Using tele lens w/ Kodak Z8612 IS

This is a discussion on Using tele lens w/ Kodak Z8612 IS within the Digital Discussion & Q&A forums, part of the Digital Photography category; I recently purchased a 3.5x telephoto lens to use with my Kodak Z8612 IS. My problem is I am having trouble getting my subject focused. ...


Go Back   The Photo Forum - Photography Discussion Forum > Digital Photography > Digital Discussion & Q&A

Digital Discussion & Q&A Questions or comments on all things digital! Discussion and advice on the latest techniques, plus all digital-related products.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2009, 10:07 AM   #1
TPF Noob!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grenada, MS
Posts: 3
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
Using tele lens w/ Kodak Z8612 IS

I recently purchased a 3.5x telephoto lens to use with my Kodak Z8612 IS. My problem is I am having trouble getting my subject focused. I use the lens mostly for sporting events. Any suggestions for manual settings? I'm not too familar with all the technical aspects since I usually just use the point & shoot auto settings. Thanks in advance.
Lynnrdh is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

ThePhotoForum.com is the premier Photography Forum & Digital Camera Resource! Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Old 09-11-2009, 10:38 AM   #2
I am Big, I am Mike
Site Moderator
 
Big Mike's Avatar
TPF Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 22,984
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 298 Times in 276 Posts
My Gallery: (93)
Welcome to the forum.

I don't really like the idea of adding something like a telephoto adapter to a camera like that. It usually hurts the image quality quite a bit...and you may have troubles with focus etc.

My suggestion would to be just do everything you can to get sharp photos without the adapter, then crop the image afterward.
__________________
"The most important thing I have learned over the years is the difference between taking one's work seriously and taking one's self seriously. The first is imperative, and the second disastrous"
Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
Big Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Big Mike For This Useful Post: Lynnrdh (09-11-2009)
Old 09-11-2009, 11:06 AM   #3
TPF Noob!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grenada, MS
Posts: 3
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
Yea, that's what I'm beginning to find out. But I only spent like $60 on the lens, so it's no big loss if I can't end up getting much use out of it. Was just hoping to get quality pics from outside the fence, ya know so I don't get KONKED on the head with a foul ball!
Lynnrdh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:16 AM   #4
I am Big, I am Mike
Site Moderator
 
Big Mike's Avatar
TPF Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 22,984
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 298 Times in 276 Posts
My Gallery: (93)
There are plenty of good reasons why pro sports shooters use cameras and lenses that cost as much as used cars. Shooting sports is pretty demanding on the equipment. Trying to do it with a point & shoot digi-cam may be fighting an uphill battle. But of course, your creativity and talent has a lot to do with it...it's not all in the equipment.
__________________
"The most important thing I have learned over the years is the difference between taking one's work seriously and taking one's self seriously. The first is imperative, and the second disastrous"
Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
Big Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 12:29 PM   #5
TPF Junkie!
 
benhasajeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Eddington, ME
Posts: 1,737
Thanked 35 Times in 34 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
Quote: Originally Posted by Lynnrdh View Post
Yea, that's what I'm beginning to find out. But I only spent like $60 on the lens, so it's no big loss if I can't end up getting much use out of it. Was just hoping to get quality pics from outside the fence, ya know so I don't get KONKED on the head with a foul ball!
Was the lens made for the Kodak specifically, or is it one of those third party this lens fits 250 different cameras type.

If it's specifically made for the Kodak there may be a setting you need to make in the camera's menu telling it the lens attachment is on.

If it's a fit anything type lens attachemnt that happens to fit your camera. You may have lost $60. Lens attachemnts can be good and usefull if they are designed for the lens they are to be used with. But unfortunately there are tons of cheap fit-all lenses out there that are nothing but cheap junk. They are not engineered to fit a specific lens other than filter or attachment size. They do no specific designs so an attachemnt works with a specific lens. So, you get bad optics. If you have not had it too long I would check on returning it.
__________________
If you want to know my equipment, your gonna have to specify which bag of equipment you want to know. Choices are bag #1 thru #6
benhasajeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 03:19 PM   #6
TPF Noob!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grenada, MS
Posts: 3
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
It is a Zeikos lens and as far as I know it's not specifically made for the Kodak. But even on Kodak's web site the compatible lens they suggest is from a 3rd party and not available for sale on their site. Sooo... just looking for any info & help I can get (especially since I'm new @ this). The place I ordered it from offered to swap for a 2.5X thinks it may be too much magnification??? I'm going to try it with a tripod this weekend to see what happens. Camera does have image stabilization but I'm thinking it may not work as well with this much zoom. Any ideas?
Lynnrdh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 08:01 PM   #7
TPF Noob!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 5
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
Welcome to the forum.
photograhpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 08:02 PM   #8
TPF Noob!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 5
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
I don't really like the idea of adding something like a telephoto adapter to a camera like that.
photograhpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   The Photo Forum - Photography Discussion Forum > Digital Photography > Digital Discussion & Q&A


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Visitors found this page by searching for:

kodak z8612 is lens

KODAK Z8612

kodak z8612 is

lens kodak z8612

lens z8612 is

kodak 8612 lens

3.5x telephoto too much

kodak z8612 is tele lens

z8612 adapter lens

kodak z8612 lens

z8612 lens

Z8612 is lens

kodak z8612 lenses

kodak z8612 IS Telephoto lens



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Celebrity Gossip - United States Message Board - Parrot Forum - Honda Motorcycle - iPhone News - iPhone 4 Forum - Motorola Droid Forum - Nintendo Wii Forum - Apple iPad Forum