Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    In the country just north of Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    4,562
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    749 times

    Do any of these work for you?

    When I am walking about I often see something I think would make a nice picture but when viewed on the computer it goes in the trash. Here are samples of what I am talking about - I just about trashed them but decided to seek the opinion of others.

    Do any work for you?


    1.





    2.





    3.





    4.

    Ron

    Olympus OM-D E-M5, E-PM1, Oly 14-42 II (2), 40-150, 75-300 II, 17/2.8, 45/1.8, Sigma 19/2.8, 30/2.8 & 60/2.8, Bower 7.5/3.5 fish-eye.
    Panasonic G1 & GF1 with 14-45, 45-200 & 14/2.5 and numerous legacy lenses.
    Canon S5 IS and A570 IS



  2. #2
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    14
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    2 times
    1&2 definitely no. They're busy and nothing really eye catching.
    3? maybe?
    4, eh, not so much but not as bad as 1&2.

    I'm with you :P I do alot of hiking with my camera and sometimes I get home and wonder what in the heck I was thinking taking 10 pictures at different angles of a dead leaf or a dead berry, lol. But then sometimes I get home and I have something really cool. I just keep clicking, it's part of the fun of hiking

  3. #3
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati OH
    Posts
    1,329
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    235 times
    They are all really busy (hard to tell the subject).

    The last one the subject is clear but not very interesting.

    Just my .02 cents and not very informed opinion.




    EDIT: the last two the subject is clear.

  4. #4
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    12,793
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    4797 times
    Part of the problem is you are showing us (or a majority of us) things we have seen, numerous times. There is nothing really interesting about the subject, or the way it is presented. That, I feel, is one reason nature shots are soooooooooo difficult to create interesting images.

  5. #5
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    17
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    My opinion:

    The first two are too busy, with no clear subject.

    3 & 4 are better in that regard, but the lighting is harsh, and there's not much that's particularly interesting going on.

    The third one is actually the best IMO, in terms of framing, subject focus, but the subject is just too boring.

  6. #6
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    756
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    24 times
    None of them work for me. Off the bat..a couple of theories why..None of them contain two or more primaries. We have the yellow leaf and some secondary colors. The shots are all ambiguous - in that they place similar tones next to eachother. There's little contrast - or counterpoint. In terms of composition, any sweet spots in terms or DM or thirds are negated by discordant interactions elsewhere. Sometimes a 1:1 can set the absolute character of what's within (the square has a special power I think to do this). There's to much lacking in these to achieve some satisfying/engaging result.

  7. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    In the country just north of Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    4,562
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    749 times
    Thanks for your comments folks, it seems you have confirmed my opinion of the shots. I will continue to try but maybe it is as Bitter said, that my subject matter is too familiar. However, I believe most folk do not "see" the details in nature I seem unable to capture properly.
    Ron

    Olympus OM-D E-M5, E-PM1, Oly 14-42 II (2), 40-150, 75-300 II, 17/2.8, 45/1.8, Sigma 19/2.8, 30/2.8 & 60/2.8, Bower 7.5/3.5 fish-eye.
    Panasonic G1 & GF1 with 14-45, 45-200 & 14/2.5 and numerous legacy lenses.
    Canon S5 IS and A570 IS

  8. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    12,793
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    4797 times
    I think you captured the details just fine.

  9. #9
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati OH
    Posts
    1,329
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    235 times
    Here's a few of mine:







    I feel kind of the same way you do. It's hard to make a truly compelling nature shot.

    Sorry if I'm hijacking your thread. Just figured it was appropriate place to show these.

  10. #10
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    phoenix
    Posts
    173
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    9 times
    ya i agree, nothing really stands out at first. although, and i run into the same thing. ive been trying to get more and more up close when i find myself in these environments. because as the detail clearly stands out the closer you get to things, the character of it becomes more visible.
    "You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. It's the crazy idea you're laughin' at him..."

    5d / 24-105mm F4L / 420 EX / Cheap Promaster Trigger / Bourbon

  11. #11
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati OH
    Posts
    1,329
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    235 times
    Of the three I posted I like the tree bark one the most.

    Coincidentally I'm closest to that one.

  12. #12
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    756
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    24 times
    These have more going for them in terms of color. 1 and 3 use two primaries (number one just about, if the terracotta/brown is treated as towards red.. or can be enhanced to be). The second picture has near-black (silhouetted against the sky) and combined with white (giving color harmony), plus one spot color (which is also a primary). For me, at a glance, there looks potentially DM/ROT compositional relationships in 1 & 2, as well. Not much stands in the way of 1 & 2 making a good image but 3 has a much to negate it, as to attract.

    Quote Originally Posted by JAC526 View Post
    Here's a few of mine:







    I feel kind of the same way you do. It's hard to make a truly compelling nature shot.

    Sorry if I'm hijacking your thread. Just figured it was appropriate place to show these.

  13. #13
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati OH
    Posts
    1,329
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    235 times
    Thanks for the critique.

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Some of my work!
    By ukko in forum General Gallery
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 03:10 AM
  2. a few from work and a cat.
    By fwellers in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-05-2009, 12:41 PM
  3. SUBMITTING WORK/getting work
    By Luke in forum General Shop Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-12-2006, 10:27 PM
  4. art work and a piece of work
    By JonMikal in forum General Gallery
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-30-2005, 10:14 AM

Search tags for this page

any of these dates work
,
any of these work for you
,
are there any dates or times that work well
,
do any of these dates
,

do any of these times work for you

,
do these days work for you/
,
does any of these days work for you
,
these dates/time works for you
,
will these work for you
,
would any of these dates work for you
Click on a term to search for related topics.