Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 110
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: D300s or the D700????

  1. #1
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fredericton, NB, Canada
    Posts
    65
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times

    Question D300s or the D700????

    My wife is looking to buy a new camera for her wedding business. Currently I use a D300 and love it. I looked at the specs for both cameras and all I see is that the D700 has a full frame sensor. Someone told her that the D700 is twice as good as the D300 in low light conditions. Is this true?Is a full frame sensor that much better?

    ANY advice is GREATLY appreciated!!



  2. #2
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,475
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1 times
    It's known for superb low light performance if you know how to use it.

    I think if I were a wedding photographer the D700 would be my first choice, if I could afford it and had the lenses to make it happen.

    That said, I'm talking out of my butt with no real world experience - only dreams of 'some day'.

    Here's one cool site to compare cameras:
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sidebyside.asp

    And another to compare photos from different cameras:
    http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM

    D300 on the (first) vs D700 (second) at 6400 ISO




    Just for giggles, D700 at 24,600 ISO - just WOW!
    Last edited by PhotoXopher; 09-09-2009 at 01:17 PM.
    I am the french fry in a box of onion rings.

  3. #3
    Dao
    Dao is offline
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    5,857
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    331 times
    I will agree with N0YZE. If cost is not an issue, I will go with D700 for sure. And D300 as the backup.

  4. #4
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,167
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    D300s = Professional
    D700 = Prosumer

    If I was a working wedding photographer I would go with the D300s or D3. Period.
    This

  5. #5
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,475
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1 times
    Uh oh, there's that can of worms... and it's been opened!
    I am the french fry in a box of onion rings.

  6. #6
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,167
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    lol. I knew it would probably cause a ****storm

    I realize this technology didn't always exist but if I were shooting a wedding there's no way I would use a camera that didn't have dual cards.
    Memory cards are thousands of times more likely to fail than anything else in your bag. People bring backup bodies but write to a single card? Doesn't make sense.
    This

  7. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,167
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    Let me add this on a more serious note. When making money of your gear you have to take into account are you getting out of this camera what you put in? Do you need the expanded ISO capability of the D700? Obviously not. When looking at the the DSLR comparison chart on Nikon's site the D700 looks like it would be more appropriately placed next to the D90. The only thing that keeps it out of that bracket is the full metal body, weather sealing and ISO capabilities. But when looking across the board it's specs don't line up with the rest of the professional lineup. The D3x, D3 and D300s all have basically the same specs. The D700 is a notch down in basically the same categories as the D90.

    That being said. I really don't see how someone could plop down almost $3000 when you can get a more functional camera for almost 1/2 the cost. Especially when you're making money off of it. Now, if full frame and expanded ISO is a must for you, then by all means that extra $1000 may make it worth it.
    This

  8. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,381
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    32 times
    Quote Originally Posted by itznfb View Post
    D300s = Professional
    D700 = Prosumer

    If I was a working wedding photographer I would go with the D300s or D3. Period.

    What are you talking about? Your trying to say a full frame camera is not pro, but a cropped sensor camera is? uhhhh.

    Nikon, fast primes, and speedlights.


  9. #9
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,475
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1 times
    Full frame vs crop has nothing to do with rating a camera pro, prosumer, or beginner.

    I always believed Nikon's methodology on this was:

    DX = Pro (D1, D2, D3)
    DXXX = Prosumer (D100, D200, D300)
    DXX = Consumer (D70, D80, D90)

    Now we have to add:
    DXXXX = Entry Level (D3000, D5000)
    I am the french fry in a box of onion rings.

  10. #10
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The Great White North
    Posts
    353
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    thats a pretty bold statement to make

    "d300 = professional
    d700 = prosumer"

    Many well established photography review websites and professionals would disagree with you and order things the other way.

    If the D300s didn't come with dual writing capability would it still be a professional camera?
    With rumors of a new D700s on the horizon, with the same capability as that which now comes in the D300s (dual writing and HD video) does that make it professional?

    As far as performance goes both the D700 and the D300s are very capable cameras. The d700 however has the same sensor and many of the same characteristics of that found in the pro level D3 camera.

    To claim that one camera is more "functional" than the other is also a little misleading. More functional how so? If all you are shooting is low light things is a d300s really more functional?

    If you want to shoot HD video then sure the D300s is FAAAAR more capable. My point is dont be so quick to paint everything with the same brush. What sounds like it works for you, may not work for the next guy in line.

  11. #11
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sunny South Florida
    Posts
    2,093
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1 times
    d700 definitely.

  12. #12
    DWS
    DWS is offline
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    118
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times

  13. #13
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    13,248
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1703 times



    The Liver is Evil and Must Be Punished.
    Shooter of FX, DX and MFT

  14. #14
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,692
    My Gallery
    (10)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2 times
    Another vote for the D700.

  15. #15
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,167
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    Quote Originally Posted by DScience View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by itznfb View Post
    D300s = Professional
    D700 = Prosumer

    If I was a working wedding photographer I would go with the D300s or D3. Period.

    What are you talking about? Your trying to say a full frame camera is not pro, but a cropped sensor camera is? uhhhh.
    Yea.... as NOYZE said, the sensor size is irrelevant to it's classification as pro/notpro.

    Quote Originally Posted by RONDAL View Post
    thats a pretty bold statement to make

    "d300 = professional
    d700 = prosumer"

    Many well established photography review websites and professionals would disagree with you and order things the other way.
    It is a bold statement but in reality the specs from the D700 more align with a D90 than they do a D3. However the specs from the D90 and up are so similar it doesn't take much to change from one level to another.

    Quote Originally Posted by RONDAL View Post
    If the D300s didn't come with dual writing capability would it still be a professional camera?
    In my opinion. No.

    Quote Originally Posted by RONDAL View Post
    With rumors of a new D700s on the horizon, with the same capability as that which now comes in the D300s (dual writing and HD video) does that make it professional?
    You add dual card slots, 100% viewfinder, 6+ fps out of the box... ehg... there's one or two things I'm forgetting... anyway you add those few things and then yes... you've branched out of the prosumer class. Again, this is by no means set in stone anywhere this is my opinion based on what you get out of a camera for how much it costs.

    Quote Originally Posted by RONDAL View Post
    As far as performance goes both the D700 and the D300s are very capable cameras. The d700 however has the same sensor and many of the same characteristics of that found in the pro level D3 camera.

    To claim that one camera is more "functional" than the other is also a little misleading. More functional how so? If all you are shooting is low light things is a d300s really more functional?

    If you want to shoot HD video then sure the D300s is FAAAAR more capable. My point is dont be so quick to paint everything with the same brush. What sounds like it works for you, may not work for the next guy in line.
    Again... if you go by spec for spec the D700 more aligns with the D90 than it does a D3. That is extreme nitpicking so unless you NEED a full frame sensor for some reason I can't fathom how a D700 is worth almost $3000. For an enthusiast with a lot of money... no doubt the D700 is the way to go. But for someone who uses this as an investment and needs to factor ROI... no way. I don't see it.

    I don't factor in HD video when comparing Nikons because the video you get out of the Nikon DSLRs is crap.
    This

 

 
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. What camera to buy (D300s, D700, 7D or 5D Mark II) ?
    By itisgregory in forum Digital Discussion & Q&A
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-10-2011, 08:16 AM
  2. D700 vs. D300s ?? what??
    By Tami in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 12-25-2010, 08:32 AM
  3. Nikon D300s vs D700
    By DirtyDFeckers in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-12-2010, 11:14 PM
  4. D300s vs D700
    By MelissaLaska in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-10-2010, 01:22 PM
  5. WTB: Nikon MB-D10 D300 / D300s / D700 Vertical battery Grip
    By Make7upyours728 in forum Buy and Sell
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-20-2010, 07:41 AM

Search tags for this page

compare d300 wioth d700
,
d300 v d700
,
d300 vs d700
,
d300s v d700
,

d300s vs d700

,
d700 v d300s
,
d700 vs d300
,

d700 vs d300s

,
nikon d300s vs d700
,
nikon d700 vs d300s reviews
Click on a term to search for related topics.