This is a discussion on Good Editing? within the Photography Beginners' Forum & Photo Gallery forums, part of the Foundations of Photography category; tell me what you think about the before and after of this photo I edited. Let me know if you think it is a good ...
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Blogs | Members List | Social Groups | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Photography Beginners' Forum & Photo Gallery Brand new to photography, or brushing up on some of the basics? Don’t be shy! Talk to other beginners and ask all your basic photographic questions here. Show us some of the photos you have taken so far and get some review - so you can learn where there is room for improvement! |
|
|
#1 |
|
TPF Noob!
|
Good Editing?
tell me what you think about the before and after of this photo I edited. Let me know if you think it is a good edit or not?
Before After
__________________
Cheers! DWHJR There's to much in this world to not see...
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
![]() ThePhotoForum.com is the premier Photography Forum & Digital Camera Resource! Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
#2 |
|
Been spending a lot of time on here!
|
I'd say you did a pretty good job.
At first glance I don't see any odd cloning marks. I would like to see the tiny bit of motion blur gone though. Nice job/shot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
No longer a newbie, moving up!
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eastern Oklahoma
Posts: 73
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
Woah! You got rid of a whole person! That is awesome!
__________________
www.amandarealphotography.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: U.S.
Posts: 662
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
That must've taken you forever to clone a whole person out! Very nice. Love the tone in the photo. Nice effect.
__________________
Flick my pics |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Image Maker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,905
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 214 Times in 205 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
Good clone job, but Uh, it's still crooked. I'd say the b&w conversion lacks contrast in the mid-tones so there is a lot of detail in the dress that gets lost.
Maybe something like this: I tried to make the groom's feet a bit more noticeable too.
__________________
» » » » » » » » » » Price Update 3/14/10: Nikon D60 w/grip « « « « « « « « « « « « « Sale ends 3/21/10 - price updated 3/14/10: Nikon AF-S 70-300 mm VR G » » » Keith. . . .NAPP member - referral link: https://www.photoshopuser.com/signup/?aid=luhgxq&code=friend Last edited by KmH; 07-04-2009 at 07:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
TPF Noob!
|
KmH,
I like the contrast that you have, bringing out the dress a bit more as well as the grooms feet, however the crop you choose i think does not do the picture justice, in my opinion. It makes the picture uneven, half of the picture has a blank wall with the other half the key subject. With my crop it puts them in the center attention with even walls on each side highlighting the entrance. The contrast you did however is very nice.
__________________
Cheers! DWHJR There's to much in this world to not see...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Image Maker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,905
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 214 Times in 205 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
KmH,
I like the contrast that you have, bringing out the dress a bit more as well as the grooms feet, however the crop you choose i think does not do the picture justice, in my opinion. It makes the picture uneven, half of the picture has a blank wall with the other half the key subject. With my crop it puts them in the center attention with even walls on each side highlighting the entrance. The contrast you did however is very nice. You're right the centered composition worked. However, all the expanse of wall doesn't really add to the image. You might consider a square crop.
__________________
» » » » » » » » » » Price Update 3/14/10: Nikon D60 w/grip « « « « « « « « « « « « « Sale ends 3/21/10 - price updated 3/14/10: Nikon AF-S 70-300 mm VR G » » » Keith. . . .NAPP member - referral link: https://www.photoshopuser.com/signup/?aid=luhgxq&code=friend |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Been spending a lot of time on here!
|
Actually this is not accurate, here thumb nail is still there.
![]() Just kidding, great job. I was happy when I learned how to crop a photo.
__________________
Canon XS 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III EF 50 mm f/1.8 II 430 EX Speedlight Manfrotto 3021 Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,879
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 64 Times in 61 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
When I first saw your thread I thought, WOW! Being new to digital I was amazed you could get rid of this woman and make it look so good. "It" being the edit of the woman.
But then I looked at the two pictures and I couldn't help but wonder why. Why spend time making a boring photo? Now, before you get upset, let me finish. 1/ I don't get putting one (or a few) B&W pictures in a mostly color album. Especially one that is not a good B&W. 2/ You didn't even bother to straighten out the horizon. 3/ and that is the most important. To me, by removing this woman, you killed the photo. It took me a while to figure out that both the bride and groom were in the middle and I still have not the slightest idea what is going on. But it doesn't matter. The original shot is just so-so. The edited shot is blah. In my book so-so is better than blah. And then I look at it again. And, guess what? You have a kinda wonderful picture in the original. Well, ok, to my sick, twisted brain But, seriously, I will not be the only one seeing that while there is nothing to see in the edit.Original: You have a bride and groom rushing forward and a pregnant woman holding the door open for them because they are rushing towards pregnancy, the next step. And she is laughing because this photo is mysterious (not clear at all) and because she knows why they are rushing. Alright, I did mention my twisted brain, so take it for what it's worth but I believe that you could have simply straightened out the original shot and be done with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taupo, NZ
Posts: 645
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
Interesting take cloudwalker.
IMHO I'm not a fan of the original pic itself but I think you did an excellent job in the edit - though you *must* straighten that horizon.
__________________
| Canon 40d | Canon 450d |Canon EF 200mm f2.8L | Canon EF-s 17-55 f2.8 IS | Sigma 10-20mm | Canon EF 50mm f1.8 II | | Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro | Canon EF 70-300mm IS USM | Canon 430EX | Canon 430EXII | flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
TPF Noob!
|
Thanks for all of the responses, especially the one that informed I missed the thumbnail! gotta take care of that one
I think if you were to look at the original from a journalistist point of view, there is alot of story behind this, however, I think that the bride and groom would like to have the photo more centered on them and not distracting others. It's hard for someone who was not there to look at the photo and know exactly whats happening. The reason I took this one at that current moment, is because they were walking into the reception and this is the funny moment they wanted to show everyone! They will remember this moment for the rest of there lives and now they have a picture to remind them. Once again thanks for all the responses and I will be sure to put them into the picture! Harvey
__________________
Cheers! DWHJR There's to much in this world to not see...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Lower Navigation
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |