Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
07-13-2012, 07:45 PM #1TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Posts
- 1,015
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 164 times
Stupid focus question...but hey...I need some friggin advice...
Ok...I need advice on something please! Lately I have been shooting wood compositions (some of you probably have seen, I've been at if for a few weeks now)...I am struggling with focus in the entire frame...and I need a little advice from the gurus...and try not to make too many smart-A comments if this is a stupid question

Try to stay with me while I explain:
Consider a flat subject...looking straight down at beach sand, for instance. I want to shoot it from 2-3-4-5-6 feet away....with a zoom lens...50-100mm (that's the best "zoom" I have). Now here comes the stupid question. With large apertures...crisp, clear focus...but only in the center of the frame. The rest is blurry as hell. Small apertures...not crisp...but the same in most areas of the frame
Using f-9 or f-10....gives ok focus on "most" of the frame...and good crispness in the center.
Am I thinking about this the right way? How can I get the entire frame as sharp as the center when using large apertures??
-
07-13-2012 07:45 PM # ADS
-
07-13-2012, 07:48 PM #2Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Old Town, ME
- Posts
- 2,708
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 338 times
I put a link up to a dof calculator in your other thread. I'm guessing you are too close, so being that close you'll have to stop down more and in return need more lighting. When you are really close...you only have a few inches of dof, resulting in areas of your subject out of focus.
-
07-13-2012, 07:51 PM #3Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Old Town, ME
- Posts
- 2,708
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 338 times
plugging in your info from a shot of yours I have, you can see your total dof is .56 ft or basically 6 inches. That's guessing at 5 feet away.
Online Depth of Field Calculator
-
07-13-2012, 07:53 PM #4Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Old Town, ME
- Posts
- 2,708
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 338 times
also, were you shooting free hand? or on a tripod? does your zoom have VR?
-
07-13-2012, 07:54 PM #5TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Posts
- 1,015
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 164 times
Ah..I see. That's what I thought. I haven't taken this many close shots..and never had to "focus" on this issue before...lol
Originally Posted by Ernicus
-
07-13-2012, 07:56 PM #6TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Posts
- 1,015
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 164 times
freehand...and yes, my lens has VR...which I leave on. Never used VR in any of my older film stuff...I think it is some sort of vibration reduces (VR)...does it mess with focus or anything? Should I leave it off?
Originally Posted by Ernicus
-
07-13-2012, 08:07 PM #7Chief Free Electron Relocator
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Iowa
- Posts
- 11,296
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 2684 times
Go forth and actuate!
....
...............................
Your help is requested in (charitably) tossing me off the 345-foot Financial Center.
-
07-13-2012, 08:12 PM #8TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Posts
- 1,015
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 164 times
Thanks Sparky.....Im on it.
Originally Posted by 480sparky
-
07-13-2012, 08:15 PM #9Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Old Town, ME
- Posts
- 2,708
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 338 times
There are many reads on it, sparky put a good one. My personal experience with it , on a 70-300mm VR. I loved it. Freehand, I sucked so bad. Just was not used to the lens, with practice I would have gotten better. I was able to get an airplane in flight at 300mm, in focus. So I loved the VR on that one. It is noisy..but thats normal.
on the 55-200mm vr....didn't reach out and touch me as much. It was ok...but I did ok without it.
on my kit lens..I hardly use it.
I never use it on a tripod...it can actually throw of your line of sight as it can cause a bit of barrel move...so program in your brain to turn it off when on a tripod.
Just my personal observations on 3 lenses with it. Hope it helps.
oh...one thing you might notice, especially at longer focal lenghts...if you move to get something quick you see off to the side or something, you may notice some lag in the image in your viewfinder "catching up" to your eyesight....that's normal.
-
07-13-2012, 08:23 PM #10TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Posts
- 1,015
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 164 times
That is good insight..thanks Ernie
Originally Posted by Ernicus
-
07-13-2012, 08:33 PM #11TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Cleveland, Ohio
- Posts
- 12,698
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 4591 times
Are you absolutely, positively, sure your your focal plane is absolutely parallel to the subject?
With shallow DoF, not being parallel could make your edges softer and your center crisply focused, because the edges are falling out of the plane of focused DoF.
-
07-13-2012, 08:46 PM #12TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Posts
- 1,015
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 164 times
Good point...I think about that sometimes and vary my angle slightly when shooting. I'll consider that more often when I'm shooting these types of shots.
Originally Posted by Bitter Jeweler
-
07-14-2012, 12:42 PM #13Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 135
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 6 times
Yeah this was my thought too. If you're not totally in line with the focal plane that would cause apparently loss of clarity toward the edges. Aside from that, most lenses do have some loss of clarity towards the edges... varying depending upon the specific lens. There are some example shots here to give you an idea:
Review of the Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM lens (page 2) - LENSTESTS
Expand the "Test Shots" link under the "Sharpness/Resolution" section.
-
07-14-2012, 01:00 PM #14Helping photographers learn to fish
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Iowa
- Posts
- 28,771
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 2804 times
You are also dealing with field curvature (focus plane curvature).
In an ideal world a lens delivers a flat field, but because lens elements vary in thickness form the edge to the middle of the lens they deliver a curved field of view.. . . . . . Keith . . . . . . .How Do I Use My Digital SLR?...
For Sale: Sold! Nikon SC-29 iTTL OCF flash cord w/AF Assist Illuminator
-
07-14-2012, 05:51 PM #15TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Posts
- 1,015
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 164 times
I'm glad I started this thread. Better understanding of the hardware = less guess work = better control of the image
Originally Posted by KmH
Similar Threads
-
continuous auto focus on d7000 question and advice
By 9ballprodigy in forum NikonReplies: 4Last Post: 12-08-2011, 11:48 AM -
Stupid focus question
By kass617 in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 06-12-2010, 08:06 PM -
Am I friggin' stupid or what? Nikon shooter thinking Canon P&S.
By kundalini in forum Photography Equipment & ProductsReplies: 33Last Post: 11-08-2008, 07:41 PM -
Stupid question
By silver163 in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 06-23-2007, 02:08 AM -
Stupid focus!!
By Brently in forum Just For Fun!Replies: 4Last Post: 10-22-2004, 02:12 PM




1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



