Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Interpolation
-
08-10-2006, 12:45 AM #1I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Nottingham, UK
- Posts
- 464
- My Gallery
- (0)
- Liked
- 0 times
Interpolation
Hello you good people,
I've been approached about doing some shots for a company that they want blown up to A3. I have a D50, and so am slightly dubious as to whether the pixel count will get me that far (it's 6).
When I've looked into submitting to Alamy, they've asked that images are interpolated to a certain size in photoshop, so that they can be used for bigger spreads. I kind of get what interpolation is (sampling pixels around another to generate new pixels thus increasing size, right?), but I always thought it wouldn't give you that much more image quality, am I wrong?
Can I interpolate the pictures to get more acceptable print sizes and are there any perils associated with this.
Thanks in advance!
Jon
-
08-10-2006 12:45 AM # ADS
-
08-10-2006, 03:48 AM #2Damn You! Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- locked in the attic
- Posts
- 8,485
- My Gallery
- (13)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 5 times
I use interpolation when i do the artwork for a bus side advert or a billboard..... the bicubic smoother is my prefered choice..... it will make a lower rez image look better when blown up, by as you rightly said, increasing the pixel count.....
however i have not used it to increase the size of a photograph for optimal printing..... it would do the same thing if you wanted the pic to be massive.... but im not sure if it will make the photo look 'better'....... one thing it will probably do, is make your photo softer...... so you may want to consider this before you use interpolation.
-
08-10-2006, 08:00 AM #3I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Edmonton
- Posts
- 32,045
- My Gallery
- (111)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1202 times
A3 isn't really that big...you shouldn't have too much of a problem. Remember that something that is that size, isn't meant to be viewed up close. If you hang it on a wall and stand back, it will probably look pretty good.
Also, it helps if you maximize the sharpness from the start. Use a low ISO, a good lens, a tripod, M.L.U. etc.There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada. Actually, as the artist gets more into his thing, and as he gets more successful, his number of tools tends to go down. He knows what works for him. Expending mental energy on stuff wastes time.
Hugh Macleod
Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre.
Similar Threads
-
interpolation
By kcon in forum Graphics Programs and Photo GalleryReplies: 7Last Post: 05-28-2008, 01:30 PM -
Interpolation question
By eddiesimages in forum Beyond the BasicsReplies: 4Last Post: 04-20-2007, 04:27 PM
Search tags for this page
interpolation in digital photography
Click on a term to search for related topics.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


