Results 1 to 13 of 13
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By mcleish

Thread: Telephoto Lens help.

  1. #1
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    83
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    19 times

    Telephoto Lens help.

    Hey all. Sorry if this has been discussed before.

    I currently own a 55-300 which I think is an ok lens, but not for sports. Its slow a focusing which makes it difficult at getting the action shots.
    Im wanting to upgrade but unsure what to get. Ive looked at the 70-200 vr2 which I've read is a pretty good zoom lens, which could be a possibility, but i think i may miss the extra 100mm. My budget i reckon will be around $2500, so i was wondering if there is a lens that matches the 70-200 performance but with the extra 100mm?

  2. # ADS
    Ads
    Google Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

  3. #2
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Portland,Or.
    Posts
    971
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    73 times
    For which camera body? As the body will have more impact on faster AF acquisition and lock then the lenses. As more capable camera with more AF sensors and Better AF detection will be suited for sports. And sports requires fast body and fast lenses.

    If you are talking entry type cameras like D3xxx or D5xxx series than that's the problem right there. And would look to upgrade body.
    .
    Present Kit: D90 with MB-D80 grip 35mm f1.8G AF-S Sigma 10-20 Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G AF-S VR

    My Portfolio
    My Flickr
    My D40/D60 Blog

  4. #3
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    32,224
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1264 times
    Also, what time of day (lighting) do you most often shoot in? If you're always shooting in daylight, then you might be able to get away with a lens that has a smaller maximum aperture or maybe a faster lens with a teleconverter. Also, if your camera can handle higher ISO, that would help.
    Typically sports lenses have a max aperture of F4 or F2.8, but with modern cameras being so good at higher ISO, you can get away with a less expensive lens...I would think.

    For example, you could get the 70-200mm F2.8 and then add a 1.4X or 1.7X teleconverter to give you more reach when you need it.

    Nikon has a great 200-400mm lens, but it's really expensive. If you really need the reach, you might look at Sigma's 150-500mm or 50-500mm.
    There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada. Actually, as the artist gets more into his thing, and as he gets more successful, his number of tools tends to go down. He knows what works for him. Expending mental energy on stuff wastes time.
    Hugh Macleod
    Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
    Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre.

  5. #4
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    83
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    19 times
    Thanks for the quick replies.

    I have a D90. Lens wise i have a 50 1.8, tokina 12-24 and the 55-300. The 50 and 12-24 are really quick at focusing so i can't say its the body? I like the idea of the 70-200 with a teleconverter. Is there a drop in quality once you add that though?
    As of now I've mainly shot in daylight but id like the option of shooting at night if the chance came up.

  6. #5
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    881
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    80 times
    Yes, a teleconverter will cause a drop in quality, and a drop in maximum aperture as well.

    Even with the teleconverter, the 70-200mm will still be better than cheap telephoto lenses, though. And it still have the fast autofocus.
    Nikon D5100 + AF-S DX Nikkor 35m f/1.8G + AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED

  7. #6
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    32,224
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1264 times
    I like the idea of the 70-200 with a teleconverter. Is there a drop in quality once you add that though?
    Yes, the quality will be affected, but with a high quality teleconverter, it shouldn't be much of an issue.
    There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada. Actually, as the artist gets more into his thing, and as he gets more successful, his number of tools tends to go down. He knows what works for him. Expending mental energy on stuff wastes time.
    Hugh Macleod
    Edmonton Wedding Photographer ==>Blog
    Instructor at The Canadian Photography Learning Centre.

  8. #7
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    83
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    19 times
    Man those teleconverters aren't cheap! $500 give or take for a nikon x2. I reckon ill take the dive for the 70-200... see how it goes and get a teleconverter if needed. Thanks for the help.
    Derrel likes this.

  9. #8
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Portland,Or.
    Posts
    971
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    73 times
    Yep shot an nikon 80-200 f2.8 AF-D with a tamron 1.4x and became a 120-280mm f4 with minimum impact hits in Image IQ and speed.

    But seen outstanding shots with the 70-200 f2.8 and using a 1.7x and 2.0x. 1.7x would make a 340 f5 kind of setup. or 2.0x for 400mm f5.6.
    .
    Present Kit: D90 with MB-D80 grip 35mm f1.8G AF-S Sigma 10-20 Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G AF-S VR

    My Portfolio
    My Flickr
    My D40/D60 Blog

  10. #9
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    518
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    37 times
    If you don't need zoom capability there's also the 300mm f/4 but it has no VR. You might also look at the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8. It's a bit higher than your budget but you might be able to find one used and it's a good lens by most accounts.
    You can call me Jim.

    Nikon D7000 : 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR DX : 50mm f/1.8D : 300mm f/4 AF-S w/Kenko 1.4 Teleplus Pro 300 DGX : Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro : Meike battery grip (to be replaced with Nikon) w/ second EN-EL15
    ---
    Nikon D50 backup body : 28-80mm kit lens

  11. #10
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    239
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    22 times
    If you are shooting sports from a distance, you cannot beat the speed of manual focus. Practice a lot. If you are shooting from the same spot each and every time, you will eventually get a feel for where to focus from different focus lengths, especially with sports like football where there are marks on the ground that can help give you a reference.
    -Tony

  12. #11
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    83
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    19 times
    Thanks for the info everybody. Im still thinking of going for the 70-200. I know its a good piece of glass and ill be able to use it for other things too. I may rent one out and see how i feel about the focal distance. Then i may add a 1.4 teleconverter too.

  13. #12
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    239
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    22 times
    More often than not, the answer to getting the right shot lies with acquiring new skills, not gear.
    -Tony

  14. #13
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    83
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    19 times
    Thanks Tony.

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. telephoto lens help
    By wvmike in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-30-2011, 04:43 PM
  2. Telephoto Lens
    By Alex_Bergshoeff in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-04-2011, 12:29 PM
  3. Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS Telephoto Zoom Lens: Is it a Good Lens?
    By cesar in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-15-2011, 10:38 PM
  4. 58mm camera lens - 2.0x TelePhoto Conversion Lens
    By Link Delight Online Shop in forum Linkdelight Photography Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-11-2010, 09:40 PM
  5. Looking at a Telephoto Lens
    By xjrrrdx in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-04-2010, 12:44 PM

Search tags for this page

how to shoot football pictures at night with a nikon d90 using a 70-200 f2.0 lens

,

telephoto lens help

Click on a term to search for related topics.