Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Western MA, USA
    Posts
    369
    My Gallery
    (48)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    26 times

    Finally posting a few pics for C&C

    Go easy on the tech speak, I'm still learning it all.

    1.

    2.




    3.

  2. # ADS
    Ads
    Google Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

  3. #2
    Watch the Birdy! Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Southern Vancouver Island, BC
    Posts
    17,125
    My Gallery
    (25)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2618 times
    C&C per req:

    1. While I'm not a fan of the currently popular desaturated look, it is a personal thing. In this case however, the cast is leaning toward the green/brown and not, IMO the most appropriate for a bride. I would level the image and crop one side or the other to move the subjects slightly off-centre. On the plus side, you've got good exposure on the whites, always the most important thing in wedding photography.

    2. A nice image, and good exposure, but it does look a little 'flashed' to me, that is, there appears to be a bit of glare from your flash.

    3. There was potential here, but I think you may have missed it. The background is very busy and distracting, with bright and dark areas which pull the eye from the subject, and an overly tight crop. The face is under-exposed and really needed a fill light image right. Try and avoid cropping limbs, especially little bits of them such as the child's hand/fingers. If you need to crop limbs, do it boldly and not at/near joints.

    Overall, they're not bad at all. The processing is a personal thing. One note, the use of the word 'copyright' in your watermark is redundant when you have the copyright symbol.

    Just my $00.02 worth - your mileage may vary.

    ~John

  4. #3
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    3,876
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    429 times
    not a fan of YOUR use of desaturation. why is the third pic in this group. Seems completely unrelated.
    Sony A580 and Sony A200 DSLR + grip
    Sigma 10-20 f3.5; Sigma 17-50mm f2.8; Sigma: 70-210mmF2.8 APO;
    Minolta 50mm F1.7
    Sony HVL-42AM Flash

    My Flickr

  5. #4
    KmH
    KmH is offline
    Helping photographers learn to fish
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    28,748
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2799 times
    Quote Originally Posted by tirediron View Post
    One note, the use of the word 'copyright' in your watermark is redundant when you have the copyright symbol.
    The US Copyright Office has guidelines for copyright notice: http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ03.pdf

  6. #5
    Watch the Birdy! Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Southern Vancouver Island, BC
    Posts
    17,125
    My Gallery
    (25)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2618 times
    Quote Originally Posted by KmH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by tirediron View Post
    One note, the use of the word 'copyright' in your watermark is redundant when you have the copyright symbol.
    The US Copyright Office has guidelines for copyright notice: http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ03.pdf
    Keith, do you get a commission from the Copyright Office for every one of their links you post???

  7. #6
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Western MA, USA
    Posts
    369
    My Gallery
    (48)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    26 times
    Quote Originally Posted by tirediron View Post
    C&C per req:

    1. While I'm not a fan of the currently popular desaturated look, it is a personal thing. In this case however, the cast is leaning toward the green/brown and not, IMO the most appropriate for a bride. I would level the image and crop one side or the other to move the subjects slightly off-centre. On the plus side, you've got good exposure on the whites, always the most important thing in wedding photography.

    2. A nice image, and good exposure, but it does look a little 'flashed' to me, that is, there appears to be a bit of glare from your flash.

    3. There was potential here, but I think you may have missed it. The background is very busy and distracting, with bright and dark areas which pull the eye from the subject, and an overly tight crop. The face is under-exposed and really needed a fill light image right. Try and avoid cropping limbs, especially little bits of them such as the child's hand/fingers. If you need to crop limbs, do it boldly and not at/near joints.

    Overall, they're not bad at all. The processing is a personal thing. One note, the use of the word 'copyright' in your watermark is redundant when you have the copyright symbol.

    Just my $00.02 worth - your mileage may vary.

    ~John
    Thank you John. I do have a habit of using desaturization a bit too much. But I always provide both versions when I show them and then they can choose what they like better. I'm not sure I'd agree with the off-center part though. I think it works in the second one, but not sure about the first.

    The second one was a bit of a crazy place to shoot. The back porch of a country club, and not a big porch at that. Not a lot of options for lighting and it was getting dark fast. I have a flash mounted on the side of my camera, maybe if I used my diffuser? This was only my second wedding on my own, so still a lot to learn.

    The last one was a case of having the wrong lens on the camera in a tight place. I thought I would give it a try, but you're right, just too tight of a shot. I was playing more with the DOF and changing up the aperture.

    As to Diskojoe, these were just three pics I thought I would put up for C&C, not really in a theme. As for the saturation, I guess I prefer to half the saturation then to go totally B&W... Just a preference. What don't you like about it? They seemed like moments that needed a little softening. What are other options?

  8. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Beautiful Hills of East Tennessee
    Posts
    3,681
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    1568 times
    I agree that the first picture should be slightly off-center; or perhaps cropped to a portrait orientation instead.
    I'd really like to see the original of the first two, to compare them to the desaturated versions.

  9. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Vermont, US
    Posts
    3,009
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    522 times
    Quote Originally Posted by momo3boys

    As to Diskojoe, these were just three pics I thought I would put up for C&C, not really in a theme. As for the saturation, I guess I prefer to half the saturation then to go totally B&W... Just a preference. What don't you like about it? They seemed like moments that needed a little softening. What are other options?
    I don't know if I think the desaturation softens the image in this case. I agree that it would be nice to see the color images.

    I just think that if I was the bride I wouldn't like the desaturated look. It makes the skintones almost grayish IMO. Its suppose to be one of the happiest days of the brides life but the coloring looks a little dreary! I'm sure there is another way to soften the picture. I know you said you didn't want to go fully black and white but I think it would look better! You can do softer looking black and whites.
    Megan

  10. #9
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Western MA, USA
    Posts
    369
    My Gallery
    (48)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    26 times
    Ok, here are the originals of the weddings pics. What do you think?
    1.


    2.


  11. #10
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    518
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    37 times
    You have good background blur in the first but it does have some flash harshnesss which could porbably be reduced in post processing. For the second one I would have shot or cropped it to portrait orientation plus the horizon line running across the frame right at the top of her head is a problem.
    You can call me Jim.

    Nikon D7000 : 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR DX : 50mm f/1.8D : 300mm f/4 AF-S w/Kenko 1.4 Teleplus Pro 300 DGX : Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro : Meike battery grip (to be replaced with Nikon) w/ second EN-EL15
    ---
    Nikon D50 backup body : 28-80mm kit lens

  12. #11
    Watch the Birdy! Site Moderator
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Southern Vancouver Island, BC
    Posts
    17,125
    My Gallery
    (25)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2618 times
    MUCH prefer the colour versions.

  13. #12
    KmH
    KmH is offline
    Helping photographers learn to fish
    TPF Supporter

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    28,748
    My Gallery
    (1)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    2799 times
    Quote Originally Posted by tirediron View Post
    Keith, do you get a commission from the Copyright Office for every one of their links you post???
    I wish! Them and Cambridge In Colour's web site.

  14. #13
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Western MA, USA
    Posts
    369
    My Gallery
    (48)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    26 times
    Thanks guys. Time to swallow my pride and stop desaturating pictures.. at least until the novelty wears off I appreciate all the input.

  15. #14
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Vermont, US
    Posts
    3,009
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    522 times
    I love the colored ones!
    Megan

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Finally posting some pics for CC
    By ToMaNyToYsJf in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-04-2011, 02:46 PM
  2. Lurker Finally Posting
    By beautiful*disaster in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-03-2010, 08:56 AM
  3. Finally a shot worth posting!! C&C welcome
    By bazpaul in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 05:22 AM
  4. PICS PICS PICS FINALLY!!! Yeah!
    By bethany138 in forum Landscape & Cityscape
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-22-2005, 10:25 AM
  5. posting pics
    By luckydog in forum Feedback and Suggestions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-20-2005, 04:06 AM