-
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
UK Wedding Photographer Sued
-
10-06-2009 08:25 AM
# ADS
-
Not quite sure what to think of this. I'd really need to see all of the pictures to judge whether the right decision was made here.
Though, this is the most painful line in the article...
But how hard can it be to get great shots at a happy occasion, where everyone is dressed up in picturesque locations? Most guests bring along their own cameras, after all.
...and I don't think I need to explain why.
If you want to judge my credibility as a photographer, don't look at my post count, look at my photography:

www.eppbphoto.com
Nikon D7000 | Nikon D40 | Tokina 11-16 | 35/1.8 | 50/1.8 | 55-200 VR | SB-600 | Alienbees Cybersyncs
-
Been spending a lot of time on here!
The memorable shots from Marc and Sylvia Day's wedding are unusual, to say the least. Decapitated guests, a ceremony hardly visible through the gloom, and random close-ups of... not the bouquet, or a snatched kiss, but of carriage wheels. The three-year-old bridesmaid - caught in one snap without her clothes on - could have done a better job.
It certainly sounds bad, but does the contract specify that the clients must be happy? If not, you can certainly claim incompetence, but at least in this country that's not enough to meet the corpus delicti requirements of any crime that I'm aware of. Sadly, people are indeed free to be incompetent, and even make claims to the effect that they are not...
- Randy
-
Not sure the lawsuit is warranted, or legal, but if you take a look at the 2 shots they show on the page, they're pretty bad, especially when there were probably a couple amateurs in there getting better shots. (Usually you'll find at least a couple people practicing)


joedombrowski.com last updated 9/16/2011
Nikon D300, IR modified D70, FE2, 2020 and a gaggle of lenses
Fight Club: Play - Vote
Previous Winner: Still Voting
(Links last updated 3/5/2012)