+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Are lomography camereas good?

  1. #1
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    6
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times

    Are lomography camereas good?

    Are lomography cameras good? Feedbackkk!

  2. # ADS

  3. #2
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    680
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    148 times
    They are not supposed to be good, They are bad, that's why they are good

  4. #3
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    410
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    34 times
    They are very bad in a very expensive not good sort of way.

  5. #4
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    104
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    6 times
    See my thread a few down from this one about the kit camera. That is the kind of quality you can expect.
    Canon T3 with 18-55 f3.5, 55-250 f4.0, 50mm f1.8
    1962 Petri 2.8 35mm
    Early 1950's Yashica LM Medium Format

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/kamelean/
    http://500px.com/jbhughes

  6. #5
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    46
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    Depends, personally I made my first exposition with a Holga, but I wanted the "non-perfect" photographs intentionally. Now I am working with a LOMO-LC A, not the one from the Lomography ( a originall Russian one) . But one thing is for sure , you will not obtain those beautiful colored x-processed photographs you must do it in the lab ( wich at least for me it's expensive) or make an hybrid ( scan the film and then process it digitally ), and another very important thing you must know and have practiced a lot with film in order to "understand" this cameras. It's a good challenge though !

  7. #6
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Greenville, Texas
    Posts
    11,785
    My Gallery
    (4)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    578 times
    Most of their cameras are way overpriced. And they're sort of "crappy on purpose".

    I plan on buying that kit camera since it's only $10 and it looks really fun. Most of their other stuff looks like it would be fun too, but I'm not paying $200 (or more - they seem to range from $100 to $400, which is completely insane) for a toy camera...
    -Josh
    Flickr

  8. #7
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    6
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    K thankss for thr feedback

  9. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    2,255
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    362 times
    The advantage of lomos is that all you need to do is pt film in them, press the shutter and develop, and all your images will be suitable works of art. They're really pretty amazing.
    everything is new and nothing has ever been done before - richard rorty

  10. #9
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    410
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    34 times
    Quote Originally Posted by unpopular View Post
    The advantage of lomos is that all you need to do is pt film in them, press the shutter and develop, and all your images will be suitable works of art. They're really pretty amazing.
    I'm assuming that the irony is intended?

  11. #10
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    4,441
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    581 times
    Hipster's love 'em.
    D700 | Nikon 24-70 | Nikon 70-200 VRII | 50mm f/1.4 | Manfrotto | pocketwizards | flashes

  12. #11
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    104
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    6 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Proteus617

    I'm assuming that the irony is intended?
    Lol
    Canon T3 with 18-55 f3.5, 55-250 f4.0, 50mm f1.8
    1962 Petri 2.8 35mm
    Early 1950's Yashica LM Medium Format

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/kamelean/
    http://500px.com/jbhughes

  13. #12
    Mot
    Mot is offline
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Cumbria, England
    Posts
    173
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    27 times
    I've got the original releases of the Smena 8M and the Lubitel 166b. As has been said, what is called a 'good' picture depends on what you want to get out of it.

    I took these photos with the Smena using some cheap Kodak colour film, the kind you'd probably find in most lomo cameras. It's been scanned using a Hasselblad X1 and lightly edited in Lightroom, it's not changed too much from the original scan. As you'd expect from such a camera most shooting is guesswork, guess the focus, guess the framing and do the best you can with the Sunny 16 rule.




    I like this look when you want a bit of fun so I do think it looks 'good'. If I was serious then I'd stick to Provia, not 24 exposures for £1!

    If you're really into Lomography for that look then I've got some that didn't turn out quite as good.



    Look at all the light leak and I've even included the sprocket holes! How Lomo!

    As for the Lubitel, I did put a roll of Provia through that with unexpectedly good results. I haven't had the opportunity to scan them but they looked fine on the lightbox, the focus may have been off on a few but overall they looked great. No light leak but one accidental double exposure!

    I'd recommend them for the fun value, my tutors loved them, but forget about using them seriously.
    Last edited by Mot; 12-28-2011 at 06:33 AM.
    KB44 likes this.

  14. #13
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    2
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    Hi all,

    I'm just a lurker, too new and too timid to jump into anything yet, but wanted to throw in my $.02...

    My girlfriend has a cute littel Diana clone in some cool color that she loves. Have a few rolls of 120 film yet to be developed, but she got the instant back for it and we have a blast with it. With the film I've found, each image comes out to just under a buck when it's exposed hahahha, but they are worth it big time. It's a total hipster camera, it's kind of silly to think that money was spent on this thin plastic, image blurring tool, but it is also quite a blast at the same time. We have a lot of fun with it with our friends, and some of my favorite pictures of us are just when the camera was grabbed at random when we are goofing off laying around the apartment and snap some silly shot of us.


    Anyway, really fun little cameras. Worth the price tag to us for what we use it for, but it's up to you whether it's worth it or not. Google images shot by those cameras and decide if that's what your eye likes or not.

  15. #14
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    6
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1 times
    A friend of mine recently got one, and she loves it. Then again, she bought it for the intent of taking it with her everywhere she goes and shooting almost everything in sight. She has the LA Sardina. I think the best way to sum it up is a camera to specifically have fun with. I think the photos come out pretty cool though! Then again, I'm a newb. I think everything looks cool

  16. #15
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    2,255
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    362 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Mot View Post
    I took these photos with the Smena using some cheap Kodak colour film, the kind you'd probably find in most lomo cameras. It's been scanned using a Hasselblad X1
    LOL. That's awesome. You scanned images from a $13 camera on a $13,000 scanner!
    jowensphoto likes this.
    everything is new and nothing has ever been done before - richard rorty


 

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Have anyone heard of Lomography?
    By skywalker in forum Photographic Discussions
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-27-2010, 03:57 AM
  2. TLR Lomography
    By Iron Flatline in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-05-2008, 09:47 PM
  3. Lomography
    By tr0gd0o0r in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 10:46 AM
  4. Lomography - isn't it going too far??
    By Rolleistef in forum Photographic Discussions
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-16-2006, 08:25 AM
  5. lomography
    By noisytoy in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-04-2003, 08:37 AM

Search tags for this page

are lomography cameras good
,
lomography camera forum
,

lomography forums

,

lomography good?

,
lomography is good?
,
lomography widepan
,
smena 8m getting good pictures
Click on a term to search for related topics.