This is a discussion on Photoshop? Lightroom? within the Photo Assignments & Technical Challenges forums, part of the Foundations of Photography category; I have photoshop, I don't have lightroom. Could someone please explain: 1. If you have photoshop, is it worth getting lightroom? 2. What are lightrooms ...
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Blogs | Members List | Social Groups | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Photo Assignments & Technical Challenges If you are looking to sharpen your technical skills, or just enjoy participating in group assignments - this is the place for you! Join other members in themed assignments, or start your own! |
|
|
#1 |
|
TPF Noob!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 21
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
Photoshop? Lightroom?
I have photoshop, I don't have lightroom.
Could someone please explain: 1. If you have photoshop, is it worth getting lightroom? 2. What are lightrooms advantages? 3. What are photoshops advantages? Anything else in helping me decide whether to spring the money ($300) on Lightroom or keep CS4 would be nice. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
![]() ThePhotoForum.com is the premier Photography Forum & Digital Camera Resource! Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
#2 |
|
I gotta make more TPF time!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 926
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 37 Times in 34 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
Get both. Lightroom is a workflow tool. For its organizational, cataloging, keywording, searching, rating, flagging, creating collections, etc..., it is essential. It is the most useful tool that I've ever used. I can also do about 80% of the post-processing that I need to do right there: color temperature, contrast, cropping, rotating, spot healing, color correction, sharpening, etc... I bounce out into Photoshop for when I need to do anything more extensive than that.
If you can only get one, I'd get Lightroom. For the organizational side of things alone, it's the most valuable tool that I have. Plus as I said, it handles the majority of the post-processing that I need to do.
__________________
-Pugs Nikon D300: - Nikkor 18-55mm AF-S f/3.5-5.6 DX GII - ProMaster 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 - Nikkor 50mm AF f/1.8 D - ProMaster 55-200mm AF f/4-5.6 LD Macro - Nikkor 70-300mm AF f/4-5.6 G - Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DL Macro Super Konica Autoreflex T2 & nT3 - Hexanon 50mm AF f/1.7 - Hexanon 52mm AF f/1.8 - Hexanon 100mm AF f/2.8 - Spiratone 135mm Auto Spira-Tel YS f/2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
TPF Noob!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 21
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
ARGH. The thing is that I'm 15 years old and do photo work as a hobby. Do you really feel photoshop won't be good enough? Argh....I'm probably looking for a justification that accentuates that photoshop is of equal or greater purpose but I've been told that Lightroom does almost all necessary editing work of Photoshop but acts as a workhorse in comparison to speed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Been spending a lot of time on here!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: A.C.T Australia
Posts: 228
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
if your only doing photography casually and dont really have to deal with big workloads, then its probably not worth your money if you already have photoshop. lightroom is made specifically for photography, it makes it easier for all your basic post processing - i.e cropping, rotating, adjusting contrast, tint, saturation etc. you can do all these things in photoshop, its just lightroom makes it a much easier and faster process. its pretty much iPhoto on steroids.
you can always head over to Adobe and get the 30 day free trial of it, see if its for you. its definitely a useful tool to have, but not a necessity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,366
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 64 Times in 62 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
PS: is more of an individualized approach to images.
LR: allows you quicker approach to your images to do basic and I guess relatively advanced manipulations. Together the two are a perfect marriage Quote:
where the tutorial on how to use Lightroom?
http://thelightroomlab.com/ http://www.photoshopusertv.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
TPF Noob!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 23
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
If you are a student (which I hope you still are) you can get Lightroom for $99 from places like journeyed.com.
__________________
Mark http://www.sportsshooter.com/mdruziak http://druziak.weebly.com http://mdruziak.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
No longer a newbie, moving up!
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 96
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
LR 3 Beta is available for free download and useable till March... Try it..
Adobe Labs - Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,561
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
My Gallery: (30)
|
Cheap way out
Of course the really cheap way out is to purchase Paintshop Pro Ultimate X 2 at around $50 or less. It is very photoshop-like in all its features and has Express Lab built-in, which works like Lightroom. The plug-ins that many buy separately for Photoshop such as software filters, etc. also work with Paintshop Pro X 2.
skieur |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 1,041
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 38 Times in 36 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
Personally, I use lightroom much more than Photoshop, primarily because of it's ease of use and the fact that it's better for workflow. It also has (once you get used to it) a useful system for organization of photos.
Photoshop does have more abilities though in actual image manipulation. My personal suggestion? get the lightroom Beta, and see if you need anything else. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
TPF Junkie!
|
Guys, he already has Photoshop...
Since you are 15 just stick with that, worry about Lightroom later in life - or download the Beta as mentioned and play with it for a few months to see if you just can't live without it. There's really nothing you couldn't already do for no extra cost, and being 15 years old I'd place a bet that you have more time than money.
__________________
I am the french fry in a box of onion rings. Click to see the world through one crappy lens. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,179
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
GET THEM ALL!!!!!
__________________
Nikon D300s Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikkor 105mm f/1.8 AI-S "It's not about what you see.....it's about how you see it." |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,156
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
Lightroom is hardly essential. Bridge and Camera Raw were sufficing before Adobe decided to put the two into a seperate product. Does LR do it better - of course it does, that's what it is designed to do. However if you only have Photoshop (and by default Bridge/Camera Raw) you still have a pretty nice workflow setup that won't have you ripping your hair out.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Lower Navigation
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |