Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: minipods
-
10-25-2006, 04:47 AM #1TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Jerusalem, Israel
- Posts
- 1,337
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
minipods
I own a Nikon N80, and I'm looking for the smallest tripod that can support it (plus the 70-300 lens). I could not find any minipod that supports the weight.
Does anyone know of such a minipod?
-
10-25-2006 04:47 AM # ADS
-
10-25-2006, 10:57 AM #2Just Corinna in real life Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Lower Saxony, Germany
- Posts
- 34,626
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 491 times
Sorry, no, I don't, particularly not with the long zoom lens. Mine would not support my 350D and the Sigma 70-300mm, either. It only works with the small compact Powershot. The 350D will only just fall onto its "nose"...
-
10-25-2006, 11:22 AM #3I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Edmonton
- Posts
- 32,224
- My Gallery
- (111)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1264 times
I have a couple mini-pods...but I don't think I've ever tried them with my 70-300 lens. They might work...as long as one leg is directly under the lens.
Another thing you might try is a bean bag. Just put the camera onto the surface (ground, car, table etc) and then use the bean bag to prop up the lens.There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada. Actually, as the artist gets more into his thing, and as he gets more successful, his number of tools tends to go down. He knows what works for him. Expending mental energy on stuff wastes time.
Hugh Macleod
Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre.
-
10-26-2006, 02:01 AM #4TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Jerusalem, Israel
- Posts
- 1,337
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
Thanks,
The bean bag is a nice idea.
-
10-26-2006, 04:35 AM #5TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Tottenville, Staten Island, NYC USA
- Posts
- 2,014
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
As Big Mike said, beanbags [old socks stuffed with dried Navy beans] will certainly get the dog walked. If you're after precise positioning, here are a couple of additional possibilities.
If cost is not an object, you can hit the scientific supply sites and pick up a ring stand and a clamp or two. Not an elegant solution to be sure, but it should work. You can place a weight on the ring stand base to counter any 'Kamakazi nosedive' tendencies. It should also be possible to strip the head from a 'pocket' tripod and epoxy it to the clamp.
As an alternative, some older tripods such as the Star D series had center posts which are reversible. This puts the head between the legs of the tripod and as low to the ground as you wish.Last edited by Torus34; 10-26-2006 at 04:46 AM.
"And gladly would he learn, and gladly teach." [Chaucer]
-
10-26-2006, 05:01 AM #6TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Jerusalem, Israel
- Posts
- 1,337
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
I was actually looking for a minipod not because of the hight but because I like to travel as light as possible. I was just looking for something that fold really small.
-
10-26-2006, 07:26 AM #7Another option is the monopod. It really can help stabilize your camera. It isn't a tripod but it is better than hand held. It folds up pretty small. It also makes a good walking stick if you decide not to fold it up.
Originally Posted by danir
Fred




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


