Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    51
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times

    Edit in RAW format then Convert to Jpeg?

    Hello everyone, will I get better edits if I adjust the photo in RAW format first then convert it to jpeg? Will it make a large enough difference to do this? All I am really doing is posting image to Flickr, not really getting prints.



  2. #2
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    370
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    4 times
    Yes you want to edit the photograph in Photoshop Camera RAW or another program such as Lightroom or a variety of other programs. Once you're done editing then use the software to export a copy of the edited version as a JPG, not necessarily convert the original file. you want to keep the RAW as well as save the edit's settings in a .xml file, which Camera RAW and Lightroom do when you File -> Save while/after editing.

    andrej



    Canon 50D, gripped
    Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
    Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM
    Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
    Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3

    Promaster 7500 EDF



  3. #3
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Cedar Hill, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    641
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    3 times
    Are you already shooting in RAW and want to know if you should do post processing? If you're shooting in RAW, you'll definitely want to pp the pictures. RAW is raw sensor data. It hasn't had white balance applied, sharpening, saturation, etc. You'll need to do it.

    If you're currently shooting in JPG and are asking if you should shoot in RAW, then that depends. If you want a lot of control over your images in post processing, you'll want to shoot in RAW. RAW gives you the most control possible. You can generally get a better picture shooting in RAW than JPG. The algorithms photo editing software employs is much more than your camera can do.

    If you only want to do minimal post processing, then JPG's fine.
    My Cameras
    Canon 450D ("Slightly Less-Old-Ass Digital Rebel") 12MP
    Canon 300D ("Old-Ass Digital Rebel") 6.2MP

    EF Lenses
    Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Kit
    Sigma 75-300mm f/4-5.6
    Converted 800mm f/4.5L (FD to EF)


    Manual M42 Lenses
    Mamiya/Sekor 50mm f/2 Prime
    Petri 55mm f/1.8 Prime (rough shape)
    Suntar 135mm f/2.8 Prime
    Vivtar 35-70mm f/2.8
    Hanimex 750mm f/9 Mirror (With cool double image! :P)

  4. #4
    I am Big, I am Mike Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    33,490
    My Gallery
    (111)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1679 times

  5. #5
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    260
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    5 times
    Definately do as the others above said. I usually go from a RAW file to a TIF file, then do some more editing and crops on that. Mainly because I hope to print some of these files. If it's for the internet I save it as a jpeg from there and resize it for the web.
    ---------------------------------------------
    Fuji X-Pro1, XF 14mm f2.8R, Voigtlander 21 f4 Color Skopar, XF 35mm f1.4R, XF 60mm f2.4R, Raynox DCR-250
    ---------------------------------------------

  6. #6
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mojave Desert
    Posts
    614
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    3 times
    This question is always one that recurs as new (and old) photographers explore the art more fully..

    ............ The real answer is "It all depends"

    Many professionals shoot in jpeg.. They download their already finished image and ship it off.. no more processing necessary.

    The thing to remember is that jpeg is a "lossy" format, and so if you process it over and over, and even that jpeg image out of the camera; you lose some data each time you save that re-edited image. Eventually you don't have much data left.. That may not be a bad thing if you don't ever edit more than once. Your jpeg will pretty much stay the way it is as long as you want.

    So, to answer your question just as you asked it:

    No, you might not get "better" edits processing in RAW first, then converting to jpeg. But what you will get is the ability to process it some; save it and look it over or have lunch, come back, reprocess it a bit more; or even go back to it next year when you get new software or want to run it through a de-noise program.. or simply reset your RAW data back to square one.


    Personally, I don't usually do any processing to a jpeg file (I do save a number of finished files in TIFF though, especially if a lot of time went into the processing). Jpeg is a final conversion for the web or perhaps a disc for a friend or relative (or customer), and once it's uploaded, it gets deleted - I can always make another from the RAW image, or simply convert the finished TIFF if I ever need one..
    ...Chill, it's just a photograph ......

    Some Photos
    http://500px.com/LarryD

  7. #7
    vtf
    vtf is offline
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    kansas city
    Posts
    2,122
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    242 times
    As far as better depends on your eye and ability to process the image. For some people its easier to take the picture and let the camera do the post processing. Others have the eye. Just posting to flicker for friends I would just shoot jpeg myself.
    Vince
    my flickr
    I shoot in the RAW so I PP on everything
    Canon 70D and 350 xt
    | Both Battery Gripped |Yongnuo 565ex Flash | 15-85mm | 70-200L f4 | 50mm f1.8 | 75-300mm | Driftwood Canvas Backpack
    |Shootin' from the hip!

  8. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Durham, UK
    Posts
    1,918
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1 times
    ^^^Me too, for proofs or upload just jpeg sooc crops, raws get work for printing or effect not to give me extra pp time, I can live without sitting in front of this box all day long. H

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. HOW to convert from RAW to Jpeg?
    By westerngirl14 in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-28-2011, 02:59 PM
  2. Lightroom question: When to convert to JPEG?
    By Jon_Are in forum Graphics Programs and Photo Gallery
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-23-2009, 05:00 PM
  3. RAW convert to JPEG? Files?
    By jeljohns in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-01-2009, 09:04 PM
  4. Can PS Elements 6 Convert Raw to Jpeg?
    By tjdphotos in forum Digital Discussion & Q&A
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-10-2009, 05:50 PM
  5. How to save convert RAW to jpeg?
    By Deadeye008 in forum Graphics Programs and Photo Gallery
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-25-2007, 10:05 AM

Search tags for this page

after shooting in raw should you edit first or change to jpeg frst
,

cs6 how to reset to original after raw edit

,
do you convert raw files to jpg before changing to black and white
,

is it better edit in raw or after convert to jpeg

,

is it better to edit raw or jpeg

,
is it ok to convert raw to jpeg before editing
,

should you convert raw.to jpeg to print

,

what do you save your raw image as after you edit

Click on a term to search for related topics.