Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    338
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    7 times

    Nikon 35mm 1.8 VS 50mm 1.8

    I miss my 50mm 1.8 something awful and now i see the 35mm 1.8 is a decent price and i read the all might ken rockwell review and it saying it was good and all but i wanted the opinions of some that may have it on here


    I like the 35mm focal length but just wondering if it is as good as the 50mm quality wise.



  2. #2
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    63
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    I have the 50 f/1.8 and I wish that I would have gotten the 35. The quality is still there on the 35 and it also has an internal focus ring so it is super quiet. what are you planning on shooting?

  3. #3
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    indianapolis
    Posts
    2,319
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    356 times
    im not an expert on glass. but i just picked up the 35mm 1.8 and have really enjoyed it so far. quick focus. seems worlds better then the kit lens. focal lenth just seemed better for me then the 50. but this is comeing from an amature.
    Nikon D7000/D300 with 24-70 F/2.8, 70-200 F/2.8, Nikon 35mm F/1.8, Nikon SB900 several other flashes and stuff.

  4. #4
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,902
    My Gallery
    (15)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    128 times
    35mm cost twice as much, but overall is a more "normal" focal length for aps sized sensors.

    Keep in mind that f1.8 on a shorter focal length won't give you as narrow of DOF as it does with a 50mm.

    If you miss your 50mm, why not just buy another one.

  5. #5
    Been spending a lot of time on here!
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    147
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    0 times
    I have the 35mm, along with the 18-55 and 55-200, and it's by far my favorite lens to use when I'm not trying to shoot something needing 200m etc.

    It has really nice bokeh, but I've not truly explored the possibilities there, do a search on Flickr for the 35 and 50, see if you like what you see.

  6. #6
    I spend too much of my life on TPF!
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    780
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    29 times
    Having both the 50 1.8 and the 35 1.8, the 35 gets far more use than the 50.

    It's silent, has a lens hood, is a better walk-around focal length...it's just more useful for me.

    My $0.02 YMMV

  7. #7
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    4,031
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Liked
    222 times
    Ive got both lenses as well. I use them both equally. Sometimes I find that the 50 is too long, so I use the 35. But the opposite is also true with having the 35 being a tad too short sometimes. The 50 is a great portrait lens, it gives excellent bokeh. I can give you sample images if youd like, but I doubt youll find too much difference in optical quality. The 50 is near quiet focusing as well, but not as quiet as the 35. I can barely tell if it actually is focusing sometimes because I cannot hear it. In real life shooting, however, this is not a huge deal. The 50 is still super quiet. The lens hood is a plus, but not a must. The 50 feels like it has a better build quality, but the 35 is no slouch.

    In all, both are great lenses. You really could benefit from both in different ways, and there really is no say-so answer here. Mainly, you have to choose which focal length youd prefer and go for that. Other than that, there arent many differences to really worry over besides the extra $100 for AF-S.

    Mark
    NIKON: D800 || D3200IR || 50mm F/1.8G || 80-200mm F/2.8D || 300mm F/4.0 AF-s
    SIGMA: 85mm F/1.4 || 180mm F/3.5 Macro
    TOKINA: 16-28mm F/2.8

    **Photography Facebook Page**

    The Journey of One Lens Across the USA - Round 2

  8. #8
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Portland,Or.
    Posts
    1,001
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    79 times
    Yep find times indoors and tight spaces the 50mm is just too cramped.
    Starting out would recommend the 35mm first.
    .
    Present Kit: D90 with MB-D80 grip 35mm f1.8G AF-S Sigma 10-20 Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G AF-S VR

    My Portfolio
    My Flickr
    My D40/D60 Blog

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    488
    My Gallery
    (0)
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Liked
    7 times
    i have the 50mm and i love it for up close n portraits. its very sharp. i have not worked with the 35 but i know it more expensive and nikon would not charge us for something that wasnt needed. personally id have to play with one first.

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Nikon 35mm 1.8 VS 50mm 1.8
    By Lunchbox in forum Digital Discussion & Q&A
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-20-2010, 10:57 AM
  2. WTB 35mm 1.8 ot 50mm 1.8 Nikon
    By WowIshDanny in forum Buy and Sell
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-11-2010, 04:00 PM
  3. 35mm 1.8 vs 50mm 1.4 Nikon DX
    By pokopelo in forum Photography Beginners' Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-14-2010, 01:51 PM
  4. Nikon 50mm f/1.8 or 35mm f/1.8
    By avilamillar in forum Photography Equipment & Products
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-07-2009, 04:34 PM
  5. Wanted: Nikon AF-S DX 35mm 1.8 or AF 50mm 1.8 (D)
    By MadisonWI in forum Buy and Sell
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-08-2009, 10:15 PM

Search tags for this page

50mm 1.8 vs 35mm 1.8
,
50mm vs 35mm comparison
,
compare nikon 35mm 1.8 to 50mm 1.8
,
ken rockwell nikon 50mm 1.8
,

nikon 35 1.8 vs 50 1.8

,
nikon 35 vs 50
,
nikon 35mm 1.8 vs 50mm 1.8 ken rockwell
,
nikon 35mm vs 50mm ken rockwell
,
nikon 50 1.8 or 35 1.8
,
nikon 50mm 1.8 vs 35mm 1.8
Click on a term to search for related topics.