|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 984
My Photos Are OK to Edit
|
Can you view a HDR without tone mapping?
How do you, if its even possible, view a HDR without tone mapping? How many stops can our eyes even see? How many stops can a LCD produce? How many stops can a print show? (Basically the range of stops)
__________________
Canon EOS Rebel XTi EF 50mm f/1.4 USM EF-S 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 II EF 75-300mm F/4.0-5.6 III BG-E3 |
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Sponsored links
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Whitstable
Posts: 349
My Photos Are OK to Edit
|
Quote:
How many stops can our eyes even see?
It does vary though, as we can't see them all at once. Our irises make fast adaptations that handle a considerable range but there are slower adaptations of the retinal components that can increase that range still further at the low luminosity end of the range. The dynamic ratio is around 20 stops. The static ratio (i.e. what you can see without making any adjustments) us around 6. This implies that you cannot see the full range of a decent LCD at once. Provided your monitor has 8 bit tables you can ascertain this for yourself by placing adjacent areas of a colour black against a pixel value of 1 in the appropriate channel and adjacent areas with pixel values of 254 and 255. you will not be able to see both differences at once. Quote:
How many stops can a LCD produce?
Quote:
How many stops can a print show? (Basically the range of stops)
Generally less that an LCD, though. Last edited by Moglex; 09-03-2008 at 03:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
a rush hour soul
TPF Editor
**TPF Subscriber** Site Moderator Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In the mental ward of this forum
Posts: 17,309
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
|
I've moved this thread to the Graphics Programs forum due to its technical nature. We'd prefer seeing these types of discussions take place here.
Thanks!
__________________
Beaten Path Photography Site updated at last! 3) Recognize that if you're not part of the solution, you're likely part of the problem - whatever you perceive it to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,177
My Photos Are OK to Edit
|
you can't see all the different exposure levels at once but neither can you see the all the dark and light detail in a RAW image either so it's kind of the same deal.
But yes, can load an HDR image into any of many of the editors that support it and view it. You can even save it with different default "view" levels. Here's a message from another thread that may apply: ================================================== ================ This is an EXR formatted HDR: http://tesselator.gpmod.com/Private_...2_PIZ_hdri.exr Load this into CS3 or another HDR editor (there are many) and select the exposure tool. Load it into Photomatrix and look ad the HDR histogram or use the exposure up/down tool in Photomatrix. ![]() Last edited by Bifurcator; 09-03-2008 at 03:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 984
My Photos Are OK to Edit
|
thanks for input
__________________
Canon EOS Rebel XTi EF 50mm f/1.4 USM EF-S 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 II EF 75-300mm F/4.0-5.6 III BG-E3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hell's Kitchen, New York
Posts: 1,723
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
|
The variation in range is mainly because of the change in reflectivity of the darker areas of the print. You can compare this to sunlit scenes with deep shade - in that case your eyes may be scanning over a scene with a 13-stop brightness range, and your perception is that your eyes can handle it, even though they are not coping with the entire range at one instant. 13 to 14 stops appears to be about the largest range we can appear to see 'at once' (albeit not truly instantaneously). From observation and measurement, I'd estimate the eye's overall dynamic range, allowing for adaptation, to be at least 27 stops and maybe a little more. Best, Helen
__________________
No longer posting. Here's why: link. I'll still be reading PMs from time to time. Some of my snaps are here and here. Last edited by Helen B; 09-03-2008 at 07:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 984
My Photos Are OK to Edit
|
Thanks
__________________
Canon EOS Rebel XTi EF 50mm f/1.4 USM EF-S 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 II EF 75-300mm F/4.0-5.6 III BG-E3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
TPF Noob!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
Posts: 15
My Photos Are OK to Edit
|
Thanks Moglex, Bi and Helen.
I tried the test suggested using paint and creating custom colours and found that only with the greatest difficulty could I detect differences of 1 in the colour values. I got other people to look (including children in case it was age related) and everyone found the same. No one could detect whether or not there were blocks with the smallest possible change (using green) when looking at a whole screen that was half 255/254 and half 0/1. Not a very scientific test but interesting all the same. I also tried checking the range of glossy inkjet prints from unprinted to solid black but could not measure a range greater than 6 stops no matter how the light was angled. I'd love to have some tips for increasing that as it would surely make a lot of photographs a great deal more dramatic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hell's Kitchen, New York
Posts: 1,723
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
|
Good lighting for a print will allow you to get viewing conditions close to the density range that would be measured by a densitometer*, while poor lighting will reduce the apparent density range. This generally means that the print needs to be lit at 45 degrees to the viewing axis with little light arriving from anywhere near to the viewing axis, so that there are no specular reflections. In general I find that the greater the density range of a glossy print, the more important is the lighting. Matte prints, though they have a lower measured density range, appear to be more able to hold up in poor lighting because the high density is less reliant on lighting angle - the blacks are velvety.
A 6-stop density range is at the low end of what can be expected from a glossy inkjet print. What paper and ink/printer were you using, and how were you measuring the range? Edit: Doing a 0/1 - 254/255 test is quite demanding on the monitor and monitor profile - the contrast between 0 and 1, and 254 and 255 is not a fixed value and it is affected by the monitor contrast range and the monitor profile. An alternative method for the simultaneous contrast test might be to start with pairs of values that are discernible when they are the sole values displayed, then make the test screen with the two pairs to see if they are simultaneously discernible. If anyone wants a test file with all 256 values arranged so that value x can be compared to values 1, 2, 3 and 4 away (and which can, of course, be cropped to show a limited range or set of ranges) I will try to make it available on here, or email it. Best, Helen *Typically a reflection densitometer reads at exactly 45 degrees to the axis of illumination - either the illumination is in a ring at 45 degrees to the measurement cell which is at right angles to the print - the typical Macbeth (sic) arrangement - or vice-versa.
__________________
No longer posting. Here's why: link. I'll still be reading PMs from time to time. Some of my snaps are here and here. Last edited by Helen B; 09-04-2008 at 07:06 AM. Reason: Added note about LCD tests. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
TPF Noob!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 18
My Photos Are OK to Edit
|
You can compare this to sunlit scenes with deep shade - in that case your eyes may be scanning over a scene with a 13-stop brightness range, and your perception is that your eyes can handle it, even though they are not coping with the entire range at one instant. 13 to 14 stops appears to be about the largest range we can appear to see 'at once' (albeit not truly instantaneously).
Best, Helen Note that all we have to do is "scan the scene with our eyes" and they automatically adjust to see what we are looking at. We don't even have to think about it. If we look at the bright sunlit part, our pupils (aperature) automatically adjust to see it in proper exposure. Then when we gaze at the deep shadows, we magically see the detail. Our eyes are amazing contraptions...says a lot about the God who designed them. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
Advertisement
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | ||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|