Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    U.P.
    Posts
    10
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times

    Difference between canon Ef-s IS and canon Ef-s IS II?

    Hey, does anyone know the difference between the Canon 18-55mm Ef-s IS, and the canon Ef-s 18-55mm IS II? I seem to be having some trouble, figuring this out.

    Any help?

    Thanks Michael



  2. #2
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cork Ireland
    Posts
    2,220
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    355 times
    I read somewhere that the II version has better optics. They are both light and plasticky but the mark II gets very good ratings on picture quality.
    ​IF YOU'RE NOT IN, YOU CAN'T LOSE

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/its-been-done-before/

  3. #3
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    33,206
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1571 times
    With a little digging, I found this...
    According to Canon, only very slight cosmetic changes were made for the "II" designation. "The major changes are the shape of the zoom ring rubber grip and the tapered area at the front of the lens." (Canon) These two lenses share the same manufacturer MTF charts.
    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...ns-Review.aspx

  4. #4
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cork Ireland
    Posts
    2,220
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    355 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Mike View Post
    With a little digging, I found this...
    According to Canon, only very slight cosmetic changes were made for the "II" designation. "The major changes are the shape of the zoom ring rubber grip and the tapered area at the front of the lens." (Canon) These two lenses share the same manufacturer MTF charts.
    Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II Lens Review
    Sorry for the wrong info I gave, I actually thought the mark II was the superior one to get
    ​IF YOU'RE NOT IN, YOU CAN'T LOSE

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/its-been-done-before/

  5. #5
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    33,206
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1571 times
    I just noticed that the page I pulled that from...isn't talking about the IS versions of that lens....so you may still be correct.

  6. #6
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    33,206
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1571 times
    Here are some snippets from the review for the 18-55mm IS II.
    As I said in the beginning of the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens review, the "II" replaces the "I". "The version II of this lens includes new IS algorithms to distinguish between normal photographing and when the camera is panning to automatically provide the optimal level of image-shake correction."

    From what I can tell, the only other "I" to "II" changes are cosmetic (version "I" is on the left):
    As I mentioned a couple of times in the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens review, the "II" replaces the "I". Optically, I'm not seeing many differences between the two lenses - my "I" is my very slight preference to my "II" optically. And Canon does not indicate that any optical design changes have been made.
    Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens Review

  7. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cork Ireland
    Posts
    2,220
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    355 times
    I searched for the article but it was a while back, I think in Photoplus, the canon magazine, but it may have(and more than likely was) been that the IS version was optically better than the non-IS version. I know a recent enough canon kit lens was a big improvement over its predecessor. I'm not 100% but your research seems more sound
    ​IF YOU'RE NOT IN, YOU CAN'T LOSE

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/its-been-done-before/

  8. #8
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    33,206
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1571 times
    I think you may be correct, the 'big' improvement in the evolution of the 18-55mm kit lens, was when they first introduced IS.

    I still maintain that this lens (all of them) get more of a bad reputation than they deserve. I mean, we're talking about a $100 lens....so you can't really expect it to compare well against $1000 lenses.

  9. #9
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cork Ireland
    Posts
    2,220
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    355 times
    To be honest I never had a problem (in ok light) with mine and think the photos are fine, but I may be easily enough pleased. I was very recently thinking of upgrading to a wider aperture one but I have bought a lot the last year or so and have to draw the line. Its ok to up the ISO every now and then when your not getting paid for photos. We would all of course love all our lenses to be fast and expensive, but a lot can be said for a light cheap lens also
    ​IF YOU'RE NOT IN, YOU CAN'T LOSE

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/its-been-done-before/

  10. #10
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    U.P.
    Posts
    10
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    Thanks for all of your reply's they helped me greatly. right now i have the Canon ef-s 18-55mm and was just looking at the IS one and saw the version II.

    Thanks again!
    Michael

  11. #11
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    196
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    11 times
    i wouldn't get another canon 18-55. I have the non-IS myself and I have also used the IS version. Neither of them are very impressive (it is a $100 lens after all)

    if you want something in the similar focal range check out the tamron one (17-50 f2.8). it's faster and delivers higher image quality. i use it as my main lens.
    I am very bitter these days.

    Canon EOS 60D, Tamron 17-50 f/2.8, Canon EF 75-300 III

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Canon 7D vs 60D - Is there really a huge difference
    By kdeerhake in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 08-26-2011, 08:43 AM
  2. Difference between the Canon 24 f/1.4L and 28 f/1.8?
    By JClishe in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-13-2011, 11:01 PM
  3. Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L....what's the difference?
    By robbie_vlad in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-31-2009, 08:45 AM
  4. Difference Between Canon 350D and 30D??
    By cbay in forum Digital Discussion & Q&A
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-19-2006, 03:22 AM
  5. Difference Between Canon 350D and 30D??
    By cbay in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-19-2006, 03:22 AM

Search tags for this page

canon defference between isii and isiii
,
canon is vs is ii
,
difference between canon 18-55mm is and 18-55mm is ii
,

difference between canon is and is ii

,
difference between canon is and is ii lenses
,
difference between is and is ii
,
difference between the cannon is and is ii
,

what is the difference between canon is and is ii

,
what is the different between canon is lense and is11 lense
,
what's the difference between is ii & is lenses
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread