-
Is f2.8 larger or is f/22 larger
My friend and I are having a friendly debate about aperture.
He insists that f/22 is larger than f/2.8 and I disagree, because it's measured as 1/22 and 1/2.8.
1/2.8 is a larger number than 1/22 isn't it?
-
01-14-2010 01:31 PM
# ADS
-
Been spending a lot of time on here!
Canon 7D
Sigma 150-500mm
Canon 10-22mm
Sony Alpha A300
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro
Sony SAL30M28 30mm f/2.8 Macro
-
No longer a newbie, moving up!

Originally Posted by
APPRo
1/2.8 is a larger number than 1/22 isn't it?
Correct.
-
Been spending a lot of time on here!
2.8 is a larger opening than a 22.
Smaller the opening the larger the aperture
-
Been spending a lot of time on here!
-
f/22 is a larger number than f/2.8. F/2.8 is a larger hole than f/22.
-
f/2.8 is a larger number 1/2.8 or a little over a half versus f/22 which is considerable LESS than a half...
f/2.8 is larger aperture opening than f/22.
f/22 is a larger (deeper) depth of field than f/2.8.
-Pugs
Nikon D300:
- Nikkor 18-55mm AF-S f/3.5-5.6 DX GII
- ProMaster 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6
- Nikkor 50mm AF f/1.8 D
- ProMaster 55-200mm AF f/4-5.6 LD Macro
- Nikkor 70-300mm AF f/4-5.6 G
- Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DL Macro Super
Konica Autoreflex T2 & nT3
- Hexanon 50mm AF f/1.7
- Hexanon 52mm AF f/1.8
- Hexanon 100mm AF f/2.8
- Spiratone 135mm Auto Spira-Tel YS f/2.8
-
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
May the light be with you!
fuji s5700
nikon d60
nikkor 18-55mm af-s
nikkor 55-200mm af-s vr
nikkor 50mm af-d.... so what if it doesn't have autofocus?
My flicker
-

Originally Posted by
Pugs
f/2.8 is a larger number 1/2.8 or a little over a half versus f/22 which is considerable LESS than a half...
f/2.8 is larger aperture opening than f/22.
f/22 is a larger (deeper) depth of field than f/2.8.
Thanks Pugs,
That settles that for now
-

Originally Posted by
Pugs
f/2.8 is a larger number 1/2.8 or a little over a half versus f/22 which is considerable LESS than a half...
f/2.8 is larger aperture opening than f/22.
f/22 is a larger (deeper) depth of field than f/2.8.
+1
-
No longer a newbie, moving up!

Originally Posted by
AUS-10
Yepp Ten,
I discovered a simular article yesterday on this very topic, and once I seen it visually, I got it. Visual really helped.
-
No longer a newbie, moving up!
Next question pertaing to open aperture = great landscape and portraits.
Correct
How does shutter speed now play into this.
I beleive a fast shutter speed is for action, and a slow one for night shots, landscapes and portraits
Correct
-
I spend too much of my life on TPF!
-
Been spending a lot of time on here!
That's it???
Come on guys!.. we need a few more of you to repeat the same answer.
I am kind of disappointed with your lack of willingness to help the OP...
Canon T1i 500D with EF-S 18-55mm IS
Canon EF-S 17-85 IS USM
Canon EF 50mm USM f/1.4
Canon Speedlite 430EX
Canon A640 with WCDC58N wide converter
-
Been spending a lot of time on here!

Originally Posted by
Rockford
Next question pertaing to open aperture = great landscape and portraits.
Correct
How does shutter speed now play into this.
I beleive a fast shutter speed is for action, and a slow one for night shots, landscapes and portraits
Correct
more open is going to be good for portraits because it blurs the background...for landscapes you want to have a deeper depth of field so you want a smaller (bigger number) aperture.
as for shutter speed yes for action you need it to be fast. for night shots its going to need to be slow. For landscape I guess it depends...you could go either way...and for portraits, unless you are shooting with a tripod and your subject is going to stay very still...I would not go with a slow shutter speed.
Of course I am pretty much a beginner myself so if anybody wants to correct me go right ahead!
Canon 7D
Sigma 150-500mm
Canon 10-22mm
Sony Alpha A300
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro
Sony SAL30M28 30mm f/2.8 Macro