Results 16 to 19 of 19
-
01-15-2013, 01:54 PM #16TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Virginia
- Posts
- 3,552
- My Gallery
- (10)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1095 times
I have Rogonar-S lenses made by Rodenstock. This is a middle-of-the line enlarging lens. Not their best, not their cheapest, but a pretty darn good lens (I am informed). I picked them up on eBay for $25 or so each.
The makers you're looking for are Rodenstock, Schneider, and Nikkor-EL. Anything else might be excellent, might be crap, and there's probably no need to bother with figuring out which since you can pick up something by the big 3 easily enough (unless you want to be an enlarging lens nerd, and there's nothing wrong with that -- search the internets, read, learn -- I just don't know anything about it!)
The big three each have 2 or 3 "lines" they have built over the years, usually a budget line and a better line, and a very good line (Nikkor-EL might be an exception here?). Within each line, it probably doesn't matter much which brand you go for. Budget Schneider is a lot like Budget Rodenstock is a lot like Budget Nikkor-EL, I am pretty sure, and so on.
I found that on eBay the Rodenstocks seem to go for much cheaper than the others, for equivalent lenses. The Rogonar-S line especially struck me as good bang for the buck (basically they're darn near free, and they're good lenses -- the next step up to the Better line seemed to be selling for Real Money back when I was looking).Blogging about photography: Photos and Stuff.
Gear: Gripped Sinar F1, Vivitar 285HV on a Manfrotto rail, and a bunch of lens caps epoxied into a ball.
-
01-15-2013 01:54 PM # ADS
-
01-15-2013, 07:54 PM #17Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- Holland, Mi
- Posts
- 133
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 8 times
So far nobody has mentioned the reason for the different lenses. 50mm lens is used for 35mm film, 75mm lens for 2 1/4 square and 90mm for the 2 1/4 X 3 1/4. These lenses will cover the whole negative and give a reasonable height on the enlarger.
-
01-15-2013, 10:15 PM #18TPF Noob!
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- Mobile, AL
- Posts
- 17
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1 times
-
01-16-2013, 04:58 AM #19TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 4,081
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 147 times
It just means, with different negative sizes (format) one needs different focal length lens to be sure the negabvtive is vcovered from edge to edge.
With your new enlarger you will also need to change the negative stage. You will find a list of negatives size along the right hand side of the enlarger . You just move the upper stage of the enlarger so the arrow on the enlarger matches the size on the strut.
Similar Threads
-
Beseler Cadet II good starter enlarger?
By ToddLange in forum The DarkroomReplies: 7Last Post: 09-24-2009, 07:02 PM -
Get Listed
By DCPhotographer in forum Personal and Professional Photography WebsitesReplies: 0Last Post: 12-12-2008, 07:49 AM -
Good beginning enlarger, without spending a fortune...
By IanIanBoBian in forum The DarkroomReplies: 7Last Post: 12-18-2007, 12:49 PM -
Wondering if these are good lenses
By Corry in forum Photography Equipment & ProductsReplies: 6Last Post: 02-28-2007, 09:36 PM
Search tags for this page
beseler 67cs2
Click on a term to search for related topics.




1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

