This is a discussion on DIY film scanning with flash + macro lens. within the Photography Equipment & Products: News & Reviews forums, part of the Foundations of Photography category; We are attempting to digitise our film collection at home, however our scanner a cheaper Canon flatbed scanner takes about 2min per frame. Now working ...
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Members List | Social Groups | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Photography Equipment & Products: News & Reviews Talk about the latest photographic headlines and read - or give - product reviews. Also get advice on what equipment to purchase and get opinions from others about various products. |
|
|
#1 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 7,928
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 118 Times in 108 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
DIY film scanning with flash + macro lens.
We are attempting to digitise our film collection at home, however our scanner a cheaper Canon flatbed scanner takes about 2min per frame. Now working on the principle that the if you backlight a film frame and then take a 1:1 (or 1:1.5 in case of an APS camera) macro photo of the frame produces an instant print I set about building a rig to scan film quickly.
Ok so it's very basic and currently still in it's first stages to check if the idea would even work. There are obvious problems like can the 12bit RAW file of the camera (which is converted to a gamma of 2.2, 16bit file) compete with an image inverted by the scanner driver (true 16bit gamma 1.0 processed file saved with a gamma of 2.2). So easy enough I set about to do a quick test. First the rig: ![]() This is currently incomplete but the idea is that the frame is held on the sides and flattened by pieces of plastic covered in felt. This doesn't appear to scratch the negative when it is loaded or unloaded. At the bottom is the flash unit, and half way up is a sheet of paper to act as a diffuser. The top plate has a hole in it and while it currently isn't used the distance from the back edge to where the film is held is the same distance as from the tripod socket of the D200 to the centre of the sensor. This is for future things to hold the camera so I don't even need a tripod. And the results: On the left (or maybe top) a scan from the Canon flatbed with film holder and backlight (2min scan time not including the loading of the film). On the right (bottom), the photo from my rig, processed by batch in photoshop. (30 seconds including loading film and focusing camera which would not normally be done for subsequent frames). ![]() Overall I am very happy so far but a bit of fine tuning is needed. The film colour conversion came out well with the photoshop plugin ColourNeg actually doing a better job of colour inversion than the scanner despite the scanner having the extra bits to play with. I also haven't figured out what colour temperature or how to create a gamma 1 curve in CameraRAW so I can get a decent negative to work with from the RAW file. The other obvious problem is the brightness inconsistency. This can be fixed by getting a better diffuser, moving the diffuser further away, or easier still shooting at a lower aperture. However the lower aperture idea will have to wait for a more stable focusing / holding system since the tripod standing on carpet lead to quite a few blurry (but consistently lit) shots the first time I tried this at f/4. Stay tuned |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
![]() ThePhotoForum.com is the premier Photography Forum & Digital Camera Resource! Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
#2 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Upper West Side of Mississippi (you have no idea just how funny that is)
Posts: 3,514
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 27 Times in 26 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
So the enlarger thing didn't work, eh?
__________________
Regret: A sin best left to others. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
TPF Junkie!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 7,928
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 118 Times in 108 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
|
Sorry Mike I haven't had access to the enlarger yet. My friend who has it is working stupid hours at the moment. Although when I think about scanning the entire surface of the scanner at 4800ppi you end up with 16GB TIFF file I think, so that's the exact opposite of what I am trying to achieve here.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Lower Navigation
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Visitors found this page by searching for: |
diy film scanner,scan film diy,flatbed scanner with a backlight unit,lens scan,DIY film scanning,diy film scan,scanner film diy,flatbed scanners with a backlight unit,backlight unit scanner,diy digitize a negative,diy photo scanner,flatbed scanner with a backlight unit.,flatbed scanner backlight,scan film macro digital camera diy,film scanner macro,film scanner backlight,diy negative film scanner,diy negative scanner,scan film macro lens,diy macro lens,do-it-yourself film scanner,macro pictures of negative instead of scanning,film negative lens scanner,diy film photograhing,photo scanner backlight |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |