-
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
DX/EF-S versus Full Frame focal lengths?
I'm just curious.....if there are lenses that ONLY work with crop sensors such as the DX and EF-S lenses and Nikon and Canon had, then why are they still labeled with the full frame focal length? If a lens is 18-55mm, and the crop sensor equivalent is about 28-90mm, then why don't they just label the lens as the actual length that it is on a crop sensor, since that is the only size of sensor that the lens will work with?
Maybe this is a stupid question. :P
Indentured Student (and hating it). Hopeful Amateur (and getting better).
Canon 1D Mark II, Canon 60D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L, Canon EF 100-400mm f/3.5-5.6L, Canon Speedlite 580EX II
http://www.davevaughn.com
Tell me what you think. It would mean a lot. 
-
02-07-2012 06:04 PM
# ADS
-
Focal length is focal length. Physics do not change because of sensor size.
Focal Length of a Lens
Understanding Camera Lenses
I can honestly say that there are two most remarkable men in the world today. Michio Kaku is one, and I am the other. Between us we cover all knowledge.
Kaku knows all that can be known....And I know the rest. 
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery. Today?
Today is a gift. That is why we call it the present."
Master Wugui from Kung Fu Panda
You don't take a photograph, you make it.
Ansel Adams
-
Because focal length does not change. 50mm is 50mm. Period. The effective Field of View from a DX and FX lens does thiough.
The Liver is Evil and Must Be Punished.
Shooter of FX, DX and MFT
I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
-
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Yes, but why don't they just label it as the effective FoV? I guess it's a matter of what a lenses focal length physically is as opposed to the focal length that it truly represents in an image.
I mean, the physics may not change, but the physical image does. It just seems kind of pointless to have crop sensor lenses if in reality they offer the same FoV of the full frame lenses.
Indentured Student (and hating it). Hopeful Amateur (and getting better).
Canon 1D Mark II, Canon 60D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L, Canon EF 100-400mm f/3.5-5.6L, Canon Speedlite 580EX II
http://www.davevaughn.com
Tell me what you think. It would mean a lot. 
-
D700 | Nikon 24-70 | Nikon 70-200 VRII | 50mm f/1.4 | Manfrotto | pocketwizards | flashes
-
I spend too much of my life on TPF!

Originally Posted by
2WheelPhoto
Keep coming back.
What?
Indentured Student (and hating it). Hopeful Amateur (and getting better).
Canon 1D Mark II, Canon 60D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L, Canon EF 100-400mm f/3.5-5.6L, Canon Speedlite 580EX II
http://www.davevaughn.com
Tell me what you think. It would mean a lot. 
-

Originally Posted by
rexbobcat
Yes, but why don't they just label it as the effective FoV?
Because they want to confuse people who go by the username "rexbobcat".... joking...
"equivalent" FOV... then one has to ask equivalent to what? Don't get hung up on it... its just a way to help older 135 film folks to relate to smaller sensors then it just stuck. At least the medium format guys are smart enough to figure it out without having to translate to another format.
besides....
If they did.. then those shooters who have never shot with full frame would ask
"WTF do they put equiv FOV focal length on a lens that only is for crop sensor?"