-
A few lenses for the 550D with $550 budget
Hello, I am about to get a Canon 550D and I am wondering what lenses to get. My Lens budget is~$550. Preferably a Macro lens and a standard lens. Currently I have decided on this:- Canon 550D from Digital Camera Warehouse-$719
- SanDisk 8GB Ultra II SD card-$34
Current lenses I am considering:
Sigma Macro Lens
Is there any tool that I could use to make it easier to choose a lens as I am really confused on a Lens to choose. I already have a Panasonic HDC-TM300 although I may take a few HD videos on this 550D occasionally. I decided to go to this forum for answers as I am probably choosing completely wrong lenses.
Often I will be taking photos of Wildlife at Dandenong National Park.
-
09-30-2011 09:46 PM
# ADS
-
That sigma is more than likely a nice lens but be careful of the "macro" written on it, its not a true macro but has a 2:1 ratio, which to be fair is quite good. For similar or slightly more money you could consider an Image Stabilized lens, the canon 55-250 IS being one choice. Are you getting the kit lens also? If you start at 55mm or 70mm you wont have any options for wider shots. The kit lens is probably 18-55mm and is good for a lot of photos.
If you want a dedicated macro lens that gives you 1:1 magnification it will be fixed focal length, will most likely be super sharp, have a wide aperture but (always a but) may have a slow autofocus which wont be great for other wildlife unless your good at manually focusing IMO
IF YOUR NOT IN, YOU CAN'T LOSE
-

Originally Posted by
jaomul
That sigma is more than likely a nice lens but be careful of the "macro" written on it, its not a true macro but has a 2:1 ratio, which to be fair is quite good. For similar or slightly more money you could consider an Image Stabilized lens, the canon 55-250 IS being one choice. Are you getting the kit lens also? If you start at 55mm or 70mm you wont have any options for wider shots. The kit lens is probably 18-55mm and is good for a lot of photos.
If you want a dedicated macro lens that gives you 1:1 magnification it will be fixed focal length, will most likely be super sharp, have a wide aperture but (always a but) may have a slow autofocus which wont be great for other wildlife unless your good at manually focusing IMO
After a little research, I have now found two other lenses. In general, is Sigma and Canon good brands for lenses? I've also changed to another shop.
Camera
50mm Lens
Macro Lens
-
Been spending a lot of time on here!

Originally Posted by
asuperpower
After a little research, I have now found two other lenses. In general, is Sigma and Canon good brands for lenses? I've also changed to another shop.
Camera
50mm Lens
Macro Lens
Canon and Sigma both make great lenses. At with everything in life, you get what you pay for. I have a Canon body (550D), Canon 50mm prime, Sigma 17-70 and a Sigma 50-200. With those 3 lenses, I can cover pretty much everything. The only real weakness is low light telephoto as the 50-200 is F/4-5.6, and the 17-70 is really soft at 70mm.
But still, for a grand total of $700 for all 3 lenses, it's a great set for the T2i.
-
You can't really make a decision about a lens just based on its manufacturer. Canon's got a lot of good ones, as does Sigma, but they also each make some less-than-desirable options as well. Tokina, Tamron, and Zeiss also make some great lenses. Check out photozone.de and lenstip.com for reviews of various lenses complete with measured performance data.
60d, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 24 1.4L II, Zeiss 35 1.4 Distagon, Zeiss 50 2.0 Makro-Planar, Canon 85 1.8, Yashica DX 135 2.8, flashy stuff, filtery stuff
-

Originally Posted by
analog.universe
You can't really make a decision about a lens just based on its manufacturer. Canon's got a lot of good ones, as does Sigma, but they also each make some less-than-desirable options as well. Tokina, Tamron, and Zeiss also make some great lenses. Check out photozone.de and lenstip.com for reviews of various lenses complete with measured performance data.
I was just asking whether there are any lens brands that I should avoid.
Canon and Sigma both make great lenses. At with everything in life, you get what you pay for. I have a Canon body (550D), Canon 50mm prime, Sigma 17-70 and a Sigma 50-200. With those 3 lenses, I can cover pretty much everything. The only real weakness is low light telephoto as the 50-200 is F/4-5.6, and the 17-70 is really soft at 70mm.
But still, for a grand total of $700 for all 3 lenses, it's a great set for the T2i.
I still want to get a dedicated macro lens.
-
No longer a newbie, moving up!
Rokinon makes inexpensive, good quality lenses. Only downside though, is that they have no autofocus motor.
-
The lenses and camera you mention are good choices. I assume so you are getting the kit and the 50 mm prime. I would go for a different macro then. The 60 is fine but macro lenses double up as fine portrait lenses also. You will have a 50 mm prime so I think you may be better to go for a longer macro such as a tamron 90 or Canon 100 or sigma 105 as examples. It just gives you more lens focal lengths and longer macro lenses enable you to stay that bit further away from insects giving less chance of frightening them off. Just an opinion.
IF YOUR NOT IN, YOU CAN'T LOSE
-

Originally Posted by
MichaelH
Rokinon makes inexpensive, good quality lenses. Only downside though, is that they have no autofocus motor.
That is not the only downside... they also tend toward very heavy distortion.
60d, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 24 1.4L II, Zeiss 35 1.4 Distagon, Zeiss 50 2.0 Makro-Planar, Canon 85 1.8, Yashica DX 135 2.8, flashy stuff, filtery stuff
-
As stated, the Sigma lens you linked does not have image stabilization... a huge factor if you try to hand-hold at higher focal lengths. I can't say enough good things about the 17-70 Sigma in my bag, and I'm sure for a few more dollars you'll find a good Sigma that will suit your needs.
Canon Rebel EOS T1i
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS, EFS 55-250mm, EF 70-300mm IS USM, EF 50mm
Follow me on Twitter. I never discuss anything important:
@sRDennyCrane
-
No longer a newbie, moving up!
1. EFs 18-55 IS II
2. EF 50 F1.8 or EF 50 F2.8 Macro.
The first will cover 85% of use and the second give you very sharp pictures. EF 50 F2.8 Macro may cost a little bit more.
Canon EOS 5D MarkII | EF 24-70 F2.8 L & EF 70-200 F2.8 IS II L | 580 EX II
-
No longer a newbie, moving up!

Originally Posted by
finephoto2008
1. EFs 18-55 IS II
2. EF 50 F1.8 or EF 50 F2.8 Macro.
The first will cover 85% of use and the second give you very sharp pictures. EF 50 F2.8 Macro may cost a little bit more.
18-135mm is a much better lens than the 18-55mm.
Canon 60d | Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 | Minolta 35mm f/2
......Love is not consolation. It is light.
.......................................-Friedrich Nietzsche
-
I can't say enough bad things about the EF-S 18-55 lens.
Canon Rebel EOS T1i
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS, EFS 55-250mm, EF 70-300mm IS USM, EF 50mm
Follow me on Twitter. I never discuss anything important:
@sRDennyCrane
-
No longer a newbie, moving up!
I'd suggest you get a 2nd hand EF-S 60mm USM Macro lens, it is a terrific prime, very sharp even wide open an if you can save up a little more and get a EF-S 18-135 IS for general use. Or you can get both 2nd hand if you can catch some bargains on ebay.
::Rebel XTi
Silver // Canon EF-S 18-135 IS // Canon EF 50mm II::
Here's my flickr
-

Originally Posted by
LuigiVN
I'd suggest you get a 2nd hand EF-S 60mm USM Macro lens, it is a terrific prime, very sharp even wide open an if you can save up a little more and get a EF-S 18-135 IS for general use. Or you can get both 2nd hand if you can catch some bargains on ebay.
Ok. I'll get the EF-S 60mm Macro Lens as stated before and I'll also save a little more up and get the EF-S 18-135mm IS. Thank you!!!!!