Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    157
    My Gallery
    (4)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    12 times

    Wide aperture vs. high ISO... Is my reasoning good here?

    So next year I'll be going to the Dominican Republic for humanitarian work and I'm trying to decide which lenses to bring. The goal is to bring the smallest and the fewest lenses so I don't look like an attractive target to a thief. I'm not going to bring a Speedlite.

    Last night I was thinking through this... let me know if this reasoning sounds logical or not.

    I already know I'm going to be in low-light situations in the buildings we'll be working in (no power most of the time). So for one of my lenses, you would think it would make more sense to bring a 50mm 1.4 instead of a 40mm 2.8, right?

    However...

    The 40mm at 2.8 is much sharper than the 50mm at around 1.6. So to get the same exposure with the 40mm, I have to up the ISO quite a bit. But I can remove noise fairly easily and get a quality pic, but I can't really sharpen up a photo that wasn't sharp in the first place.

    So it seems to make more sense to me to bring the 40mm (plus it's small enough to fit in my pocket - which would be a huge plus).

    Does that make sense? Any thoughts?



  2. #2
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Drumheller, AB, Canada
    Posts
    58
    My Gallery
    (3)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    4 times
    the 40 makes more sense to me, but why not a cheeper wide angle zoom. That way, if it's stolen, you're only out a small amount of coin? (just thinking of indoor shots of tight spaces at 40mm vs 24 or 18)

  3. #3
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    157
    My Gallery
    (4)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    12 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Underdeveloped View Post
    the 40 makes more sense to me, but why not a cheeper wide angle zoom. That way, if it's stolen, you're only out a small amount of coin? (just thinking of indoor shots of tight spaces at 40mm vs 24 or 18)
    I'm pretty much ruling out zooms because I feel like even 2.8 would be pushing it with the available light I'll have (I've done this trip before). A 3.5-5.6 zoom would be worthless (since I don't want to bring a Speedlite and I'm not going to use pop-up flash). I would feel nervous as heck bringing my 24-70 just because of how big and "professional" it looks.

    If I bring a cheap zoom, which would require me to use pop-up flash... I might as well just use a P&S. I used a P&S this summer for this same trip and just was not pleased at all with the results.

    40mm is pretty tight. But I think most of the shots that I want to look "pro" will be close-up work anyway. I think I'm going to bring an 85mm as well for street stuff. For the group shots indoors, someone's iPhone will suffice.

  4. #4
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    New Olreans
    Posts
    151
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    29 times
    You could by a holga bounce flash for $10 and not care if it gets stolen or give it away at the end of your trip.
    Wait What?

  5. #5
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    6,762
    My Gallery
    (28)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    1382 times
    I think it'd make more sense to take the speedlite. You are working in dark buildings. You aren't going to get good results even with an incredibly fast lens and maximum ISO.
    Canon FanGirl Extraordinaire

  6. #6
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    6,348
    My Gallery
    (11)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2137 times
    Would you use the 50mm wide open?

    If so, you're gonna have to go up two stops, and I bet you're not going to be starting off at ISO 100, so you're getting in to the Land Of Noise big time.

    If you'd never use the 50 any wider than f/2.0 or whatever, and you ARE willing to use the 40 wide open, go for the 40. If you're always going to be two stops slower, take the 50.
    My awesome photography blog: Photothunk. You will hate it. Seriously. It's wordy and pretentious, and there are no pictures.
    Gear: Gripped Sinar F1, Vivitar 285HV on a Manfrotto rail, and a bunch of lens caps epoxied into a ball.

  7. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,449
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    117 times
    For me, 40 or 50mm inside a building may be too long.
    By the way, noise is never just removed with no consequences: it brings away some sharpness too.
    Canon 60D + Tamron 17-50/2.8 VC + Sigma 50-150/2.8 + Canon 55-250IS; Sony NEX3 body; + "some" old manual lenses (M42, M39, Nikon, C/Y)
    My Flickr

  8. #8
    KmH
    KmH is offline
    Helping photographers learn to fish
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    32,534
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    3570 times
    +1 on - Take a hot shoe flash unit.
    . . . . . . Keith . . . . . . .How Do I Use My Digital SLR?...
    Photography is at its core an attempt to represent the reality of light in a media that canít faithfully reproduce it.

  9. #9
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic US
    Posts
    12,198
    My Gallery
    (63)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    4196 times
    Insure your stuff and take whatever gets the best image.
    Lew

    A review of two photo shows - Yousuf Karsh and Garry Winogrand

    11 Tips for Beginning photographers

    Pictures, etc at LewLortonPhoto.com
    Twitter feed @LewLorton
    Skype Lewis.Lorton

    Art is not a mirror, but a hammer: it does not reflect, it shapes.
    Leon Trotsky, Literature and Revolution(1924):

  10. #10
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Western MA
    Posts
    1,173
    My Gallery
    (4)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    202 times
    If I were going there, I'd probably pick up a used 40D or 50D, a used 440 EX, and a used 18-135 f3.5-5.6 and go with just that. I might also pack the 50 f1.4 as well, for low light situations where the flash can't be used. When I had an EF-S 18-135, I found it was a great all-around lens, but needed flash indoors.

    With a total investment target of about $700-800, if it gets lost or stolen, it would certainly 'hurt', but not as bad as losing a 24-70 + body + <whatever else>.

  11. #11
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cork Ireland
    Posts
    2,209
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    354 times
    Canon? EF35mm f/2. Cheap fast and wide
    ​IF YOU'RE NOT IN, YOU CAN'T LOSE

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/its-been-done-before/

  12. #12
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    (near Brussels)
    Posts
    507
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    58 times
    Quote Originally Posted by MLeeK View Post
    I think it'd make more sense to take the speedlite. You are working in dark buildings. You aren't going to get good results even with an incredibly fast lens and maximum ISO.

    I think the same, but without the speedlite.
    I'd take a stable mini-tripod with me, and use longer shuttertimes instead. So I don't need to worry about the large aperture or the high iso. That way you can carry a cheaper zoom too, like 18-55mm ?

    You'll always have to shoot from the floor or on top of something, that will be your only disability.

  13. #13
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    5,432
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1841 times
    All of this revolves around not taking a speedlight or not using a pop-up flash, and I don't get it. Take a speedlight or use the pop-up flash. I just don't see the problem. A speedlight will fit in a pocket. A couple of layers of tissue or a couple of pieces of white cardboard to make a reflector and the pop-up flash is quite functional.
    Scott Craig - Nashville, TN - Nikon D7100, D7000, D90, D60
    My web site: Tennessee in Photographs

  14. #14
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati OH
    Posts
    1,329
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    235 times
    Definitely take the speedlight. Will make you much more flexible. And if you don't know how to use bounce flash effectively what a perfect time to learn.
    "Well inspector, we opened up his computer and we found a plethora of tree porn. Some just posed, single tree shots and some were full on forest orgies. You can see he had a bit of a thing for dogwoods, too. Everyone knows dogwoods are the whores of the perennial world."

    -- Bentcountershaft

  15. #15
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    260
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    46 times
    I think we need more information to really answer your question. What body are you using and what ISO are you comfortable going to and what are your plans on displaying these images? If you are determined to have no noise in the images and want to stick to low ISO, then the flash advice may be relevant. I don't think you need to bring one though, but instead learn to work the light that is there. The buildings may be dark, but I bet they have some windows that let light in. Stay near them and shoot stuff that happens nearby heavily.

    As far as equipment goes, It seems like you already have the 50 and are thinking about getting the 40 for this trip. If that's true, I think you'd be better served with the added flexibility of something like the 28 1.8 or 35 f2 (they're a little more expensive though).

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Wide open aperture outdoors using sb-600?????
    By Reyna in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-23-2011, 08:59 PM
  2. Wide f/1.4 aperture outdoors question?
    By burstintoflame81 in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-15-2010, 10:47 AM
  3. Reasoning
    By pieq in forum General Gallery
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-27-2008, 06:19 PM
  4. wide angle lens and aperture
    By rubbertree in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-27-2008, 01:20 PM
  5. Wide aperture portrait
    By Zoolfoos in forum The Black & White Gallery
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-27-2008, 08:40 AM

Search tags for this page

high aperture high iso

,

high aperture vs speedlight

,

mw 306387 85 ????

,

what is wider aperture 28 or. 35

,

wide aperture vs high iso video

,

with high iso do yu need large apature

Click on a term to search for related topics.