Results 1 to 14 of 14
-
11-22-2009, 05:44 PM #1Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 101
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
Nikon Macro Lens and Portrait Lens?
Which are the best Macro Lens and Portrait lens?
-
11-22-2009 05:44 PM # ADS
-
11-22-2009, 10:14 PM #2TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- NYC
- Posts
- 2,649
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 43 times
BEST: in short - what you can afford and how you use it.
BEST: in long - I have Nikon 28-105mm glass that is over 10yrs old and LOVE IQ of it. It is both macro (50-105) and my portrait lens. Some reviews are horrible on it and others are great. Point is best is subjective to your flavor. (told you it was long)
HOW YOU USE IT: optimum aperture is 2-3 stops down from widest aperture. thus if you get your 2.8 glass and spend $1000+ on it but don't know how to use it correctly, you images will be soft
and full of bokeh 
Hope this slowly begins to make sense.
PM me if you'd like to talk more or have other specific Qs
-
11-23-2009, 06:03 PM #3I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Rochester N.Y
- Posts
- 344
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
I have read positive feedback on the Nikkor 60 2.8 D for both Macro and portraits, it looks like to be my next lens.
-
11-23-2009, 06:13 PM #4TPF Noob!
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- melbourne
- Posts
- 15
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
-
11-23-2009, 06:43 PM #5TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- State of Confusion
- Posts
- 12,653
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1343 times
The Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 is probably one of the best for both worlds in one lens.
not for every type of shot, but that's a very good set of lenses. 35mm for full body shots, 50mm for bust shots and the 85mm for head shots.would a 35mm, 50mm, and 85mm be a good combo for every type of shot except for telephoto?The Liver is Evil and Must Be Punished.
Shooter of FX, DX and MFT
I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity. - Bullet Tooth Tony
-
11-23-2009, 07:47 PM #6TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Denver, CO
- Posts
- 1,377
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 31 times
Yea, it's hard to invest 600 in a pretty good 60mm macro...when you can save 400 more for the 105mm 2.8 VR
-
11-23-2009, 09:40 PM #7TPF Noob!
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- melbourne
- Posts
- 15
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
-
11-23-2009, 09:45 PM #8I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Cypress, CA
- Posts
- 377
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
-
11-24-2009, 04:10 AM #9
I love both the 60mm and 105mm
-
11-24-2009, 04:35 AM #10No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 66
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
-
11-24-2009, 05:16 AM #11
I have a 105mm f/2.8D model macro for about 10 years not. Absolutely top notch lens. Very good portrait lens on a full frame but may be a little long on a crop body (if you have a small area to work in).
The nice thing about the 105 is you dont have to be right on top of the items to get 1:1 ratio. With a shorter 60mm you in a bit closer. And of course the longer 200mm allows you to be a bit farther away. But would be a bit too long for portraits in normal situations.
So the 105mm in Nikon flavor would be a good choice for both if you have the room for the longer length (assuming you have a crop body).If you want to know my equipment, your gonna have to specify which bag of equipment you want to know. Choices are bag #1 thru #6
-
11-24-2009, 04:41 PM #12TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 2,766
- My Gallery
- (15)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 109 times
105mm f2.8 micro on a full sensor body (d700, d3, d3x)
60mm f2.8 micro on a crop sensor body
-
11-24-2009, 04:42 PM #13TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 2,766
- My Gallery
- (15)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 109 times
-
11-24-2009, 05:15 PM #14No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 66
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
Similar Threads
-
Lens Macro Fold Bellows for Nikon D2H, D2x D50 AF Lens
By Link Delight Online Shop in forum Linkdelight Photography AccessoriesReplies: 0Last Post: 11-05-2010, 07:59 PM -
Which macro lens for Nikon D90??
By say_cheeese! in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 05-21-2010, 11:38 PM -
Which lens to suit macro and portrait photography
By pdiddy in forum Photography Equipment & ProductsReplies: 13Last Post: 11-05-2009, 09:59 AM -
good portrait/macro lens
By Ejazzle in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 11Last Post: 06-29-2008, 07:27 PM -
Need advice on choosing a wide lens, normal lens or macro lens.
By bla in forum Photography Equipment & ProductsReplies: 7Last Post: 06-13-2007, 08:20 PM
Search tags for this page
awesome macro photos
,best lens for nikon d90 portraits
,best macro and portrait lens for nikon
,best macro lens for portrait
,best nikon macro lens for d90
,best nikon portrait macro lens
,best portrait and macro lens
,lens 85mm micro nikon portrait
,macro lens for portrait
,nikon best fx portrait lens
,nikon d90 portrait lens micro
,nikon macro
,nikon macro lens
,nikon macro portret lens
,what is the best macro lens for portraits
Click on a term to search for related topics.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

