|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TPF Noob!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 18
|
Canon 4400 scanner
I am considering buying this scanner. DPI 4800X9600. Know nothing about scanners. Don`t want my 35mm equipment to go to waste. Anyone out there have experience with this scanner? Would this give me the best of both worlds ... film and digital? I would consider myself to be a notch above "casual shooter". All replys appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Sponsored links
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Western NJ
Posts: 674
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
|
I am considering buying this scanner. DPI 4800X9600. Know nothing about scanners. Don`t want my 35mm equipment to go to waste. Anyone out there have experience with this scanner? Would this give me the best of both worlds ... film and digital? I would consider myself to be a notch above "casual shooter". All replys appreciated.
In any case, I would opt for the extra cost of a film scanner if you had a lot of film to be scanned. They do a much, much better job. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
TPF Noob!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 18
|
Thanks for the reply, Early. It is a flatbed with a slot inside the lid which accepts 35mm negs. There appears to be a light in the lid which would illuminate the negative. The specs read:
Optical Resolution= 4800X9600 dpi Resolution= 16 bit (64K grey levels) 84 bit colour. I`m not looking for large blow-ups. Probably 8X10 max. A dedicated film scanner would be beyond my budget right now. Joe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Western NJ
Posts: 674
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
|
Thanks for the reply, Early. It is a flatbed with a slot inside the lid which accepts 35mm negs. There appears to be a light in the lid which would illuminate the negative. The specs read:
Optical Resolution= 4800X9600 dpi Resolution= 16 bit (64K grey levels) 84 bit colour. I`m not looking for large blow-ups. Probably 8X10 max. A dedicated film scanner would be beyond my budget right now. Joe. I just did some reading up on it, and what I don't like is that it won't do medium format. I'm also partial to Epsons as far as flatbeds go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
No longer a newbie, moving up!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 86
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
|
I have the 8800F, which I guess is the step-up from this scanner. I've been happy with it, so far. I like it because it accepts 35mm, transparencies and medium format, so (almost) all of my bases are covered. A word of caution, though...scanning negs takes a lot longer than scanning prints, so be prepared for some nice logn wait times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
TPF Noob!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 18
|
Thanks for the reply, Lefty. Life was a lot more simple Before Digital. I could get a film camera figured out in five minutes. The manuals that came with my two 35mm`s were thin booklets. The manual for my new A720IS is at least a half inch thick. Now, I read through the different sections in TPF and get more and more confused. Who is right ..... who is wrong? Are scanners and printers a boon or a PITA? Does shooting with a 35mm and scanning give one the best of both worlds? On and on, etc, etc.
I`m goin` for a beer.
__________________
Canon A720IS Nikon EM, 50mm lens Pentax P3n, 28-80, 70-200, 100mm macro/telephoto |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
Advertisement
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | ||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|