Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: CXS Train#6131
-
07-10-2012, 06:01 PM #1I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 324
- My Gallery
- (3)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 45 times
CXS Train#6131
I need opinions on this photo.
Here i have 2 photos go the same train.
I want to ask which sky is the best?
Here is just a normal sky.

Here is a sky with a Nik Software filter called Detail Extractor.
JRE313's Equipment
Canon T3I Rebel
Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM lens
Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II LD SP Aspherical (IF) Zoom Lens
Nikon D7000
Tamron SP AF 10-24mm F/3.5-4.5 Di LL Lens
Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR ED Lens
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/71336639@N06/
-
07-10-2012 06:01 PM # ADS
-
07-10-2012, 06:25 PM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Just outside Toronto Canada
- Posts
- 2,804
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 369 times
I much prefer the second one. The main problem I have with both images is the outline between the train and the sky. You should also watch when small areas are enclosed like those areas on the left side of railings to help get up the steps. The other thing I really find disturbing is the slant of the train. It looks like its about to fall over. Im sure if the walls of the train were vertical all would be well with the world.
-
07-10-2012, 07:47 PM #3TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Tucson AZ.
- Posts
- 1,672
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 196 times
I think both sky's are to soft for the other processing that is going on. Also that halo line in both that Bynx mentioned is killing it.
The small areas that Bynx referred to I would have to agree this is where you need to using masking to fix those areas.
Problem with wide angle lenses is sometimes the distortion works for the photo and sometimes it does not. In this case I think it works against it and some lens correction would have helped you."IF YOU LOVE WHAT YOU ARE DOING, YOU WILL DO IT WELL"
For Sale Items - Nikon MC-DC2
Nikon D700 - Nikon MB-10 - Nikon SB700 - Nikon 14-24 2.8 - Nikon 50mm 1.8G - vivitar RC-200 remote - F4 Vanguard SBH 250 ball head - VANGUARD ALTA PRO 263AT TRIPODvisit my flickr HDR photos - http://flic.kr/s/aHsjwUnXU5
visit my flickr tonemapped photos - http://flic.kr/s/aHsjxSmrne
-
07-11-2012, 12:52 AM #4I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 324
- My Gallery
- (3)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 45 times
What do u mean by too soft??
JRE313's Equipment
Canon T3I Rebel
Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM lens
Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II LD SP Aspherical (IF) Zoom Lens
Nikon D7000
Tamron SP AF 10-24mm F/3.5-4.5 Di LL Lens
Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR ED Lens
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/71336639@N06/
-
07-11-2012, 01:12 AM #5TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Tucson AZ.
- Posts
- 1,672
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 196 times
You had to use some type of noise reduction in the sky. Or what ever filter you used made the clouds soft in both photos. If you are using topaz adjust for any of your filters do you have the noise reduction on? Are you using Topaz Denoise or any other noise reduction?
Here is an example
This has no noise reduction added tot he sky. Look at the clouds you can see detail

This has noise reduction added to it. look how soft the clouds are. Loss of detail along with the trees.

When I look at this image the train seems nice and sharp with detail and then in the sky it looks like you lost that detail.
Here I used noise reduction for the sky but created a duplicate layer and then I brought down the opacity of the noise reduction layer so it was not so soft. This is an actual 3 exposed handheld HDR not a single image. I think this was a good use of noise reduction for the sky.

stands by VIPGraphX, on Flickr
Now in this picture I think I had poor use of noise reduction. Do you notice how the sky does not match the rest of the image. Look at some of the lower branches where it took the noise reduction it lost detail. Now look at the sky closer to the horizon and you see how the clouds got really soft and lost detail....This is what I mean with your image.....

trail to lake by VIPGraphX, on FlickrLast edited by vipgraphx; 07-11-2012 at 01:27 AM.
"IF YOU LOVE WHAT YOU ARE DOING, YOU WILL DO IT WELL"
For Sale Items - Nikon MC-DC2
Nikon D700 - Nikon MB-10 - Nikon SB700 - Nikon 14-24 2.8 - Nikon 50mm 1.8G - vivitar RC-200 remote - F4 Vanguard SBH 250 ball head - VANGUARD ALTA PRO 263AT TRIPODvisit my flickr HDR photos - http://flic.kr/s/aHsjwUnXU5
visit my flickr tonemapped photos - http://flic.kr/s/aHsjxSmrne
Similar Threads
-
The train
By cpeay in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 06-09-2011, 05:06 PM -
Hi from a train
By clementblain in forum Welcomes and IntroductionsReplies: 0Last Post: 03-25-2011, 03:36 AM -
Train!
By TylerxE in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 10-08-2009, 11:03 AM -
Train!
By A.S.H.rimp in forum General GalleryReplies: 3Last Post: 02-05-2009, 09:48 PM -
train!
By rmphoto in forum General GalleryReplies: 11Last Post: 03-02-2005, 05:51 PM
Search tags for this page
20mm af 2.8
,canon t3i 50mm
,csx sky
,photo with sigma af 17-50mm f/2.8 ex dc hsm
,sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 ex dc hsm sample shots
,tamron wide angle sp af 17-50mm f/2.8 xr di ii ld
,what does a cxstrain look like
Click on a term to search for related topics.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
