Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: 35mm Vs. 85mm

  1. #1
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    7,795
    My Gallery
    (2)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1658 times

    35mm Vs. 85mm

    I'm torn between two choices for a next lens. I want something super fast for indoor event photography.

    The

    Amazon.com: Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S FX SWM Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras: Electronics

    and the

    Amazon.com: Nikon 85mm f/1.4G AF-S Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR: Electronics

    Equip:

    D700
    17-35, 24-70, 70-200 f2.8s. I do have a nifty 50 too

    Purpose, indoors (chapels, churches, banquet rooms, etc) when flash isn't permitted or not feasible.

    I feel I'd get more use (portraits) with the 85 but it might be a little too long for indoor use. Want to hear from you that use one or the other or both for similar purposes. Gracias!



  2. #2
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    13,385
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1827 times
    Two different lenses with two different purposes. Apples and orangatans. There is no comparison, only what your intent is.
    The Liver is Evil and Must Be Punished.
    Shooter of FX, DX and MFT

    We boogied in the kitchen
    We
    boogied in the hall
    I got something on my finger
    So I wiped it on the wall

    Chuck Berry - Reelin' and Rockin' - Lancaster Arts Festival 1972

  3. #3
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,923
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    330 times
    I use my 85 and 35 both for indoor portraits, but they each take very different portraits!

    You have both of these focal lengths covered already, so set one of your zooms to 35 and walk around for a day to get a feel, and then do the same with 85.

    One thing worth noting is that for low light, you can technically get away with a slower shutter speed on the 35, so it is slightly better in low light, despite them both being 1.4.
    60d, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 24 1.4L II, Zeiss 35 1.4 Distagon, Zeiss 50 2.0 Makro-Planar, Canon 85 1.8, Yashica DX 135 2.8, flashy stuff, filtery stuff

  4. #4
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    7,795
    My Gallery
    (2)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1658 times
    So you think the 35mm then?

    Seriously though, if you were shooting a birthday indoors with dim lighting...?


    Edit:I type too slow... good point about shorter focal length/slower handheld ss.

  5. #5
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,923
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    330 times
    If you're having this much trouble deciding then you clearly need both!


    For real though, spend a day or 2 just shooting at 35 and 85, it'll be much easier to make up your mind.

    I like the 35 if I'm actually at conversation distance, and interacting with whoever I'm shooting. The 85 is more of an across the room lens...
    60d, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 24 1.4L II, Zeiss 35 1.4 Distagon, Zeiss 50 2.0 Makro-Planar, Canon 85 1.8, Yashica DX 135 2.8, flashy stuff, filtery stuff

  6. #6
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    13,385
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1827 times
    I have the 35mm f/2 and the 85mm f/1.8. Both work splendidly on the D700. I have also tested the 85mm f/1.4 G & D mount lenses with the D700. The G does have some advantages, but I'm not certain that the price point difference is well founded.
    The Liver is Evil and Must Be Punished.
    Shooter of FX, DX and MFT

    We boogied in the kitchen
    We
    boogied in the hall
    I got something on my finger
    So I wiped it on the wall

    Chuck Berry - Reelin' and Rockin' - Lancaster Arts Festival 1972

  7. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    10,291
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2088 times
    It is all about what lens you want mounted the MOST at an event/wedding with 2 camera bodies. With 2 camera bodies you usually want one short one long. If I had 35, 24-70, and 17-35, I will never use the 24-70 at these events (thats why I sold it). I will stick with 35mm because being able to go bigger than 2.8 is a big plus. At weddings when everyone started dancing, you will find that 35mm is not wide enough. Since you have 17-35, that is what I will use. Same goes with the long lens. I probably will never get rid the 70-200. But I must say if I had the fast 85 mm, I probably wont use the 70-200 as much if I can get pretty close to the subject at the ceremony. I think both 35 and 85 are necessary, but I personally would get the 35 first because you will use it more than the 85. When you do portraits, the 70-200 is awesome, but it is just ridiculously big. GL! It is always a tough choice!
    Trever1t likes this.
    USAGANI.COM - FACEBOOK
    5D3, 5D2, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 35 f/1.4L, 50 f/1.4, Minolta 58 f/1.2, Tamron 90 f/2.8 macro, 135 f/2L
    Fuji x100s

  8. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    7,795
    My Gallery
    (2)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1658 times
    Yes it is a tough choice, thanks for the feedback guys.

  9. #9
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    North Sydney
    Posts
    26
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    2 times
    IMO, 85mm is the one. And rather than 35mm, i would go to 24mm instead...

    Sent from my iPad using PhotoForum
    Body : Nikon D300 & Canon 60D
    Nikon Lens : 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G VR DX, 70-200mm f/2.8G VR, 50mm f/1.4G, 35mm f/1.8G DX
    Canon Lens : 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
    Flash : SB900 & 580EXII
    Other : MB-D10, B+W CPL 77mm, Indisystem Standard Rig, iShoot wireless system
    Post Productiom : OS X.6, Win7U, MBP 15" Mid 2009, CS5 MC, Aperture 3, iLife '11, iPad 2

  10. #10
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    10,291
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2088 times
    Yeah.. 24 is money too. I can totally shoot a whole wedding with only 24 and 85.
    USAGANI.COM - FACEBOOK
    5D3, 5D2, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 35 f/1.4L, 50 f/1.4, Minolta 58 f/1.2, Tamron 90 f/2.8 macro, 135 f/2L
    Fuji x100s

  11. #11
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    minnesota
    Posts
    3,504
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    685 times
    I'll go another route and say save up a bit and grab a 200mm f2.

  12. #12
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    10,291
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2088 times
    U r crazy Jake. 200 will not be used at weddings.
    USAGANI.COM - FACEBOOK
    5D3, 5D2, 15mm f/2.8 fisheye, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 35 f/1.4L, 50 f/1.4, Minolta 58 f/1.2, Tamron 90 f/2.8 macro, 135 f/2L
    Fuji x100s

  13. #13
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    300 times
    I just got the 85mm 1.4 af-d about 3 weeks ago. I only did 1 shoot with it but i LOVE that lens. the image quality is just unreal + the bokeh is awesome.

    it all comes down what your going to do with it, indoor, get the 24 as some people said. the 85 will be a bit long.

  14. #14
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    7,500
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    479 times
    If it's event photography, either the 24 or 35mm. I shot a wedding Saturday and the only two lenses I used were the 24 f/1.4 and 50 f/1.4, and they turned out awesome.

    If you're the type who likes to get in on the action, 24mm. If you want something for context, but don't want the wide look, 35mm. Otherwise use a 50 or 85mm.

    The 24G is razor sharp in the center wide open
    The 35G is OK at f/1.4, but not stellar in sharpness until f/2. Bokeh is tremendous at 1.4 though, really smooth.
    the 50G is OK at f/1.4, not super till f/2.
    the 85G is pretty good at f/1.4, but looks it's best at about f/2 as well in terms of sharpness/bokeh ratios.
    Last edited by Sw1tchFX; 08-25-2011 at 07:11 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by sm4him View Post
    What's the difference between an artist and a large pizza?

    The pizza can feed a family of four.

  15. #15
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    142
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    12 times
    I love love love the 85. Shot a whole concert series with that lens that I borrowed from school one time and it was low light, no flash allowed, and they still turned out wonderfully! I actually bought the 35/1.8 however, and that is a great lens, but I think I would have been a tad happier with the 85. Who am I kidding, a "tad"? I would be way happier with the 85. I just made myself sad...


    Just a note, I'm talking about two lenses that are different f-stops from the ones you mentioned, both at 1.8, but the lengths are the meat of this post.
    "In the meantime, I just take a little more courage and a little more perseverance and quite frankly, take as many drugs as I can." Excerpt from Joao Silva's speech at the Bronx Documentary Center after losing both legs to a landmine in Afghanistan.


    Nikon D300s
    Nikkor 35/1.8 DX (For Sale)
    Nikkor 50/1.8 DX
    Nikkor 10.5/2.8 Fisheye DX
    Nikkor 18-105/3.5 DX (For Sale)
    Holga 120N (For Sale)
    Polaroid One-Button
    Borrowed Mamiya 7 w/ 80mm

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. The Tokina 35mm f2.8 macro lens - Value as a standard 35mm lens?
    By Overread in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-17-2011, 02:34 PM
  2. Nikon 85mm f/1.4G vs Sigma 85mm f/1.4
    By RalphP13 in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-20-2011, 07:50 AM
  3. Nikon 35mm f/1.8 vs 35mm f/1.4
    By RalphP13 in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-04-2011, 09:52 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2010, 01:25 PM
  5. Canon 35mm F2 or 85mm F1.8????? Ideas?????
    By oldnavy170 in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-01-2007, 11:49 AM

Search tags for this page

35 mm lens opposed to 85mm lens
,
35 mm vs 85 mm
,
35mm or 85mm
,

35mm vs 85mm

,
85mm 1.4 vs 35mm 1.4 nikon
,
85mm or 35mm
,
85mm vs 35mm
,
difference between 35mm and 85mm lens
Click on a term to search for related topics.