Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Best Zoom Lens For the Money T3i

  1. #1
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    66
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times

    Best Zoom Lens For the Money T3i

    Hey Guys,

    Been spending all of my extra time reading up on these cameras and stuff. I need to pick up a zoom lens. My first question is. How do I tell how far a lens can zoom in? This has been very confusing to me LOL.

    I am going to NYC next month and will be shooting some athletic events moving forward.



  2. #2
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    I wasn't born in your seven days
    Posts
    9,737
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    2723 times
    The best zoom lens for your money would be the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM II. Because you get what you pay for.

    You can tell how far a lens zooms in by reading its focal range. The one I listed is 70-200mm, so it zooms into 200mm at its longest. However, it has a constant f/2.8 aperture which is extremely nice. It also has IS (image stabilization) and USM (ultrasonic motor) for fast focusing. If you're going to be shooting athletic events, this is the lens that you need.

    If this lens is outside your price range, it's because you didn't list a price range, therefore I gave you "the best zoom lens for your money."
    Click above to visit my new site
    Maine Wedding and Portrait Photographer

  3. #3
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    66
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Thanks for your reply Tyler. There are a few in my area on CList for $1,600, but I want to stay within the 400 or so range. =]

    I would be using it more for regular outside use than sporting events.

    What does the first number mean? So 200mm = 200 meters?

  4. #4
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    33,219
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1577 times
    What does the first number mean? So 200mm = 200 meters?
    No, it doesn't work like that at all.

    Focal length is a distance between elements off the lens/design.
    Focal length - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    It changes the magnification and the field of view. The view will be different, depending on the camera you have etc.

    The important part is to know that a longer focal length, give you a tighter FOV. You can shoot things that are 10 feet away or 1000 feet away.

    There are a few in my area on CList for $1,600, but I want to stay within the 400 or so range. =]
    Those are likely the version I of the lens he mentioned. The version II is pretty new and a lot more expensive ($2400), so unlikely to be found used for even $1600.

    In the $400 range, you can look at a Canon 75-300mm. They have several versions...going as low as about $200. These lenses don't have a large, consistent maximum aperture like the other one though. So instead of F2.8 though the range, you'd get F4 at 75mm and F5.6 at 300mm. But seeing as 300mm is longer than 200mm, you would get more 'reach'.

    A good one, for a little more money, is the Canon 70-300mm with IS. I think it's around $600-$700 new, but you might find it cheaper used. It's better quality than the cheaper options.

    Tamron has a 70-300mm with VC (their version of IS) which is supposed to be pretty good, and the price is (I think) around $300.

  5. #5
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    66
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Thanks mike. I understand the fov. I do not understand aperture. Is would be a must

  6. #6
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    33,219
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1577 times
    Sorry for another Wiki link...but here it is Aperture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    The aperture is the 'hole', through which the light travels. In a lens, it's an adjustable diaphragm, akin to the pupil in the human eye. It can open to let more light in, and it can close to let less light in. Each lens has a maximum aperture and for the most part, the larger the maximum aperture, the more desirable the lens is.

    The aperture is represented by the F number (F stop). It's a fraction/ratio...so the lower the F number, the larger the aperture is. For example, F2.8 is larger than F5.6.

    When you look at a lens, the maximum aperture is in the name. So the 70-200mm F2.8, has a maximum aperture of F2.8 (at any zoom position). Some lenses (usually the cheaper ones) have a variable maximum aperture. For example, 70-300mm F4-5.6. This means that the maximum at 70mm is F4, and the maximum at 300mm F5.6.

    So why do we want a larger aperture? Well, it lets in more light. That means that we can get a faster shutter speed (given the same exposure). A faster shutter speed will mean a sharper photo. It can also mean a lower ISO, which means less digital noise in your image.
    Also, a larger aperture will render a shallower Depth of field. So if you want those shots where the subject is in focus, but the background is out of focus, that is usually done with a larger aperture.

  7. #7
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    66
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Thanks Mike. I love the links as it increases my knowledge on the subject.

  8. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Western New York
    Posts
    1,823
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    177 times
    What about something like a 70-200 F/4? Not sure if it has IS, but even if it doesn't, it's a full stop faster than any 70-300 on the market so it has the same effect, and it's an extremely sharp lens. They can be had used for $700-800 I think, but I'm not a canon guy so don't quote me on that.

  9. #9
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,923
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    330 times
    70-200 f/4 was what I thought of as well, and there is an IS version. I'm not really sure how prices run on them however.
    60d, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 24 1.4L II, Zeiss 35 1.4 Distagon, Zeiss 50 2.0 Makro-Planar, Canon 85 1.8, Yashica DX 135 2.8, flashy stuff, filtery stuff

  10. #10
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    66
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens is about 400 bucks or so.
    Last edited by USCRugbyNo1; 03-13-2012 at 10:19 PM.

  11. #11
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Annapolis
    Posts
    208
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    24 times
    You can get a 70-200 f4 non is for about $500 used. IS version around $900.

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk

  12. #12
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    66
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Quote Originally Posted by iresq View Post
    You can get a 70-200 f4 non is for about $500 used. IS version around $900.

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
    Out of my budget!

  13. #13
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    66
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Do you guys think the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM would be overkill?

  14. #14
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    66
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    or a Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Lens? I'm thinking for the money, this lens would be better. Only $100 bucks

  15. #15
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    629
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    97 times
    Quote Originally Posted by USCRugbyNo1 View Post
    or a Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Lens? I'm thinking for the money, this lens would be better. Only $100 bucks
    No the EF-S is your standard kit lens, which is a low quality lens. When buying a lens it really is a case of "you get what you pay for".

    if its "reach" that your after I would say that the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM is the way to go. You would regret not getting better quality lenses.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Zoom no zoom. Lens go boom!
    By newcoyote in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-27-2012, 07:45 PM
  2. Gonna Save Money (Buying a Lens Adapter Instead of a New Lens)
    By AgentDrex in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-13-2010, 01:34 PM
  3. Is it worth the money....? Cosina 28-105mm 2.8 AF ZOOM LENS
    By DaEvilChelle in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-31-2009, 07:06 AM
  4. Best zoom for money Canon Rebel XT Digital
    By isobar in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-02-2007, 08:42 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-24-2006, 06:06 PM

Search tags for this page

best canon zoom lens for the money
,
best lense for canon t3i
,

best telephoto lens for canon t3i

,

best zoom lens for canon t3i

,
best zoom lens for money
,

best zoom lens for t3i

,
canon t3i telephoto lens
,
telephoto lens canon t3i
,
telephoto lens for canon t3i
,

zoom lens for canon t3i

Click on a term to search for related topics.