Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    50
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times

    70-200 nikkor Vs sigma Vs tamron

    Nikkor AF-S VR 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED
    Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro
    Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM

    these 3 lenses are for my d40. I don't know the performance of these three lenses. i would like to know your opinion on their performance with regards to their prices.



  2. #2
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Eddington, ME
    Posts
    2,101
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    15 times
    Nikon absolutely if you have the funding. Sigma I have had so so experiences with them (not the 70-200 lens though). Have never tried a Tamron. All of my Nikon lenses are of the f/2.8 variety. When I decided to get back into photography after about 5 years of being without a camera. I decided to get the good stuff right off the bat. After nearly 10 years now I have never regretted that.

    Almost any reviews you read of the lenses in question they always compare back to the Nikon. Thats good enough for me. I have a Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 for my Canon 20D. Only issue is sometimes the camera will lock with error code from the lens. This is well known issue, and not sure if its Sigma (most likely) or Canon issue. Does not happen that often. But has occured more than a couple times. I have never really looked into it online. I just reset everything and keep going.
    If you want to know my equipment, your gonna have to specify which bag of equipment you want to know. Choices are bag #1 thru #6

  3. #3
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    36
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    im in the same boat, and i will likely go with the sigma.
    it seems to have a decent reputation, and a price i can live with.

  4. #4
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    50
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    in their websites, nikkor cost around $1.6k, sigma $1.3k and tamron $1.2k. i quess the $300 difference between nikkor and sigma is worthy. however in SG$ the difference is around $500 which is not a small mount too.

  5. #5
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    13,248
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    1704 times
    Nikkor

    Sigma

    Tamron(photozone hasn't reviewed this lens, thus dpreview link)


    Hands down, the Nikkor is the gold standard in this class.
    The Liver is Evil and Must Be Punished.
    Shooter of FX, DX and MFT

  6. #6
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Jupiter/ Tequesta FL
    Posts
    651
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    okay, before you consider the sigma.

    read a lot of these reviews

    http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/s...&cat=37&page=3

  7. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Montreal, QC, Canada
    Posts
    6,082
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    5 times
    Tamron was never a real contender in this class, Sigma was not much better and had QC issues like no one else on top of it, and the Nikkor 70-200 has been around for what, over 10 years or more unchanged and undefeated in all that time. Bottom line is that the Nikkor doesn't have any real competition... it *is* the competition... lol

    I bought this lens, and have never looked back. It is worth every penny. The only thing I will say is that on a full frame camera like my D700, it vignettes, but that is EASY to change within 5 seconds in post. It does not vignette at all on a cropped sensor camera.



  8. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,312
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    1 times
    Quote Originally Posted by JerryPH View Post
    Tamron was never a real contender in this class, Sigma was not much better and had QC issues like no one else on top of it, and the Nikkor 70-200 has been around for what, over 10 years or more unchanged and undefeated in all that time. Bottom line is that the Nikkor doesn't have any real competition... it *is* the competition... lol

    I bought this lens, and have never looked back. It is worth every penny. The only thing I will say is that on a full frame camera like my D700, it vignettes, but that is EASY to change within 5 seconds in post. It does not vignette at all on a cropped sensor camera.

    The new Tamron outperforms the Sigma on image quality, but the Sigma has a faster focus motor. This is the rumblings I've heard from a recent popular photography review regarding this lens class.

    The Nikkor 70-200vr has been out since 2003. It has no real rival in the Nikon world.
    I'm the reason you can't trust what you read on the Internet

    D300 . Nikkor 24-70 2.8 . Nikkor 70-200vr 2.8 . Nikkor50 1.8 . Sigma105 2.8 . Tokina12-24 4

  9. #9
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    447
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    Then if you want to save the money and have a body that can focus fast there is the Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 which is what im looking at saving for since i wont spend 1.6k on the VR since i can use a monopod. But the 80-200 AF 2.8 can be had for $890 at adorama brand new. Very sorry i did not notice that the lens would be for the D40 which would not be able to AF the 80-200. There is still the 80-200 2.8 AFS though which has seen been discountued but i think i can be found for about 1k
    Nikon D70
    Nikon AF-S 18-70 f/3.5-4.5
    Nikon AF-D 50 f/1.8
    Nikon SB-600

    Flickr

  10. #10
    TPF Noob!
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Asheville & Elon, NC
    Posts
    14
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    Like everyone else has said, if you have the $$$$ get the Nikkor. Its a staple in the bag of every pro. I want the Nikkor bad, and hope to get it soon.
    Andrew Dodd
    -------------
    Nikon D300 --- Nikon D40x ---Nikon MB-D10 --- Nikon 18-200mm VR --- Nikon 70-300mm VR --- Nikon 50mm f/1.4D --- Sigma 10-20mm --- Nikon 55-200mm VR ---Nikon 18-55mm --- Alienbees Lighting (B800 & Softbox) --- Manfrotto Carbon MF4 --- Manfrotto 680B Monopod --- Really Right Stuff BH-40 LR --- RRS L Clip --- Bogen Magic Arm and 70 lb suction cup --- Gary Fong Lightsphere II --- SB-600 Speedlight ---

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Sigma? Tamron? Nikkor? oh my??
    By ababysean in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-19-2010, 05:24 PM
  2. Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6 vs. Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 vs. Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6
    By NJKILLSYOU in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-30-2010, 05:04 PM
  3. Tamron AF 28-80mm, or Nikkor 50mm F/1.8?
    By anubis404 in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-29-2008, 08:28 PM
  4. 18-250 Tamron instead of 18-200VR Nikkor?
    By itoncool in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-01-2007, 08:28 PM
  5. Tamron vs. Nikkor
    By JenPena in forum Beyond the Basics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-22-2006, 09:18 PM

Search tags for this page

nikon 70-200 vs tamron 70-200
,
nikor tamron 70 200 vs sigma 70 200
,
sigma 70-200 vs tamron 70-200
,
sigma vs tamron 70 200
,
tamron 70 200 vs sigma 70 200
,
tamron 70-200 f2.8 vs nikon 70-200
,
tamron 70-200 vc vs nikon 70-200 vr
,

tamron 70-200 vs nikon 70-200

,
tamron 70-200 vs sigma 70-200
,
tamron vs nikon 70-200
Click on a term to search for related topics.