Results 1 to 15 of 17
Thread: Common Grackle Black on Black
-
07-11-2012, 09:46 PM #1TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Ontario
- Posts
- 3,520
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1199 times
Common Grackle Black on Black
We have had a bird population boom around here and there are a plethora of these Grackles around right now. I've always had a hard time with black birds so I figured I would mess around with them on different backgrounds and see what I could come up with.
This one is my favourite so far
It has a unique quality to it with a bit of grain in the background and how "slick" the bird looks.
C&C always welcome and appreciated.
1/1000
F8
ISO1600
-
07-11-2012 09:46 PM # ADS
-
07-11-2012, 09:52 PM #2TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Cleveland, Ohio
- Posts
- 12,698
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 4591 times
I
this one!
-
07-12-2012, 03:06 AM #3I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Wisconsin, United States
- Posts
- 446
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 53 times
I love the composition of this one, it makes me feel like the bird is acutely aware, and ready to make haste in a moments notice.
C&C, as per your request: I, personally don't think the grain adds to this photo. I doesn't make it appealing to me. Looking at your EXIF data, you had your ISO WAY up there, giving you a light speed shutter speed of 1/1000 sec. In a scene like this, you could probably have reduced your ISO by more than half, which would bring your shutter speed down, as well, but more importantly, eliminating much of that grain, caused by digital noise. This could also be removed in Post, but it's always better to prevent it first. I Would think you could have reduced you ISO to 200, or what ever the lowest native setting is, and still had a shutter speed at or near 1/200 sec, which would have likely stopped any motion blur, and not captured the noise. I also felt a tighter crop was in order. See below..
I saw your photos were ok to edit, so I hope it was ok that I took a stab at it, if not, I can take it down. Even though I had a small file to start with, I still made some ok changes. I cropped some of the image out, to put the bird more on a third. In this case he crosses the top horizontal third and right vertical third. I feel like this edit makes the bird pop a little more, yet still keeping some of the context with the background. Though, the beauty is often in the eye of the beholder! Feel free to not like my edit!
[ Nikon D5000 ]
[ Assorted Lenses and Flashy Thingies ]
[ Various levels of ambition - weather dependent]
"Whoa, did everything just taste purple for a second?" ~ Fry
-
07-12-2012, 08:47 AM #4TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Ontario
- Posts
- 3,520
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1199 times
Thanks Bitter
<3
Thank you Crimbfighter! I appreciate your C&C, I'm going to ponder it for a bit before I respond
-
07-12-2012, 09:31 AM #5TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Cleveland, Ohio
- Posts
- 12,698
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 4591 times
On the edit, losing so much of the secondary compositional elements, kills the image.
-
07-12-2012, 12:01 PM #6TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Ontario
- Posts
- 3,520
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1199 times
First I want to say thank you again for taking the time to C&C and edit for me
I can see where you were going with your vision and edit, I do like how slick these birds are and your edit really brings that out. Unfortunately it also brings out a smoothness in the black "wall" (it is actually the back of a fountain) behind him and totally smooths out the rocks, all of the texture I planned to get in the entire BG is gone, it's all smooth now... like the bird. I have shot these guys a crazy number of times and that "smooth on smooth/bokeh" is what I was trying to get away from since I have a bazillion shots like that.
Another reason I wanted a higher shutter speed is how these birds move, they are random and jerky in their movement and very flighty, anything lower than 1/500 and you end up with way more throwaways, at about 1/1000 I can get those moments of takeoff etc...(there was method to my madness!)
I do see the charm of your smoothing and think it has merit as an option but it just wasn't the option I was aiming for this time around
As for the crop, I don't like it
It takes away everything I set up to be there for when the bird walked into the "sweet spot".
The textures of the seeds/wood on the bottom, grain in the black, texture in the rocks all were important to my intention of the shot, I wanted ONLY the Grackle to be smooth and offset and balanced by the textures and shapes around him, by eliminating most of the rocks and wood it's all gone and unbalanced to me now.
I appreciate your C&C despite us not being on the same page. It gave me the opportunity to go back through my process and thoughts while creating this shot and really be critical about my vision and execution and that is very cool
-
07-12-2012, 12:09 PM #7Bug Junkie
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Arvada Co
- Posts
- 14,465
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 3445 times
Oops.... commented on your Flickr page, and forgot to here!
Very nice! I agree with Bitter about the edit.. I like the original that was posted. Love the lighting in this... and the way it highlights the subject, and give great background separation!
Good Capture!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm Charlie! Who are you?
Nikon D800 / D7000, R1C1 Macro Flash, SB-900 x2, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200 2.8, 85 1.4, 50 1.4, 105 2.8 macro, TC20E 2x TC / TC14E 1.4x TC, Monolights, Pocket Wizards, etc.....
Flickr Images

500px Images
-
07-12-2012, 12:42 PM #8TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
- Ontario
- Posts
- 3,520
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1199 times
Thanks Charlie
-
07-12-2012, 02:20 PM #9TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Posts
- 3,243
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 425 times
I like the original composition and the noise doesn't bother me, but the area in the upper left seems a bit too bright to me. You could darken it some without losing the textures and shapes and then it would not compete with the bird in brightness; it would recede more into the background. Same for that spot under its tail.
Very nice image in any case. Is this a young one? Usually they are darker than this in the summer.
-
07-12-2012, 04:58 PM #10TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Posts
- 1,305
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 145 times
Nice shot Pixel!
It reminds me of a Robert Bateman painting for some reason.~Serena~
Minolta X-700, Maxxam 7000i, Minolta AutoCord TLR, Minolta Autowide, Minolta-35, Minolta Semi Model P, Sony A55
"Art without engineering is dreaming, engineering without art is calculating." S.K.Roberts
-
07-12-2012, 05:24 PM #11TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- minnesota
- Posts
- 3,331
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 581 times
I like the original edit better. I feel I would like to see a few cm on the bottom of the image though. I feel it might create more balance with the background elements. I am not sure though, I would have to see it first.
Best regards,
jake
-
07-12-2012, 08:01 PM #12I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Wisconsin, United States
- Posts
- 446
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 53 times
After hearing more about what and why you were trying to capture the image the way you did, I see why my edit is complete sheet, and subsequently ruined everything you were going for.. I hope I didn't offend, either. I tend to explain things to the n-th degree for no apparent reason, haha.. I consider myself corrected!
Last edited by crimbfighter; 07-12-2012 at 08:19 PM.
[ Nikon D5000 ]
[ Assorted Lenses and Flashy Thingies ]
[ Various levels of ambition - weather dependent]
"Whoa, did everything just taste purple for a second?" ~ Fry
-
07-12-2012, 08:13 PM #13TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Mid-Atlantic US
- Posts
- 8,575
- My Gallery
- (63)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1874 times
This may be a common grackle but I don't think they are common in my yard so, as far as I am concerned, it is an un-common grackle.
That being said it is a very nice capture and I love the composition.
What do you think of lowering the intensity of the light on the gravel? It seems a bit strong and gets attention when it needn't.
Lew
Latest blog post - What is Street Photograph - and what it isn't.
Pictures and a new totally renovated blog about photography, travel and even the occasional political rant at http://lewlortonphoto.com

-
07-13-2012, 12:39 AM #14TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Southern Alberta, Canada
- Posts
- 2,043
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 163 times
Nice shot. I like that you got the eye and that the bird is quite sharp and well-defined against the background. Thanks for sharing.
______________
WesternGuyThe question is not what you look at, but what you see. (Henry David Thoreau)
My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/westernguy/
My new blog: http://photowestguy.wordpress.com/
-
07-13-2012, 05:54 AM #15TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 3,228
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1090 times
Judi, those birds are tough to shoot well. You did an excellent job and other than Lew's lowering the brightness of the gravel, everything else (composition, posing, lighting, focusing) works. The eye is clear, the way the light falls on its back is wonderful in delineating the shape and separating the bird from the background, and your choice of background seems very appropriate. Again, I'm just echoing the earlier comments for the most part. The only niggle for me is that I'd love to see the image at higher resolution.
Put the important things in important places
Compose to minimize dead space and things that distract from the center of interest - the important things
Process to minimize faults and maximize good points.
by Lew Lorton, aka The_Traveller.
Similar Threads
-
Common Grackle Flying Across the River
By PixelRabbit in forum Nature & WildlifeReplies: 5Last Post: 06-22-2012, 10:11 AM -
Common Grackle.
By Bynx in forum Nature & WildlifeReplies: 7Last Post: 06-09-2012, 10:14 AM -
Common Grackle
By ScubaDude in forum Nature & WildlifeReplies: 10Last Post: 05-17-2012, 11:32 AM -
Black on Black (NSFW Link inside)
By ghache in forum People PhotographyReplies: 14Last Post: 02-29-2012, 05:51 PM -
White White Girl With A Black Black Soul ~ Black Crystal
By JohnKokWithAdSLR in forum People PhotographyReplies: 4Last Post: 02-23-2011, 03:05 AM




8Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



