+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portland!
    Posts
    6,845
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    245 times

    Opinions on Ektar 100

    I've been shooting film again recently, and over the years, my favorite color negative film has been Kodak Gold 200 because I like the warm saturation.

    I've heard nothing but good things about the Ektar, mostly how it scans, but as far as color goes, how would it compare to something like Fuji Reala, which is super accurate, or the Gold 200? I've heard that blues tend to be way too saturated?

    It's not too terribly expensive, i'm curious to run a test of the Ektar 100, Gold 100, and Portra 160VC side-bit-side and see what I like best.
    My Blog
    Quote Originally Posted by no dogs dragon man! View Post
    Well if it is lyk raining the cannons are really good for that but nikon is like all black so maybe good for sniperz?

  2. # ADS

  3. #2
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    55
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    I shot a roll of Ektar 100 a few weeks ago, I have not scanned it yet but i do have a contact sheet from the lab. The blues did indeed look very saturated. I would say, it is about as close to slide film as you will get with a print film. If you want slide saturation and low grain with the latitude and of print film, than i would say ektar 100 is your film. Otherwise, stay away.

  4. #3
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    sthlm - se
    Posts
    165
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    i haven't shot any ektar 100 yet but all i've seen so far didn't look too impressive to me.
    saturation and contrast just didn't seem much lively.
    kodak gold is not much of a good film. the reala you mentioned is a good and cheap one indeed, love the colours, contrasts and latitude of exposure. it's a nice, cheap, all rounder fast film.
    that said, the best advice is always to get a roll each and have a look yourself
    if i'm not shoegazing, i may be taking photos

  5. #4
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    454
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    1 times
    Too saturated for me generally. For some applications I'm sure that is okay/good.

    Dave
    Nikon F3
    Pentax LX
    Mamiya C330
    *Film*

  6. #5
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    456
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    Ektar is ok, not my favorite. Reala on the other hand is beautiful.

  7. #6
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Here N There
    Posts
    2,598
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    108 times
    I started shooting with Ektar not too long ago and it was love at first try! I used to shoot with consumer grade film like Kodak Gold 200 and Fujifilm. I was really unhappy with the grain and tried Ektar. It depends on your scanner, but when the lighting condition is right, it's as good as digital.

    However I am running into two issues which can be my own problem. First is that when I shoot a picture with large portion of blue sky, the sky turns gray. This has happened several times. Say if the composition consists of a building and mostly sky, the color on the building will be fine and the sky will be gray. It could be my scanner... I have no idea.

    Another issue is it doesn't seem to work well with my telephoto. I have a ED AF 70~300mm Nikkor lens. I can't seem to get sharply focused photo as well as films with higher ISO. I am sure that my shutter speed is fine. Again, I still haven't figured it out yet.

    Try it, it's very rewarding.

    Recent shots:





 

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Gray sky with Ektar
    By molested_cow in forum Film Discussion and Q & A
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-12-2011, 11:47 AM
  2. Ektar 100 now in 4x5 & 8x10
    By compur in forum Medium Format & Large Format
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-23-2010, 01:43 AM
  3. Issue with Ektar
    By molested_cow in forum Film Discussion and Q & A
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-08-2009, 12:21 PM
  4. Ektar 100
    By dinodan in forum Film Discussion and Q & A
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-25-2008, 10:20 AM
  5. ektar 100
    By rom4n301 in forum Film Discussion and Q & A
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-27-2008, 05:47 PM

Search tags for this page

ektar 100 vs portra
,

ektar 100 vs reala

,
ektar or reala
,

ektar vs portra

,

ektar vs reala

,
fuji reala vs ektar
,

fuji reala vs kodak ektar

,
how should i shoot ektar100
,
kodak ektar 100 vs fuji reala
,
kodak ektar vs fuji reala
,
kodak gold 200 vs ektar
,

portra vs ektar

,
reala ektar 100
,

reala vs ektar

,
shooting ektar 100
Click on a term to search for related topics.