Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    131
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    10 times

    Canon 70-200 L IS Versus 100-400L IS

    I'd love to have both of these and may someday. For now, with the understanding that the 70-200 is sharper than the 100-400, has anyone tried both and have impressions to share? I was originally going to get the shorter lens but am now tempted by the longer lens as an interim solution to having both.



  2. #2
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    33,206
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1571 times
    I can't remember where...but I read a review that showed the 100-400mm as being sharper than any of the 70-200mm options. But on the other hand, I've always heard that the 70-200mm F4 IS, was one of the sharpest zooms in the line-up.

    The big difference between these two (besides the obvious focal length) is size & weight. The 100-400mm is twice the size and probably three times the weight of the 70-200mm F4.
    So how you intend to use the lens, should probably play a factor in which one to get. The 100-400mm is great for wildlife, but it would be a huge pain to lug that thing around when all you want is a leisurely hike. Or if you're going on a serious hike, you may not want to pack that extra size & weight.

    *edit*
    I had it in my mind that you specifically mentioned the F4 IS version.
    As mentioned, there are 4 different versions of the 70-200mm (5 if you count both the new and old versions of the 2.8 L IS).
    Last edited by Big Mike; 02-29-2012 at 11:58 AM.

  3. #3
    Dao
    Dao is online now
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    5,857
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    331 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Mike View Post
    I can't remember where...but I read a review that showed the 100-400mm as being sharper than any of the 70-200mm options.
    Maybe from here

    JuzaPhoto - Canon, Sigma and Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 lenses (and 100-400)

  4. #4
    has a hat around here somewhere Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UK - England
    Posts
    19,787
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2495 times
    Which specific 70-200mm are you referring to? Canon has 5 on the market.

    Personally the only 70-200mm that I'd consider as suitable comparison is the 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII. That lens (the newest and also most expensive) has improved optics over the original and is an outstanding lens for its 70-200mm range. Furthermore it will take a 2*TC and deliver image quality on par with a good copy of the 100-400mm L (with both also showing marked improvement in optical quality after f7.1/8).
    The other 70-200mm f2.8 lenses will mount a 2*TC, but are not as good - I owned the previous version of the lens and the 2*TC was something I used only once = whereas the MII I'm willing and able to use it all the time without any worries.

    On the other hand the 70-200mm f2.8 MII is heaver than the 100-400mm and more expensive and also has slightly slower AF (when using the 2*TC). If its pure reach you want the 100-400mm would be a good option to consider - also you've the good quality 300mm f4 IS L (+1.4TC) and the 400mm f5.6 L. The 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII is suitable only if you also want a sharp, fast focusing and excellent 70-200mm lens in its own right.

  5. #5
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    131
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    10 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Dao View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Mike View Post
    I can't remember where...but I read a review that showed the 100-400mm as being sharper than any of the 70-200mm options.
    Maybe from here

    JuzaPhoto - Canon, Sigma and Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 lenses (and 100-400)
    Thanks. I see a comparison a 400mm with a teleconverter on the Canon 70-200. This is the one I saw LensRentals.com - Rent a Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS

    In any case, the 100-400 looks like a contender.

    I was talking about the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS lens.

  6. #6
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    131
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    10 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Overread View Post
    Which specific 70-200mm are you referring to? Canon has 5 on the market.

    Personally the only 70-200mm that I'd consider as suitable comparison is the 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII. That lens (the newest and also most expensive) has improved optics over the original and is an outstanding lens for its 70-200mm range. Furthermore it will take a 2*TC and deliver image quality on par with a good copy of the 100-400mm L (with both also showing marked improvement in optical quality after f7.1/8).
    The other 70-200mm f2.8 lenses will mount a 2*TC, but are not as good - I owned the previous version of the lens and the 2*TC was something I used only once = whereas the MII I'm willing and able to use it all the time without any worries.

    On the other hand the 70-200mm f2.8 MII is heaver than the 100-400mm and more expensive and also has slightly slower AF (when using the 2*TC). If its pure reach you want the 100-400mm would be a good option to consider - also you've the good quality 300mm f4 IS L (+1.4TC) and the 400mm f5.6 L. The 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII is suitable only if you also want a sharp, fast focusing and excellent 70-200mm lens in its own right.
    I meant the 2.8 with IS.

    Of course, I want all the best available sharpness, features, and reach though I imagine 80% or more of my use in the 100-200mm range.

    It may be worth noting that I'm using a 60D cropped sensor now and will hopefully go FF but not at least for a year, maybe longer.
    Last edited by Mike K; 02-29-2012 at 05:07 PM.

  7. #7
    has a hat around here somewhere Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UK - England
    Posts
    19,787
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2495 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike K View Post
    I meant the 2.5 with IS. Are you talking about the currently available $1300 lens or the soon to be released $2200 II lens?
    Hmm the currently available is the MII $2200 lens - the Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII. The original version of that lens is now out of production and only sold second hand (far as I know there is no new stock left of it - if there is chances are its selling at an outrageously high price now)

  8. #8
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    131
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    10 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Overread View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike K View Post
    I meant the 2.5 with IS. Are you talking about the currently available $1300 lens or the soon to be released $2200 II lens?
    Hmm the currently available is the MII $2200 lens - the Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII. The original version of that lens is now out of production and only sold second hand (far as I know there is no new stock left of it - if there is chances are its selling at an outrageously high price now)
    Sorry, I didn't edit in time. I got confused and was thinking of the 24-70 version I and II. Just bought a version I on Ebay. Wish me luck.

    I meant the 2.8 70-200 with IS.

    Of course, I want all the best available sharpness, features, and reach though I imagine 80% or more of my use in the 100-200mm range.

    It may be worth noting that I'm using a 60D cropped sensor now and will hopefully go FF but not at least for a year, maybe longer.
    Last edited by Mike K; 02-29-2012 at 06:26 PM.

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Canon 300mm f4L vs 100-400L f4.5-5.6
    By Hardrock in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-13-2010, 07:22 AM
  2. Canon EF 100-400L question
    By tvphotog in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-19-2007, 08:31 PM
  3. Canon 40D versus 30D pls advise
    By jabardast in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-20-2007, 07:09 AM
  4. WTS/WTT Canon 100-400L IS
    By Orgnoi1 in forum Buy and Sell
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-29-2006, 02:31 PM
  5. Canon versus Sigma
    By binglemybongle in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-18-2005, 01:46 PM

Search tags for this page

100-400 canon
,
70-200 f2.8mii
,
70-200 vs 100-400
,
canon 70 200 f4 vs 100 400 is
,

canon 70 200 is 100 400 is sharper

,
canon 70-200 vs 100-400 sharpness
,
canon 70-200 vs canon 100-400 comparison
,
difference between canon 70-200 vs 100-400
,
old 2003 canon 100-400 is lens vs 2013
,
tamron 200 -500 lens vs canon 100-400l
Click on a term to search for related topics.