Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: 50mm lens f/1.8 Bokeh
-
02-09-2008, 04:46 PM #1
50mm lens f/1.8 Bokeh
What you think the 50mm lens bokeh is bad? I hear the bokeh is bad in some light condition. Is true ? Someone has a picture taken with a 50mm lens with bokeh ? Thanks!
-
02-09-2008 04:46 PM # ADS
-
02-09-2008, 04:51 PM #2Damn You! Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- locked in the attic
- Posts
- 8,485
- My Gallery
- (13)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 5 times
no the bokeh isn't bad... its just not quite as good as the 1.4... but both are VERY good.
-
02-09-2008, 04:53 PM #3
thanks! And what mean "its just not quite as good as the 1.4" I see fuzzy disks on f/1.8 ?
-
02-09-2008, 04:57 PM #4Damn You! Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- locked in the attic
- Posts
- 8,485
- My Gallery
- (13)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 5 times
The 1.4 lens is just a bit better built, and has slightly smoother bokeh but is also much more expensive.
Sorry I'm not quite with you with the 'fuzzy disks' thing?
-
02-09-2008, 05:02 PM #5

the left image has fuzzy disks.
BTW, why fuzzy disks appear?
-
02-09-2008, 05:17 PM #6Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Austin, TX
- Posts
- 234
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
It's because the (5 only) aperture blades are not round... http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...ns-Review.aspx
In reality there's not a whole lot of bokeh difference between the 1.4 and 1.8, but the 1.2 there is a big difference.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...ns-Review.aspx
-Roy
-
02-09-2008, 05:24 PM #7
Sorry for question but Which is the solution to avoid fuzzy disks ?
-
02-09-2008, 05:32 PM #8Damn You! Site Moderator
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- locked in the attic
- Posts
- 8,485
- My Gallery
- (13)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 5 times
well the background blurs more depending on things like aperture and distance from the subject. So changing these will give you different results.
-
02-09-2008, 06:42 PM #9TPF Noob!
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Cacak, Serbia
- Posts
- 12
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
number of aperture blades influences only the shape of spot-light sources which are out of focus, not the overall quality of bokeh. Some 8 or 9-blade lens have terrible bokeh, while some 5-blade lens have very beautiful creamy bokeh.
Zeiss is famous for a few lens with outsanding bokeh. One example:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fodder/212873457/sizes/o/
Canon example (70-200/4):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/heather...pool-birdbokeh
50/1.4:
http://www.luminouslens.com/photoblo...p?showimage=26
My example with Canon 28-300L (focus is not on the front leaf due to myself, cause lens is very heavy and I was very tired):

zoliky: Fuzzy disks appear because strong spotlight sources are not enough out of focus, not number of aperture blades. The quality of bokeh depends more on the optics, as you can seen with wide open aperture, since aperture blades have no influence then.
To get nice fuzziness, too strong background spot-light sources should be avoided.
Nice bokeh can be obtained also with close-focus enabled lens if you put magnifying glass in front of them (in my case, 75mm 2x works best), like in these examples I made (you see that strong background spotlight even then is a problem):

Last edited by kobayashi; 02-09-2008 at 06:48 PM.
If pro stands for progress,
what does con stand for?
-
02-10-2008, 03:08 AM #10
I shoot this using my 50mm lens f/1.8, I don't have macro tubes, etc.. and the bokeh is pretty good, in my opinion. The minimum focus distance for me is 0.45m, is not the best for close-up, but is enough for me. Im a student and I don't have more money to buy something better now.

The fuzzy disks not apear. This mean the focus is good ?
zoliky: Fuzzy disks appear because strong spotlight sources are not enough out of focus, not number of aperture blades.
I read the same thing in my book, but what I need to do to achieve this ? I need to set the good aperture?
-
02-10-2008, 03:08 AM #11TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Slapamonkey, New York
- Posts
- 7,958
- My Gallery
- (28)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 5 times
Please forgive my ignorance here but, Are you refering to any particuler make and model 50mm 1.4 and 1.8 or respective apriture 50mm lenses in general?
Can't understand Deviant Art?

Click banner for PL main site click here for my PL Gallery
I shoot Film, Expect Grain and don't bother bringing it up.
-
02-10-2008, 03:20 AM #12
Sorry, I refer to 50mm f/1.8D Nikon F mount lens. I use this lens only
-
02-10-2008, 04:10 AM #13TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Slapamonkey, New York
- Posts
- 7,958
- My Gallery
- (28)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 5 times
I was unaware of that, thank you.
The reason I asked was I currently own three diffrent 50mm lenses on the same mount from the same make:
Canon 50 mm 1.4 SSC
Canon 50 mm 1.8 SC
Canon 50 mm Macro 1:3.5Can't understand Deviant Art?

Click banner for PL main site click here for my PL Gallery
I shoot Film, Expect Grain and don't bother bringing it up.
-
02-10-2008, 04:57 PM #14TPF Noob!
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Cacak, Serbia
- Posts
- 12
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
Fuzzy disks do not appear because there are no spotlight sources that are too strong. In cases like your photo, a green background would look much better, so if not possible, you can put some artificial background, say green paper etc.
No matter how good aperture you have, if you have too strong light in the background it won't help. It might with some filters and/or very expensive lens, but not with that 50/1.8. You can see here that even 85/1.2 (please don't search for it's price!) cannot kill background spotlights:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:J...with_Bokeh.jpgIf pro stands for progress,
what does con stand for?
Similar Threads
-
What lens aperture is ideal for bokeh?
By droidz in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 11-10-2010, 08:05 AM -
FS: 3 - Nikon Lens (12-24mm, 50mm 1.4D AF, 50mm 1.4g)
By jayr83 in forum Buy and SellReplies: 3Last Post: 06-01-2010, 05:43 PM -
Strange bokeh with Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8
By wise in forum Photography Equipment & ProductsReplies: 10Last Post: 12-08-2009, 11:10 AM -
Lens with good bokeh
By ~myStical~ in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 42Last Post: 07-31-2009, 09:46 AM -
Quite chuffed with the bokeh on new lens.
By kundalini in forum Photography Equipment & ProductsReplies: 20Last Post: 01-19-2009, 08:02 PM
Search tags for this page
1.8 bokeh
,50 1.8 enough bokeh
,50mm 1.8 bokeh
,bokeh with 50mm 1.8
,how do i get bokey with my 50mm 1.8
,how to achieve nice bokeh with 50mm lens
,how to get big bokeh with a 50mm lens
,how to get bokeh 50mm 1.8
,how to get bokeh with 50mm 1.8
,how to have bokeh with 50mm lens
,how to use aperture to put something out of foucs
,what does it mean when you have f 1.8
,what does m.m stand for in digital photography
Click on a term to search for related topics.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



