Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Not too happy with my D7000 Quality... HELP!

  1. #1
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times

    Not too happy with my D7000 Quality... HELP!

    I have had my 7k for about a year now and through that time of working with it I know I am nowhere near mastering it and the problem is probably just me. However, my images just do not come out clean and crisp. I have read many threads over this subject and I am thinking the main problem is because I use studio lighting instead of flash. Could this impact my quality as much as it does? Also, I am not using a tripod for my work... I usually shoot handheld for flexibility. Are these key factors in my quality? Here is a screenshot of a comparison I made with a C-5D Mark II and my 7k. Now I know that the nikon is not on the level of the M-II BUT please let me know how I can improve...

    Image L:
    Focal length- 90
    F/8
    Exposure time: 1/60
    Flash

    Image R:
    Focal length: 105
    F/5.6
    Exposure time: 1/15
    Studio

    Please HELP. I just want tips to make my quality as close to that of the Mark 5D - improvements in general.
    Thank you.
    Attached Images Attached Images



  2. #2
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    5,457
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1861 times
    The image on the right was shot at 105mm and 1/15 second? That shutter speed is too slow for 105mm even with VR, especially since you are not using a flash.
    Scott Craig - Nashville, TN - Nikon D7100, D7000, D90, D60
    My web site: Tennessee in Photographs

  3. #3
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    17,146
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    4382 times
    When you say "Studio lighting", do you mean constant lighting.. like incandescent or flourescent?

    My advice.. throw that crap away... and get some real studio lighting.. as in Flashes....

    What set of Studio Lighting do you have?

  4. #4
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    203
    Posts
    2,319
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    352 times
    User error. Make sure you lock focus and using a decent shutter speed. If you are using slower, you risk camera shake. Especially, without flash.

  5. #5
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Michigan (Detroit Metro)
    Posts
    286
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    41 times
    Given the differences in shutter speed & aperture, I'm guessing the overwhelming majority of light in the first image is strobe. Despite the 1/60th shutter speed, you're getting a LOT less than 1/60th of a second of light, meaning the first shot will freeze motion a whole lot better than the 2nd.

    It'd be a lot more helpful to see a side-by-side comparison with equal shutter speed, aperture, and ISO (and preferably focal length, if you have the lenses for it.)
    WhiskeyTango
    Nikon D800 | Nikon D7000 | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8G | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 G | Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 II

    • "All good things come to those who wait." -Abraham Lincoln
    • "I hate waiting." -Inigo Montoya

  6. #6
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Thank you. And thank you for your kindness and not ripping me to shreds.... I have a kit I bought online from Kaezi.com and it seems to be of fair quality but I really am itching to buy a few Nikon hot-shoes... Is there another (cheaper$) brand you suggest... I have no problem spending the money for a Nikon set but if there is a way I could save some and get the quality that's always a plus!

  7. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    17,146
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    4382 times

    Studio (Constant) lights vs Flash / Strobes

    1) you can get a lot more power output from a strobe than a constant light source. (you would need like 50 to 100 bulbs to equal even one small flash.. and then you have to deal with heat)

    2) Constant lights sources produce a lot more heat. (even Flourescents make more than strobes do)

    3) Constant light sources are really bright and hard on the eyes of a model. Imagine having to stare into a 1500w light source. You will not be a happy camper.

    You can get good quality, inexpensive studio strobes... like the Flashpoints from Adorama... and get decent shots for a change

  8. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    17,146
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    4382 times
    If you would prefer speedlites.. get the Yongnuo 560's... cheap, not real powerful, but they do the job. Or the Vivitar 285's! Look at older Nikons like the SB-28...

    you can use these with wireless triggers on any camera...

  9. #9
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chesterfield UK
    Posts
    12,406
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    1815 times
    I love it when people blame the camera, it's all down to user error
    cgipson1 and Joel_W like this.

  10. #10
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Not at all blaming the camera. As stated in my original question "It is probably my fault" ... I am well aware and am not a "Know it all"... Thanks for your input.

  11. #11
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    203
    Posts
    2,319
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    352 times
    Quote Originally Posted by cgipson1
    If you would prefer speedlites.. get the Yongnuo 560's... cheap, not real powerful, but they do the job. Or the Vivitar 285's! Look at older Nikons like the SB-28...

    you can use these with wireless triggers on any camera...
    Good options.
    If you want to use cls or high speed sync you will need the newer sb's or even a compatible 3r party flash.

  12. #12
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chesterfield UK
    Posts
    12,406
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    1815 times
    Quote Originally Posted by DGFinePhoto View Post
    Not at all blaming the camera. As stated in my original question "It is probably my fault" ... I am well aware and am not a "Know it all"... Thanks for your input.
    Your biggest problem is shutter speed using 100mm you need at least 1/100

  13. #13
    KmH
    KmH is offline
    Helping photographers learn to fish
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    32,581
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    3584 times
    As mentioned, the main problem is not the hardware.

    It seems you have little, if any, understanding about how the camera or lighting works. That is essential knowledge you simply must have for using the camera effectively. The white balance in the image on the right is also off.

    Here is the deal with constant lights - a 500 watt constant light seems really bright to a human, and it's bright to a camera too, only if you can set and use a long enough shutter speed. That 500 watt light delivers that 500 watts in one second. If you used a 500W light, at 1/15 your photo only uses 1/15th of the 500 watts to make the exposure, or only 33.33 watts of light (a night light). (It's amazing how often math and mathematical relationships have to be used when doing photography.)

    In photography, 1 second is a long exposure time. 1/15 of a second is a long time too. Your D7000 has a 1/8000 of a second shutter.

    Few people can hand-hold a camera steady at 1/15 for a shutter speed, excpet when ultra wide angle lenses are being used. The basic rule-of-thumb is that the shutter speed needs to be 1/the focal length of your lens. In your example on the right above that would be 1/105 of a second for the slowest usable shutter speed that would not record camera shake blur induced by the photographer.

    For doing portraits, since the subject can't stay that still either, 1/100 is a kind of defacto minimum usable shutter speed even if you're using a lens with less than 100 mm for a focal length.
    . . . . . . Keith . . . . . . .How Do I Use My Digital SLR?...
    Photography is at its core an attempt to represent the reality of light in a media that canít faithfully reproduce it.

  14. #14
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    Thank you all for your valuable information. I will put them to use. Also, I will be switching to Speedlights and putting my constant lights on the backburner. I am really leaning toward ordering (2) Nikon SB-28 for now and then eventualy upgrading. My reason for this is that I have been saving $$ to purchase new glass.
    I have my original VR "Kit lens" (18mm-105mm) that came with my D7k & an older-class Nikkor Telephoto Zoom (75mm-240mm). I want to shoot mainly fashion as that is my passion, do you all have any lenses you would recommend for that type of work?

    I do admit that I have a bit to learn. However, I am eager and willing to take the plunge. I live in an area where there is not many resources or an option for a mentorship so the Internet and books at Barnes & Noble have been my guides. I confess that I have not had much time to really devote to my camera and that is the reason for my lack of knowledge.

    Thanks again for all of your support.

  15. #15
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    17,146
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    4382 times
    Any decent lens that will shoot portraits... good primes like 50mm 1.4 or 85mm 1.4 / 1.8 to zooms like the 24-70 2.8s and 70-200 2.8s.

    Depends on what you want, how much room you have to shoot, budget, and what you are shooting (both subject, and camera body).

    An 85mm will be LONG on a DX body... so probably not good indoors, unless you have LOTs of room. Sigma 50mm 1.4 is highly recommended.

    If you want seriously good zooms.. the two I mentioned rock...

    for Fashion.. lighting is as important, or even more important.. than the lens / body.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Losing quality when converting to JPG (a lot of quality)
    By Moe in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-20-2011, 09:34 AM
  2. Good quality lens for Nikon d7000?
    By ekohekoh1 in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-05-2011, 06:20 AM
  3. have a look at my monitor cover of Nex5/3 and Nikon D7000, Nex5/3,D7000
    By ggfoto in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-21-2011, 10:28 PM
  4. Canon and Nikon Quality and Quality Control
    By Playdo in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 09:56 AM
  5. HAPPY, HAPPY, HAPPY BIRTHDAY, JonK!!!
    By LaFoto in forum Off Topic Chat
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-03-2005, 11:01 PM

Search tags for this page

are you happy with d7000
,

d7000 for studio work

,

d7000 picture control for studio light

,
d7000 pictures arent coming out crisp
,

happy with d7000

,
how do i get my d7000 nikon to work with my studio lights
,
how do i select my type lighting in nikon d7000
,

nikon d7000 studio lighting

,
not happy with my d7000
,
not happy with the d7000
Click on a term to search for related topics.