Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. 06-22-2010, 11:54 AM #1
    gl600 [OP]
    gl600 is offline
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    gl600's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Middle East and Canada
    Posts
    156
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times

    Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM VS Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM??

    Hey,
    Does anyone have experience with both of these lenses?
    I have the 18-50 but I require a bit more reach which is the main reason why I would want the 17-70.
    I understand the obvious differences b/w the 2 lenses (18-50 is a 2.8 throughout the range while the 17-70 isn't, and the 17-70 is an extra 20mm)
    What I want to know is: is there any other significant quality difference between theses lenses, or a difference in performance, that would keep me from selling the 18-50 and buying the 17-70?

    Thanks in advance
    www.flickr.com/photos/artisticisms
    Nikon (and Sigma) Stuff
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-22-2010 11:54 AM # ADS
    Ads
    Google Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
  3. 06-22-2010, 12:00 PM #2
    D-B-J
    D-B-J is offline
    TPF Junkie!
    D-B-J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,228
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    91 times
    geta 1.4 teleconverter. Bam, now you have a 25.2-70mm lens.
    "You miss 100 percent of the shots you never take."

    Follow me on tumblr: http://shallowphoto.tumblr.com/


    Nikon D7000 Gripped~Nikon 80-200 AF-D 2.8D~Nikon 105mm 2.8D~Nikon 50mm 1.8D~Nikon SB600x2~Nikon Su800~15" Macbook Pro~Domke F2 Bag~Pelican 1560
    Creativity & Ingenuity
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-22-2010, 12:01 PM #3
    D-B-J
    D-B-J is offline
    TPF Junkie!
    D-B-J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,228
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    91 times
    with an effective aperture of four throughout the entire range.
    "You miss 100 percent of the shots you never take."

    Follow me on tumblr: http://shallowphoto.tumblr.com/


    Nikon D7000 Gripped~Nikon 80-200 AF-D 2.8D~Nikon 105mm 2.8D~Nikon 50mm 1.8D~Nikon SB600x2~Nikon Su800~15" Macbook Pro~Domke F2 Bag~Pelican 1560
    Creativity & Ingenuity
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-22-2010, 12:10 PM #4
    desertdave
    desertdave is offline
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    desertdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    florida. USA/iraq
    Posts
    133
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    1 times
    I have the 17-70 as my walk-around lens and love it. The only hassle is the filters can be pricey (72mm) My polarizer was over a hundred buckaroonies. It is a very versatile lens and not to pricey.
    David Warner,

    Nikon d90, battery pack, sigma optics, lots and lots of goodies to accompany it
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-22-2010, 01:30 PM #5
    Nod
    Nod is offline
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Nod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    295
    My Gallery
    (44)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    10 times
    I just bought the 17-70 and it will be my walk around lens for sure. I cannot beleive how sharp it is. Yes the filters are pricey, just paid $86 for a polarizer today. Here the 1st picture I took with it just last Friday. No editing (except for sizing) right out of the camrea. You won't be disappointed with this lens.
    Photos @ www.s1267.photobucket.com/albums/jj541/nod7/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-22-2010, 03:34 PM #6
    gl600 [OP]
    gl600 is offline
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    gl600's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Middle East and Canada
    Posts
    156
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    It all sounds good, thanks
    www.flickr.com/photos/artisticisms
    Nikon (and Sigma) Stuff
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
 

 
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Similar Threads

  1. Will a Sigma 70mm f2.8 EX DG Macro Lens work with a Sigma 1.4 Tele Converter?
    By N E Williams in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-19-2010, 01:04 AM
  2. WTB: 50mm f/1.4 Sony and/or 25-70mm f/2.8 Sigma
    By Billhyco in forum Buy and Sell
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-23-2009, 06:14 PM
  3. Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 VS 24-70mm 2.8 VS 28-70mm 2.8
    By anldyxp_gd3 in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-09-2009, 09:31 AM
  4. Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC Macro
    By Showngo in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-25-2007, 05:44 PM
  5. Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 or 24-70mm 2.8?
    By guitarmy in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-02-2007, 11:16 AM

Search tags for this page

sigma 17-50mm vs sigma 17-70mm
,
sigma 17-70 and sigma 18-50
,

sigma 17-70 vs 18-50

,
sigma 17-70 vs sigma 18-50
,

sigma 17-70mm f/2.8 ex dc os hsm

,
sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 dc macro os hsm (nikon)
,
sigma 17-70mm os vs nikon 18-105mm
,
sigma 18-50 17-70
,
sigma 18-50 2.8 ex dc os
,

sigma 18-50 vs 17-70

,
sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 ex dc macro hsm
,
sigma 18-50mm f/2.8-4 review
,
sigma 18-50mm vs 17-70mm os
,
sigma af 24-70mm f/2.8 ex dg macro verses 17 70
,
sigma ex dc macro hsm af-d 18-50mm f/2.8 f2.8 lens for nikon
Click on a term to search for related topics.
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM. Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.