-
My site, my Blurb store
Hi all.
Long time member, less active these days, but still grateful for everything I learned here.
My site is Roth-Photo.com, please come by and see my work.
I recently released two books. I hope you like what you see, and that you buy one of each. I'm very proud of them, and would love to give one to every person I meet... but two years of work are clearly visible, I hope.
Blurb - The Americans
Blurb - Hanjo
Thanks for taking the time to look.
...oh, and feel free to find me on Facebook :-)
Flatline on Facebook
Last edited by Iron Flatline; 11-19-2011 at 09:14 AM.
Reason: I spell like a m00k.
-
11-19-2011 08:19 AM
# ADS
-
Your work has simply become AMAZING!
-
Keeper of the Padlocks
Site Moderator
You site is using music!! (that is apparently a sin but you're forgiven)
Also Bitter summed it up!
-
THANK YOU!!!
Yeah, pretty pleased with where things are going. When I committed two years ago to "retire" from actual work and focus on photography I was worried I might suck. I'm happy to find I don't.
-
<--- New Avatar! New Sig File ---->
-
Keeper of the Padlocks
Site Moderator
I'd move your sig contents to the left - the right side is very easily missed (esp with the red links under the like button already masking them as being just part of the dull forum appearance
).
Also ---- I preferred your old avatar!
-

Originally Posted by
Iron Flatline
THANK YOU!!!
Yeah, pretty pleased with where things are going. When I committed two years ago to "retire" from actual work and focus on photography I was worried I might suck. I'm happy to find I don't.
Don't take this the wrong way, but, I didn't care much for you work when I joined here, and saw it. But man! I really don't have words. I've looked at your site several time since you've been back, and your work is beautiful. It is art. It is fascinating, captivating...how much more can I say, it speaks for itself.
I am not typically fond of artistic nudes, because they typically lack the artistic part. Your work does not.
-

Originally Posted by
Bitter Jeweler
I am not typically fond of artistic nudes, because they typically lack the artistic part.
Really?
Who have you been looking at?
"Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once you grow up."
Pablo Picasso
-
Can't see the books, they keep uploading, and uploading... or is it downloading?
"Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once you grow up."
Pablo Picasso
-
Keeper of the Padlocks
Site Moderator
Yeah I think something is broken on their preview feature - so I cheated and looked at the pics on his site
-
Blurb book preview sucks. A lot. With a vengeance. I'm talking Slovakian border-crossing Ho.
I think 90% of nude shooters do it simply to somehow show that they can get women to get naked. Some actually come out with interesting images, but I try and do a different thing. There seem to be a few schools of nude shooters: Get 'em naked and do a quasi-sexy hyper-saturated magazine pose, there's the beautiful highly-posed B&W Mapplethorpe, the variation between pin-up, tattoos, and fetish, the shoot-'em-ugly Nan Goldin approach, and the boudoir less-is-more. I have very little use of nude photography, because I cannot find a language for myself that I find compelling. There is a new school of extremely intimate self-portraits done by some very powerful and self-confident women whose work I admire. It gets very close, an angle that you really only see while having sex, but it is still a self-portrait... and as such something I could never shoot. For me, I absolutely HAVE to allude to a story, or the image doesn't work... why is she in the room? Is she happy? or sad? Because he's gone? Because he's coming back? That kind of narrative matters to me a lot. But there are definitely some people out there doing original work... it's jus that I am more fascinated by the folds and reflections of certain fabrics than I am by human skin. My next project will be very much about sexuality, but in a confrontative way, I want the viewer to be uncomfortable. Stat tuned
-

Originally Posted by
c.cloudwalker

Originally Posted by
Bitter Jeweler
I am not typically fond of artistic nudes, because they typically lack the artistic part.
Really?
Who have you been looking at?
I am speaking of amateurs/hobbyists, basically, Cloud. Also what I have seen in arenas such as our Photography Club, locally. Nudes win 1st place in competition almost everytime. But I see them more as Iron put it in his post. Yeah I get the whole "form" thing, but I still am not drawn to most of what I see from the area described above. What I feel most of the time from them is "look at me, I shoot nudes, and I'm so artsy". :-p
Iron, thanks for your response.
-
Yep. B&W naked chick with two light sources = art. Shoot me.
-
*pffft* You forgot colored gels, for the sans B&W shots.
-
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
eck!!! Wow man... I am stunned to find you on a forum, honestly you do some superb work. Thank you for sharing.
-TbW