Results 1 to 13 of 13
Thread: Duck Series. :)
-
05-28-2012, 09:03 PM #1I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- WA
- Posts
- 336
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 12 times
Duck Series. :)
Found this little munchkin munching on his afternoon snack
Enjoy. This was probably over a span of 30 seconds.

DSCN1105 by echoyjeff222, on Flickr

DSCN1106 by echoyjeff222, on Flickr

DSCN1107 by echoyjeff222, on Flickr

DSCN1108 by echoyjeff222, on Flickr
-
05-28-2012 09:03 PM # ADS
-
05-28-2012, 09:10 PM #2I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- WA
- Posts
- 336
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 12 times
sorry ... errr .. not a duck. hahahaa
-
05-28-2012, 09:33 PM #3Watch the Birdy! Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Southern Vancouver Island, BC
- Posts
- 17,140
- My Gallery
- (25)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 2625 times
When is a duck not a duck? Why, when it's a seagull of course!
Nice series, but I think a tighter crop on the bird and his supper would make them even stronger.
-
05-28-2012, 09:39 PM #4I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- WA
- Posts
- 336
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 12 times
you mean for all of them?
-
05-28-2012, 09:48 PM #5Watch the Birdy! Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Southern Vancouver Island, BC
- Posts
- 17,140
- My Gallery
- (25)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 2625 times
Yes, I'd crop them all the same, removing [approximately] the top half and the LH half.
-
05-28-2012, 09:58 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Old Town, ME
- Posts
- 2,708
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 338 times
I agree. The focus is on the bird eating that starfish, pretty cool capture...the extra, especially on top...to me is not necessary.
-
05-28-2012, 09:58 PM #7I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- WA
- Posts
- 336
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 12 times
so ignore the thirds?
-
05-28-2012, 10:00 PM #8Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Old Town, ME
- Posts
- 2,708
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 338 times
if you halved top and halved bottom as Iron suggested, it should still be in thirds. at times you can break the rules as well...all dependent on the shot. I would almost want to see the foliage on the bottom...however that may put bird right in middle...I am guessing which is why he suggested halving the bottom as well.
-
05-28-2012, 10:10 PM #9Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Old Town, ME
- Posts
- 2,708
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 338 times
Your thingy doesn't say if pics are ok or not to edit...so I hope this don't offend.
This kinda crop still follows the rot's. Just to give you an idea...certainly do it how you like it. It's yours afterall. :=_
I noticed that the bird isn't quite in focus after zooming, and I brought down the saturation a hair as well and left a bit of foliage. Still a neat pic though.
starfish1.jpg
-
05-28-2012, 10:13 PM #10I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- WA
- Posts
- 336
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 12 times
here they are. and yeah, i was about to say it gets out of focus if you zoom in hehe. i already had it totally zoomed in and my heart was pumping in the heat of the moment
hard to hold the camera still hahaha. a few are clearer than others, though. maybe just crop some? oh i like your crop more 

DSCN1108crop by echoyjeff222, on Flickr

DSCN1107crop by echoyjeff222, on Flickr

DSCN1106crop by echoyjeff222, on Flickr

DSCN1105 crop by echoyjeff222, on Flickr
-
05-28-2012, 10:14 PM #11I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- WA
- Posts
- 336
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 12 times
i think 1105 was the bluriest so maybe i'll leave that one normal
-
05-28-2012, 11:21 PM #12Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Old Town, ME
- Posts
- 2,708
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 338 times
The only real difference in mine and yours was you didn't pull in the left side of the pic to compensate, with that much dead space, try to make your image be within the right 2/3 of the image rather than the right 1/3, since there is nothing exciting to look at over there; and I did a bit of adjusting for the highlights kill..saturation kill...etc. Oh, and I left a little more on the top so you can see the full wave, not a cut wave as you have. I figured if we give them something to look at, might as well be the full thing..since we are only talking about centimeter at that point...if that.

Being new I understand it's hard to control emotion sometimes when you see something kinda cool. I guess, in time, we'll get better at it. :-)
-
05-29-2012, 11:12 AM #13I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- WA
- Posts
- 336
- My Gallery
- (1)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 12 times
HERE is the duck
(does it look like it's smiling ?? o.O)

DSCN1078 by echoyjeff222, on Flickr
Similar Threads
-
Duck... Duck... Goose... You're it!
By BuS_RiDeR in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 11-04-2010, 02:26 PM -
Duck, Duck, Geese!
By greatestfix in forum Nature & WildlifeReplies: 1Last Post: 04-04-2008, 12:43 AM -
Duck, Duck, Goose!
By greatestfix in forum Nature & WildlifeReplies: 3Last Post: 03-10-2008, 03:10 PM -
If it quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck....
By jon_k in forum Landscape & CityscapeReplies: 1Last Post: 08-21-2007, 11:18 PM -
Duck, Duck, Goose!
By WNK in forum Landscape & CityscapeReplies: 3Last Post: 04-26-2006, 04:39 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


