Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wash. Dc
    Posts
    47
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2 times

    AF tracking - 11/39/51 points - real world differences

    hi all,

    I'm wondering what the real-world differences are between the 39 point focus and 51 point focus for action/sports. I've read conflicting opinions about the two - some saying the 39 point (D7000) is just as fast or faster than the 51 point (D300s).

    Has anyone here used both and can you comment on the actual differences seen from shooting both.


    Thanks....



  2. #2
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    13,385
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1826 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Caps View Post
    I'm wondering what the real-world differences are between the 39 point focus and 51 point focus for action/sports. ....
    12 points.


    My Nikon bodies have 9, 21 & 51 AF points, but 99% of the time I have it set to 21. I don't shoot a lot of action / sports, but the times I have 21 seems to be fine for me and have set it to 9 just to reduce the amount of AF point adjustment. Anticipation of the action is the key, methinks. 51 point might be okay with the dynamic tracking. The best bet is to try them all out and see which one fits you better.
    The Liver is Evil and Must Be Punished.
    Shooter of FX, DX and MFT

    We boogied in the kitchen
    We
    boogied in the hall
    I got something on my finger
    So I wiped it on the wall

    Chuck Berry - Reelin' and Rockin' - Lancaster Arts Festival 1972

  3. #3
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wash. Dc
    Posts
    47
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2 times
    12 points.

    Maybe I'm not asking the question correctly. Is there a difference between the different tracking systems in terms of quality? I'm sure it's possible to make different quality tracking systems with missles (the old man was a scientist), so surely its possible with a camera range finder.

  4. #4
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,083
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    297 times
    The simple answer is:

    For Auto Focusing... It gives the camera more choices to focus on.
    For User Select Focusing... It gives the human (you) more choices to focus on.

    The more complex answer:

    Its not about how many points, its about the entire auto focus system. The Multi-CAM 3500FX system in the D4/D800 is faster and more robust then the Multi-CAM 4800DX in the D7000. The 51 point system also gives you 15 cross type sensors while the 39 point system only gives you 9.

    In real-world-shooting i hit the limits of the D7000's focus system all the time. Its why LOTS of people have stayed with the D300/D300s and it's Multi-CAM 3500DX AF system (faster and more accurate).



    In a nutshell... its the system as a whole and not just the number of points

  5. #5
    KmH
    KmH is offline
    Helping photographers learn to fish
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    33,511
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    3898 times
    The D7000 Multi-CAM 4800 AF module is newer but only has 9 cross-type focus points, and has a lower light limit of -1 EV.

    The older Multi-CAM 3500 AF module has 15 cross-type focus sensors, and also has a lower light limit of -1 EV. Note that Nikon's flagship, pro grade D4, and the prosumer grade D800, both use the newer version of the Multi-CAM 3500 AF module that has a lower low light limit at -2 EV.

    Both are phase-detection systems whose speed is limited by the lens focus motor, not the electronics of the focus module. Many of Nikon's fastest focusing lenses are the older screw-drive, AF designated lenses, that rely on the auto focus motor in the camera body.

    AF-S lenses don't have a physical connection to that in the camera screw-drive focusing system, and can only use the AF motor in an AF-S lens.
    Last edited by KmH; 02-19-2013 at 11:51 AM.
    . . . . . . Keith . . . . . . .How Do I Use My Digital SLR?...
    Effort equals results - Roger Penske

  6. #6
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wash. Dc
    Posts
    47
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2 times
    Great info guys....thanks.

    I wasn't sure about upgrading to a used D300 (like buying an older outdated computer) but now I'm okay with it.

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. DxOMark vs real world shots?
    By jaomul in forum Digital Discussion & Q&A
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-15-2011, 03:42 AM
  2. Real world 1D Mark IV pictures
    By inTempus in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-23-2009, 10:54 AM
  3. real world critique
    By mysteryscribe in forum Photographic Discussions
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-30-2007, 04:48 PM
  4. Finally stepping into the real world!
    By Mitica100 in forum Off Topic Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-12-2007, 03:03 PM
  5. Can someone explain what the real differences are between
    By railman44 in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-03-2005, 08:44 PM

Search tags for this page

39 af points vs 51 af points

,

39 focus points vs 11 focus points

,
39 vs 51 focus points nikon
,

51 focus points vs 39

,
nikon 11-af vs. 39-af
,
nikon 39 or 51 focus
,
nikon 39 point af vs 51 point af
,

nikon 39 vs 51 focus points

Click on a term to search for related topics.