Results 1 to 15 of 21
Thread: HDR Church Shootout
-
07-05-2012, 11:37 AM #1Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Denmark
- Posts
- 125
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 4 times
HDR Church Shootout
Hi everyone!
Thought I wanted to share one of my recent photos from a danish church, mainly because I need inspiration from you guys, having seen some very neat HDR photos in here..
Here's my take on it; I've run it through HDR Efex Pro, but I cannot seem to get the neat painterly effect that I'm looking for. It's just not HDR'ish enough!
Is it because it's only taken with 3 exposures? Or because of the lighting in the church? OR (most probably) because I'm doing something wrong?

Anyways, I'm really looking forward to seeing what you can get out of it!
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28572597/HDR%20church.zipAnders Pedersen
NIKON D90
Nikkor 18-105 VR AF-S DX
Tokina 12-24 F/4 AT-X PRO DX
Manfrotto 7321YB tripod
Visit my SmugMug - Feel free to comment!
-
07-05-2012 11:37 AM # ADS
-
07-05-2012, 11:45 AM #2TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 3,121
- My Gallery
- (2)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 482 times
-
07-05-2012, 02:09 PM #3TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Tucson AZ.
- Posts
- 1,666
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 195 times
Here are three that I did.

cross processed

textured and effects
"IF YOU LOVE WHAT YOU ARE DOING, YOU WILL DO IT WELL"
For Sale Items - Nikon MC-DC2
Nikon D700 - Nikon MB-10 - Nikon SB700 - Nikon 14-24 2.8 - Nikon 50mm 1.8G - vivitar RC-200 remote - F4 Vanguard SBH 250 ball head - VANGUARD ALTA PRO 263AT TRIPODvisit my flickr HDR photos - http://flic.kr/s/aHsjwUnXU5
visit my flickr tonemapped photos - http://flic.kr/s/aHsjxSmrne
-
07-05-2012, 03:05 PM #4Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Just outside Toronto Canada
- Posts
- 2,804
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 369 times
More than 3 are needed. Really bright windows and lots of shadowy nooks and grannys in the church. (joke intended).
-
07-05-2012, 05:27 PM #5TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 3,121
- My Gallery
- (2)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 482 times
-
07-05-2012, 07:51 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Just outside Toronto Canada
- Posts
- 2,804
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 369 times
Anders when you pulled the top out to reduce the distortion you have to stretch the height to make up for this. The whole thing looks too square now.
As much as I didnt like the shot I tried a go at it.
-
07-06-2012, 12:33 AM #7Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Denmark
- Posts
- 125
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 4 times
Thanks for the inputs!
I'd really like to hear how you process HDR's?
I've used a lot of Photomatix earlier, but recently started using HDR Efex Pro - I'm not sure which I like the best...
vipgraphx:
Your first is really getting close to what I was striving for. How did you process it?
Maybe it's the tonemapping my photo needs, but if I turn up the "tonemapping" adjuster in HDR Efex Pro, it just looks wrong, dark and too contrasty..
Bynx:
Sorry that you didn't like the shot.
I'm sure you're right about the number of exposures, but lately when shooting I've only bracketed 3 photos if I feel the HDR-element could be interesting, but since my take on it almost looks like a "normal" exposed photo, I've been wondering why to do HDR at all. But I can see that maybe I'm doing something wrong.
I'd really like to hear what software you all use, since I've hit a bit of a wall with HDR..Anders Pedersen
NIKON D90
Nikkor 18-105 VR AF-S DX
Tokina 12-24 F/4 AT-X PRO DX
Manfrotto 7321YB tripod
Visit my SmugMug - Feel free to comment!
-
07-06-2012, 02:13 AM #8TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 3,121
- My Gallery
- (2)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 482 times
Photomatix: get as much detail as possible: flat low contrast image. I do stuff differently depending on wherher I want something clean or something slightly more cooked.
Load into photoshop. Hue/saturation, curves/levels, apply detail filter, crop/distortin and all that jazz.
Thanks bynx, so true. Why didn't I see that??
-
07-06-2012, 02:36 AM #9Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Denmark
- Posts
- 125
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 4 times
Yes, that's what I did earlier, maybe I should give it a spin again.
I just thought that HDR Efex Pro almost beat Photomatix these days, leaving it a bit outdated, but I guess that's not so.
Have anyone of you tried Topaz Adjust? It seems to have a very strong tonemapping module...?Anders Pedersen
NIKON D90
Nikkor 18-105 VR AF-S DX
Tokina 12-24 F/4 AT-X PRO DX
Manfrotto 7321YB tripod
Visit my SmugMug - Feel free to comment!
-
07-06-2012, 03:23 AM #10TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 3,121
- My Gallery
- (2)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 482 times
I use topaz plugins, but not adjust 4. I use detail for detail (duh!) and denoise for, well, you know. I'm not sure if those presets really is "tonemapping" oer definition. I think maybe that term is savef for specific algorithms. I wouldn't use it anyway, if I were you.
I haven't used efex, but I'm pretty sure photomatix isn't outdated, on the contrary.
-
07-06-2012, 07:13 AM #11Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Just outside Toronto Canada
- Posts
- 2,804
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 369 times
In my opinion Photomatix is still king for its ease of use and its quality output. The idea of doing HDR is to do an exposure for each different light source. So a bright window needs a short exposure than a mid tone light source which wont be as long as the shadows. But the brightest spot will probably be a lot more than 1 fstop from your midtones and a lot more than 2fstops from your shadow areas. In the case of the church I'd say 7 shots might cover it.
-
07-06-2012, 09:59 AM #12Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Utah
- Posts
- 190
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 7 times
Here is my take on it.
Photomatix, Photoshop, Topaz Adjust, Topaz Denoise, Minor touchups
-
07-06-2012, 10:55 AM #13Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Just outside Toronto Canada
- Posts
- 2,804
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 369 times
Nos33 why did you blow out the whole center strip of floor? There was detail there? Also your shadow areas are black. Your method clearly doesnt work.
Last edited by Bynx; 07-06-2012 at 11:04 AM.
-
07-06-2012, 11:55 AM #14Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Utah
- Posts
- 190
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 7 times
I was trying to capture the scene as a whole. I must have missed those little details.
-
07-06-2012, 12:11 PM #15Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Just outside Toronto Canada
- Posts
- 2,804
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 369 times
Then you are missing the point of HDR. Its to capture all those details. Any single shot will capture the scene as a whole.
Similar Threads
-
HDR SHOOTOUT Roman CHurch
By JRE313 in forum HDR DiscussionsReplies: 17Last Post: 06-25-2012, 01:30 AM -
HDR Shootout #31
By Bynx in forum HDR DiscussionsReplies: 27Last Post: 09-13-2011, 07:03 AM -
HDR Shootout #18
By 480sparky in forum HDR DiscussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 05-20-2011, 08:45 AM -
hdr Shootout #14
By Provo in forum HDR DiscussionsReplies: 10Last Post: 05-04-2011, 05:53 PM -
HDR Shootout....... I think we're up to #15 now.
By 480sparky in forum HDR DiscussionsReplies: 13Last Post: 05-02-2011, 07:20 PM
Search tags for this page
50mm 1.8 nikon effects
,nikon 50mm 1.8g distortion
Click on a term to search for related topics.




3Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


