Canon 24-105L v prime lenses

This is a discussion on Canon 24-105L v prime lenses within the Photography Equipment & Products: News & Reviews forums, part of the Foundations of Photography category; Just about everything I need to do in 35mm can be achieved within a relatively short focal range and for years I worked exclusively with ...


Go Back   The Photo Forum - Photography Discussion Forum > Foundations of Photography > Photography Equipment & Products: News & Reviews


Photography Equipment & Products: News & Reviews Talk about the latest photographic headlines and read - or give - product reviews. Also get advice on what equipment to purchase and get opinions from others about various products.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2009, 12:03 PM   #1
No longer a newbie, moving up!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 28
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
Canon 24-105L v prime lenses

Just about everything I need to do in 35mm can be achieved within a relatively short focal range and for years I worked exclusively with my prime lenses from the 28mm F2.8 to the 100mm Macro. More recently I purchased a 24-105L and have been generally impressed by the performance, so I decided to test it side by side against the primes to see how they compare.

The first two parts with the 28mm F2.8 and the 35mm F2.0 can be seen at the following urls below and I shall add some more when the other lens tests have been prepared. Any thoughts or comments are welcome.

N.B This is not a highly technical test so simply treat it as my findings on that particular day, however, it does seem to mirror what I have experienced in day to day use with these lenses as a working photographer.

Canon 24-105L v Prime lenses test review shootout at 28mm | Nude Photo Pro

Canon 24-105L v prime lenses test review shootout at 35mm | Nude Photo Pro
ashleykaryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

ThePhotoForum.com is the premier Photography Forum & Digital Camera Resource! Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Old 11-25-2009, 12:36 PM   #2
Been spending a lot of time on here!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 226
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
Quote:
I really don’t buy the argument that if a lens isn’t an L series it is automatically not worthwhile considering, since many non Canon lenses such as the 85mm F1.8 are of proven high quality and don’t need a letter L to justify their place in any photographer’s camera bag.
True, not necessarily. The 85mm f/1.8 is DEFINITELY worth considering.

However, "user reviews" of the 28mm f/2.8 and the 35mm f/2.0 are "mixed," to say the least.
MrLogic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 12:41 PM   #3
Sharkbait!!!! hoo ha ha
 
usayit's Avatar
TPF Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North New Jersey, United States of America
Posts: 6,154
My Photos Are OK to Edit
Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
The L designation just makes it easier to separate the upper and lower line of Canon lenses... more to do with marketing than anything else. You are absolutely right that there are non-L lenses that are definitely worth considering... I"d even go as far as say that there are non-Canon lenses also worth considering.

Zooms have come a long way since the 80s but I still don't think they compare to even some inexpensive primes.

My fav's in the Canon line: 24mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 135mm f/2L and 300mm f/4L. The 135mmL simply always amazes me... I was sad to see it get sold.
__________________
Woohooo!!! <exits stage left>

My equipment: Right Eye and Left Eye.
usayit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 12:53 PM   #4
No longer a newbie, moving up!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 28
My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Gallery: (0)
I love my 85mm and I know the 135mm L is supposed to be an outstanding lens, but I've never really liked it as a focal length in much the same way as I prefer 24mm to 28mm. On the Hasselblad I've always favoured the 180mm over the 150mm. I guess it's all just subjective.
ashleykaryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   The Photo Forum - Photography Discussion Forum > Foundations of Photography > Photography Equipment & Products: News & Reviews

Tags
24-105l, 28mm, 35mm, canon, zoom


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Celebrity Gossip - United States Message Board - Parrot Forum - Honda Motorcycle - iPhone Forum - Motorola Droid Forum - Nintendo Wii Forum - Apple iPad Forum