chemistry with care. Simply wearing gloves, being cognizant about ventilation and proper disposal goes a long way.

    Experimentation can lead to amazingly beautiful results. If you don't try, you'll never know what you might get. Good luck!
    Beaten Path Photography
    Site updated at last!

    3) Recognize that if you're not part of the solution, you're likely part of the problem - whatever you perceive it to be.

  4. #18
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    826
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    158 times
    This sounds cool. Is this something you would be able to photograph the entire process? I'd love to see what it's all about.
    Flickr

    Eric

  5. #19
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    2,226
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    356 times
    Sure. I haven't even started my tests, been distracted (mostly here! lol)

    I was planning to document everything here and submit a writeup to AlternativePhotography.com

    I am thinking that with a hot press and suitable pressure, it should be suitable as a general purpose technique. We'll see!
    Last edited by unpopular; 01-13-2012 at 08:42 AM.
    everything is new and nothing has ever been done before - richard rorty

  6. #20
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    2,226
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    356 times
    So I spent the afternoon finally working on this. I was able to produce an non-sensitive plate with a thickness suitable.



    I found that gelatin does readily mix into melted glycerin bar soap, similar in how it mixes with water. It takes a while but it will mix, the key is to not use the microwave to melt the soap, but rather in a double boiler.

    I tried pouring the soap mixture over the plate, but that didn't work so well and came out thick and uneven. I did, however, succeed in transferring this thick layer to paper after it dried to the plate. So I am confident that the transfer will work provided that the hardening does.

    I managed to get a thin layer of soap by rubbing the preparation over the plate - but at that point the pigment too weak. I tried dribbling food color over the plate, and that worked suitably, but I'd prefer the pigment be applied more evenly.

    I'm going to try soaking the plate in ice-cold pigmented ink next, the liquid ink should also even out any faults in the coating. If that doesn't work, I'll just dump tons of pigment into the soap mixture as it's being prepared.
    Derrel and EIngerson like this.
    everything is new and nothing has ever been done before - richard rorty

  7. #21
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    2,226
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    356 times
    I did a quick test with an iron and the above plate. The results were pretty splotchy, but I am impressed by what did transfer. I think with added pressure and time, they're going to be just fine.

    I realized that the excess chromium will need to be washed from the final print. So the print itself will need to be fixed under UV light and finally washed.

    I also washed the plate under cold water, the soap washed away immediately, so I'll need to reconsider how to pigment the plate. I need to get some lampblack or graphite.
    everything is new and nothing has ever been done before - richard rorty


 

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-20-2011, 09:36 AM
  2. Alternative photographic process question?
    By carmelresortinn in forum Photographic Discussions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-10-2010, 10:43 PM
  3. trying out a new process
    By budskiphotography in forum General Gallery
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-13-2010, 08:57 AM
  4. Photo and Post Process Critique
    By CanonSnob in forum General Gallery
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-10-2008, 11:35 PM
  5. to process or not to process
    By enigma in forum The Darkroom
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-03-2003, 02:25 PM