Results 1 to 15 of 15
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By charlie76

Thread: Stupid focus question...but hey...I need some friggin advice...

  1. #1
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,015
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    164 times

    Stupid focus question...but hey...I need some friggin advice...

    Ok...I need advice on something please! Lately I have been shooting wood compositions (some of you probably have seen, I've been at if for a few weeks now)...I am struggling with focus in the entire frame...and I need a little advice from the gurus...and try not to make too many smart-A comments if this is a stupid question

    Try to stay with me while I explain:

    Consider a flat subject...looking straight down at beach sand, for instance. I want to shoot it from 2-3-4-5-6 feet away....with a zoom lens...50-100mm (that's the best "zoom" I have). Now here comes the stupid question. With large apertures...crisp, clear focus...but only in the center of the frame. The rest is blurry as hell. Small apertures...not crisp...but the same in most areas of the frame

    Using f-9 or f-10....gives ok focus on "most" of the frame...and good crispness in the center.

    Am I thinking about this the right way? How can I get the entire frame as sharp as the center when using large apertures??

  2. # ADS
    Ads
    Google Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

  3. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Old Town, ME
    Posts
    2,708
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    338 times
    I put a link up to a dof calculator in your other thread. I'm guessing you are too close, so being that close you'll have to stop down more and in return need more lighting. When you are really close...you only have a few inches of dof, resulting in areas of your subject out of focus.

  4. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Old Town, ME
    Posts
    2,708
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    338 times
    plugging in your info from a shot of yours I have, you can see your total dof is .56 ft or basically 6 inches. That's guessing at 5 feet away.

    Online Depth of Field Calculator

  5. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Old Town, ME
    Posts
    2,708
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    338 times
    also, were you shooting free hand? or on a tripod? does your zoom have VR?

  6. #5
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,015
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    164 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernicus
    plugging in your info from a shot of yours I have, you can see your total dof is .56 ft or basically 6 inches. That's guessing at 5 feet away.

    Online Depth of Field Calculator
    Ah..I see. That's what I thought. I haven't taken this many close shots..and never had to "focus" on this issue before...lol

  7. #6
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,015
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    164 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernicus
    also, were you shooting free hand? or on a tripod? does your zoom have VR?
    freehand...and yes, my lens has VR...which I leave on. Never used VR in any of my older film stuff...I think it is some sort of vibration reduces (VR)...does it mess with focus or anything? Should I leave it off?

  8. #7
    Chief Free Electron Relocator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    11,296
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    2684 times
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie76 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernicus
    also, were you shooting free hand? or on a tripod? does your zoom have VR?
    freehand...and yes, my lens has VR...which I leave on. Never used VR in any of my older film stuff...I think it is some sort of vibration reduces (VR)...does it mess with focus or anything? Should I leave it off?
    Nikon VR explained.
    Go forth and actuate!
    ....
    ...............................

    Your help is requested in (charitably) tossing me off the 345-foot Financial Center.

  9. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,015
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    164 times
    Quote Originally Posted by 480sparky
    Thanks Sparky.....Im on it.

  10. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Old Town, ME
    Posts
    2,708
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    338 times
    There are many reads on it, sparky put a good one. My personal experience with it , on a 70-300mm VR. I loved it. Freehand, I sucked so bad. Just was not used to the lens, with practice I would have gotten better. I was able to get an airplane in flight at 300mm, in focus. So I loved the VR on that one. It is noisy..but thats normal.

    on the 55-200mm vr....didn't reach out and touch me as much. It was ok...but I did ok without it.

    on my kit lens..I hardly use it.

    I never use it on a tripod...it can actually throw of your line of sight as it can cause a bit of barrel move...so program in your brain to turn it off when on a tripod.

    Just my personal observations on 3 lenses with it. Hope it helps.

    oh...one thing you might notice, especially at longer focal lenghts...if you move to get something quick you see off to the side or something, you may notice some lag in the image in your viewfinder "catching up" to your eyesight....that's normal.

  11. #10
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,015
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    164 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernicus
    There are many reads on it, sparky put a good one. My personal experience with it , on a 70-300mm VR. I loved it. Freehand, I sucked so bad. Just was not used to the lens, with practice I would have gotten better. I was able to get an airplane in flight at 300mm, in focus. So I loved the VR on that one. It is noisy..but thats normal.

    on the 55-200mm vr....didn't reach out and touch me as much. It was ok...but I did ok without it.

    on my kit lens..I hardly use it.

    I never use it on a tripod...it can actually throw of your line of sight as it can cause a bit of barrel move...so program in your brain to turn it off when on a tripod.

    Just my personal observations on 3 lenses with it. Hope it helps.

    oh...one thing you might notice, especially at longer focal lenghts...if you move to get something quick you see off to the side or something, you may notice some lag in the image in your viewfinder "catching up" to your eyesight....that's normal.
    That is good insight..thanks Ernie

  12. #11
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    12,698
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    4591 times
    Are you absolutely, positively, sure your your focal plane is absolutely parallel to the subject?
    With shallow DoF, not being parallel could make your edges softer and your center crisply focused, because the edges are falling out of the plane of focused DoF.

  13. #12
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,015
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    164 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Bitter Jeweler
    Are you absolutely, positively, sure your your focal plane is absolutely parallel to the subject?
    With shallow DoF, not being parallel could make your edges softer and your center crisply focused, because the edges are falling out of the plane of focused DoF.
    Good point...I think about that sometimes and vary my angle slightly when shooting. I'll consider that more often when I'm shooting these types of shots.

  14. #13
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    135
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    6 times
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie76 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bitter Jeweler
    Are you absolutely, positively, sure your your focal plane is absolutely parallel to the subject?
    With shallow DoF, not being parallel could make your edges softer and your center crisply focused, because the edges are falling out of the plane of focused DoF.
    Good point...I think about that sometimes and vary my angle slightly when shooting. I'll consider that more often when I'm shooting these types of shots.
    Yeah this was my thought too. If you're not totally in line with the focal plane that would cause apparently loss of clarity toward the edges. Aside from that, most lenses do have some loss of clarity towards the edges... varying depending upon the specific lens. There are some example shots here to give you an idea:
    Review of the Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM lens (page 2) - LENSTESTS

    Expand the "Test Shots" link under the "Sharpness/Resolution" section.

  15. #14
    KmH
    KmH is offline
    Helping photographers learn to fish
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    28,771
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2804 times
    You are also dealing with field curvature (focus plane curvature).

    In an ideal world a lens delivers a flat field, but because lens elements vary in thickness form the edge to the middle of the lens they deliver a curved field of view.

  16. #15
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,015
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    164 times
    Quote Originally Posted by KmH
    You are also dealing with field curvature (focus plane curvature).

    In an ideal world a lens delivers a flat field, but because lens elements vary in thickness form the edge to the middle of the lens they deliver a curved field of view.
    I'm glad I started this thread. Better understanding of the hardware = less guess work = better control of the image
    dylanstraub likes this.

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-08-2011, 11:48 AM
  2. Stupid focus question
    By kass617 in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-12-2010, 08:06 PM
  3. Am I friggin' stupid or what? Nikon shooter thinking Canon P&S.
    By kundalini in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 11-08-2008, 07:41 PM
  4. Stupid question
    By silver163 in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-23-2007, 02:08 AM
  5. Stupid focus!!
    By Brently in forum Just For Fun!
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-22-2004, 02:12 PM