Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
09-18-2010, 06:35 AM #1
Sigma 70-300mm -f/4-5.6 DG Macro Nikon Mount
Hi all
So I bought this lens off ebay as a barely used lens and I'm having real trouble getting the focus to be clear. This is the best I can get the focus at a distance of just over 1.5 meters Yfrog Image : yfrog.com/7fdsc6540ej
compared with the best focus I can get from my 18-55mm kit lens Yfrog Image : yfrog.com/5xdsc6541gj I was wondering if any of you had any idea whether it's been damaged or I'm doing something wrong? I've been using it on a tripod to minimise movement. It uses manual focus only and there doesn't seem to be anything out of the ordinary with the function of the lens so I don't really understand what could be the problem. Not sure if this is the right place to post this but I couldn't see a technical thread. Any help would be great as I don't really want to have wasted money!
Thanks
Yalson
-
09-18-2010 06:35 AM # ADS
-
09-18-2010, 06:53 AM #2TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Tulsa, OK
- Posts
- 1,229
- My Gallery
- (3)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1 times
No the lens just stinks. started with this lens on my d80 a while back. I hated it....
Red edit..... Whoops..... I dont know why but I thought this was talking about the Tamron 70-300... I have the sigma 70-300
APO and it is a much better lens than the tamron. The Tamron Stink the sigma does not.Last edited by Sachphotography; 09-19-2010 at 06:55 PM.
-
09-18-2010, 10:58 AM #3Keeper of the Padlocks Site Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- UK - England
- Posts
- 17,770
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1694 times
Well there are better lenses out there but it should certainly not be as bad as you are showing in that shot. I am inclined to think that you either have a damaged version or that the lens is out of sync with your camera body (meaning that it might be fine and sharp on the original owners camera but not upon your own body).
Sadly fixing either way would cost you and I would expect that the cost might be more than the lenses worth even if bought new.How to get critique on your photography!
Photo of the Month May Nominations
Vote for your photo of the month for April
The Mentor Scheme mentoring on TPF all are welcome to read and apply
Best photos on the net!
well at least I like to think so - sometimes
-
09-19-2010, 06:35 PM #4I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Troll, Wisconsin
- Posts
- 702
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1 times
+1 for the lens just absolutely sucking, it's OK for macro but anything else it fails utterly at.
Don't feed the trolls.
-
09-19-2010, 06:45 PM #5Keeper of the Padlocks Site Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- UK - England
- Posts
- 17,770
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1694 times
*begs to differ just a little
*

All available sizes | IMG_0285 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
All available sizes | IMG_0271 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
All available sizes | IMG_0323 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
As I said there is better out there and there are other options, but for it price and position its a decent performer with the APO version being a noticeable cut above the one I was using there.How to get critique on your photography!
Photo of the Month May Nominations
Vote for your photo of the month for April
The Mentor Scheme mentoring on TPF all are welcome to read and apply
Best photos on the net!
well at least I like to think so - sometimes
-
09-19-2010, 06:55 PM #6TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Tulsa, OK
- Posts
- 1,229
- My Gallery
- (3)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1 times
-
09-20-2010, 05:12 PM #7I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Troll, Wisconsin
- Posts
- 702
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1 times
idk haven't had good experiences with mine..
Don't feed the trolls.
-
09-20-2010, 05:19 PM #8Keeper of the Padlocks Site Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- UK - England
- Posts
- 17,770
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 1694 times
I found that when I used it it gave far better performance when I was using a support - a beanbag on the ground; monopod; tripod (I was using a cheap £15 one at the time) - anything to help eliminate handshake really made a massive difference at the long end of the lens. Good holding technique and keeping fast shutter speed (ideally 1/420sec or faster) would also greatly improve ones results.
How to get critique on your photography!
Photo of the Month May Nominations
Vote for your photo of the month for April
The Mentor Scheme mentoring on TPF all are welcome to read and apply
Best photos on the net!
well at least I like to think so - sometimes
-
09-22-2010, 09:24 AM #9I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- NEPA
- Posts
- 710
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
Yalson, I have read about a similar issue to what you are experiencing. I have not used this lens personally but I have read the the mounting area on this lens is detachable. From somebody else experience they screwed off the rear section and moderately tight screwed it back on and this solved the focusing issues. Give it a try maybe this will be the solution for you to.
Watch His Videos : Dom Bower
"No,I am *** *** ***,and because I have mastered photography over the past 50 years,I can nail exposure,white balance,composition and focusing,and therefore do not see the need for Raw,and all the processing needed, etspecially (sic) for such a small pittance per download-It just ain't cost-effective.I can,and do,get results using a point and shoot,where a lot of you struggle with the best equipment available. Regards, ***"
Similar Threads
-
WANTED>>Sigma 120-300mm NON-DG 4 Nikon mount
By earthguy00 in forum Buy and SellReplies: 0Last Post: 05-27-2010, 08:30 AM -
FS: Sigma APO DG 70-300mm (Nikon Mount)
By silentnoise in forum Buy and SellReplies: 3Last Post: 04-24-2010, 06:07 AM -
FS: Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Canon mount.
By Jaszek in forum Buy and SellReplies: 1Last Post: 09-10-2009, 11:40 AM -
Nikkor 70-300mm 1:4-5.6G or SIGMA 70-300MM F4-5.6 DG MACRO NIKON
By AnthonyCorbo in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 15Last Post: 12-18-2008, 01:39 PM -
FS: Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 DG Macro AF Sony/Minolta Maxxum mount
By JustJoey in forum Buy and SellReplies: 0Last Post: 02-12-2007, 01:08 PM
Search tags for this page
review sigma 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 apo dg macro
,sigma (nikonmount) 70-300mm f4-5.6 apo dg macro
,sigma (nikonmount) 70-300mm f4-5.6 dg marco
,sigma (nikonmount)70 - 300mm f4-5.6 dg marco
,sigma 70 300 f3-5
,sigma 70-300/4-5.6 apo dg macro (nikon)
,sigma 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 apo macro review
,sigma 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 apodg
,sigma 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 dg
,sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 dg macro
,sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 apo dg macro - nikon
,sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 apo dg macro nikon
,sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 dg macro for nikon
,sigma af 70-300mm 1/4-5.6 apo dg macro super ii
,sigma apo dg 70-300 macro nikon
Click on a term to search for related topics.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote




