Cokin Z or P for 17-35?

[Markw]

I understand. I mainly need the 17mm for use with the ND+GND. Plus, the filter set is just as usable with all the rest of the range as well.

Mark

[Ads]

[HughGuessWho]

Not so fast there Little Ranger. One thing that didn't get mentioned. No all filters work well with wide/ultrawides. CPOL for example. The FOV is wider than the effective coverage from the filter. Sort of like looking at a TN monitor screen from the side. You need to keep that in mind as well.

Well, I can tell you with 100% certainty, I use that combination on a 10-20 and have zero issues.

[Markw]

Not so fast there Little Ranger. One thing that didn't get mentioned. No all filters work well with wide/ultrawides. CPOL for example. The FOV is wider than the effective coverage from the filter. Sort of like looking at a TN monitor screen from the side. You need to keep that in mind as well.

Well, I can tell you with 100% certainty, I use that combination on a 10-20 and have zero issues.

The 10-20 is a DX lens. If you're shooting canon, that's 16mm at its widest end. So, my 17-35 should be fine.

Mark

[gryphonslair99]

Not so fast there Little Ranger. One thing that didn't get mentioned. No all filters work well with wide/ultrawides. CPOL for example. The FOV is wider than the effective coverage from the filter. Sort of like looking at a TN monitor screen from the side. You need to keep that in mind as well.

Well, I can tell you with 100% certainty, I use that combination on a 10-20 and have zero issues.

Please post an example. I would like to see a good ground sky shot with even blues in the sky with a CPL at 10mm. I had issues on my 10-20 and now on my 11-16 at 10/11mm with a CPOL.