Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: reverse macro help
-
05-18-2006, 03:15 PM #1No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- french lick IN
- Posts
- 88
- My Gallery
- (0)
- Liked
- 0 times
reverse macro help
ok i bought a 58mm reverse thing to put my 28-90 on my 75-300
but i put it togeather and i cant see crap. what ever i look at is just one big blur
ive tyred focasing in every way possible with both lens.
is it because my 28-90 has a convex front glass and the zoom has a flat front glass?
plz helpCanon EOS Rebel GII
Canon 28-90mm f/4.0-5.6
Canon 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6
Canon 50mm 1.8
and my 120 brownie cam
-
05-18-2006 03:15 PM # ADS
-
05-18-2006, 03:26 PM #2I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Edmonton
- Posts
- 32,084
- My Gallery
- (111)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1216 times
I've never tried reversing a zoom lens onto a zoom lens. I have always reversed a prime lens...but I don't see why it wouldn't work.
Firstly, the focus point will be very, very close to the lens. Maybe less than an inch. Secondly, the depth of field will be razor thin...anything that is not within that thin DOF....will be out of focus and be "one big blur".
You will probably need to have the camera mounted on a tripod or other support and then carefully find the distance where objects will appear sharp. Getting light on the subject may be tricky because the lens will be so close.
Then again, it might be possible that that combination of lenses just won't work.There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada. Actually, as the artist gets more into his thing, and as he gets more successful, his number of tools tends to go down. He knows what works for him. Expending mental energy on stuff wastes time.
Hugh Macleod
Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre.
-
05-18-2006, 03:53 PM #3No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- french lick IN
- Posts
- 88
- My Gallery
- (0)
- Liked
- 0 times
WoW you were right the focus point is like 1/4 away but the results are amazing
i can almost fill the veiw finder with the ball of a pen thats with the zoom at 100
and the small one at 35.
im having a bit of trouble focusing at 300 but ill get it figured out thxCanon EOS Rebel GII
Canon 28-90mm f/4.0-5.6
Canon 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6
Canon 50mm 1.8
and my 120 brownie cam
-
05-18-2006, 04:04 PM #4I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Edmonton
- Posts
- 32,084
- My Gallery
- (111)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1216 times
I don't know if your camera has DOF preview or not, but remember that you will have more DOF as you stop down the lens. Of course, you will have slow shutter speeds so be sure to use a tripod (or support) and fire the camera with a remote (or use the self timer) and don't touch the camera when it fires.
Here is a shot I took, can you guess what it is?
Last edited by Big Mike; 05-19-2006 at 07:48 AM.
There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada. Actually, as the artist gets more into his thing, and as he gets more successful, his number of tools tends to go down. He knows what works for him. Expending mental energy on stuff wastes time.
Hugh Macleod
Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre.
-
05-18-2006, 04:49 PM #5TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Tottenville, Staten Island, NYC USA
- Posts
- 2,014
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
Flipping a macro with a reverse ring can result in sharper images when working at ratios of greater than 1:1 -- that is, an image at the film/sensor plane larger than the actual object.
Marrying one lens to a second lens doesn't make much sense normally.Last edited by Torus34; 05-18-2006 at 04:52 PM.
"And gladly would he learn, and gladly teach." [Chaucer]
-
05-19-2006, 12:05 PM #6No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- french lick IN
- Posts
- 88
- My Gallery
- (0)
- Liked
- 0 times
i wish my camera had a dof preview but unfortantly it dosent
its very hard to keep something in focus and the shutter speed is already slow
from the lack of light im gona try some faster film (800) what i did was rolled up a blanket and layed my camera on it im gona get the film devolped here in a few hours so well see. thx for the help.
o yea and is it bread?Canon EOS Rebel GII
Canon 28-90mm f/4.0-5.6
Canon 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6
Canon 50mm 1.8
and my 120 brownie cam
-
05-19-2006, 01:01 PM #7I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Edmonton
- Posts
- 32,084
- My Gallery
- (111)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1216 times
Ya, you don't really need a tripod...but it's important to use a remote or the timer...in which case, you don't really need faster film because slow shutter speed won't be a factor. (besides the slight shake from the mirror slap, I doub't your camera has Mirror Lock Up)
Yes, that is bread. Last time I put that up, nobody guessed it.There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada. Actually, as the artist gets more into his thing, and as he gets more successful, his number of tools tends to go down. He knows what works for him. Expending mental energy on stuff wastes time.
Hugh Macleod
Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre.
-
05-19-2006, 01:37 PM #8No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- french lick IN
- Posts
- 88
- My Gallery
- (0)
- Liked
- 0 times
i was gona use the faster film so i could get a smaller apruture and wouldnt have as big of a prob with dof.
lol well what can i say i eat a lot of breadCanon EOS Rebel GII
Canon 28-90mm f/4.0-5.6
Canon 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6
Canon 50mm 1.8
and my 120 brownie cam
-
05-19-2006, 03:18 PM #9I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Edmonton
- Posts
- 32,084
- My Gallery
- (111)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1216 times
That's the right idea, but is unnecessary if the camera is completely still. You could stop down to F22...as long as you keep the shutter open long enough. In fact, for longer exposures, lower ISO film is probably better.
Originally Posted by lathamemmons
There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada. Actually, as the artist gets more into his thing, and as he gets more successful, his number of tools tends to go down. He knows what works for him. Expending mental energy on stuff wastes time.
Hugh Macleod
Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre.
Similar Threads
-
Reverse Macro
By Aussie Mike in forum Macro PhotographyReplies: 13Last Post: 04-07-2010, 06:23 PM -
more reverse macro
By Tangerini in forum General GalleryReplies: 6Last Post: 05-21-2007, 11:24 PM -
reverse macro?
By RedDevilUK in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 10Last Post: 04-18-2007, 02:17 PM -
Here's some more reverse macro
By BoblyBill in forum General GalleryReplies: 5Last Post: 01-09-2007, 07:55 AM -
Here's some reverse Macro
By BoblyBill in forum General GalleryReplies: 13Last Post: 01-08-2007, 10:36 AM
Search tags for this page
cant see anything reverse macro
,reverse macro help
Click on a term to search for related topics.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


