Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 22 of 22
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Camera vs Eye Comparison

  1. #16
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,228
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    1090 times
    It has been argued that reality needs at least one observer. Put two observers together, and we can start arguing which version of reality is "real". Which brings up the parable of the blind men and the elephant...
    Put the important things in important places
    Compose to minimize dead space and things that distract from the center of interest - the important things
    Process to minimize faults and maximize good points.
    by Lew Lorton, aka The_Traveller.

  2. # ADS
    Ads
    Google Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

  3. #17
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Mobile AL
    Posts
    44
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Wow! ISO looks like the best comparison. However, there are other ways to see using the light that is available in the dark. For instance you can use light amplification as in night vision GenX type equipment. Then there is the IR vision. And thermal imaging which is a bit different than IR. and both work though rain and clouds. What about radar (sound waves) to see in the dark? All this is available for a nominal fee, but not real good for quality photos. All these take advantage of some form of energy that is reflected or put off by the subject being observed. Photons, electrons, Protons, RF, IR, UV, whatever. Digital camera sensors don't work like the human eye. But one day they may...

  4. #18
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    164
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    11 times
    The fact that we have two eyes also adds to the superiority over the average camera.

  5. #19
    KmH
    KmH is online now
    Helping photographers learn to fish
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    28,786
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2809 times
    Yep. It's how we process our perception of depth and a 3rd dimension. People who have lost the function of of one eye have problems perceiving depth.

    Note, virtually all earth creatures that have eyes, have 2 of them.

  6. #20
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    6,959
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    1465 times
    ^^ i wonder if there is any effective resolution improvement going on as well. Might the brain process the visual information from either eye in a way that improve our ability to see clearly?
    75% of the internet is wrong. The rest is pornography.

  7. #21
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    78
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    3 times
    The human eye really isn't as great as it could be, seeing how the cones and rods are pointed the wrong way. The image you see is highly processed by the brain, a raw image from the eye at night would be upside down, brighter at the edges(there are more rods on the edges), and have a blind spot in the middle from the nerve bundle going through the retina.

  8. #22
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,708
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    769 times
    Quote Originally Posted by KmH
    Yep. It's how we process our perception of depth and a 3rd dimension. People who have lost the function of of one eye have problems perceiving depth.

    Note, virtually all earth creatures that have eyes, have 2 of them.
    What about arachnids? Do they see into multiple dimensions?
    Indentured Student (and hating it). Hopeful Amateur (and getting better).
    Canon 1D Mark II, Canon 60D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4
    L, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L, Canon EF 100-400mm f/3.5-5.6L, Canon Speedlite 580EX II

    http://www.davevaughn.com

    Tell me what you think. It would mean a lot.

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-31-2012, 03:32 PM
  2. Smart Phone Camera Comparison
    By Gaerek in forum Digital Discussion & Q&A
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-04-2011, 08:14 PM
  3. camera comparison website? what is it again?
    By UUilliam in forum Off Topic Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-21-2010, 12:14 PM
  4. 70-200 f2.8, 1.4TC and 70-300 comparison
    By tirediron in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-10-2009, 10:31 PM
  5. camera resolution comparison
    By 10101 in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-27-2004, 05:52 PM

Search tags for this page

camera and eye comparison
,
camera versus eye
,
camera versus the eye
,

camera vs eye

,
camera vs eyes
,
camera vs the eye
,
camera vs. eye
,
cones directly sense r g b
,
digital camera vs the eye
,
eye vs. camera
,
eyes and camera comparison
,
non digital photography vs eye
,
our eyes versus the digital camera seeing color
,
stupid cam
,
view night camera vs eye
Click on a term to search for related topics.