Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    french lick IN
    Posts
    88
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times

    Canon 28-105 vs. Canon 28-135

    i need help deciding witch lens to get for my elan 7ne
    Canon EF 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM or the Canon EF 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS USM

    anyone who has one of these, info on sharpness and focus speed and quality
    would be greatly appreciated


    thank you very much
    latham james
    Canon EOS Rebel GII
    Canon 28-90mm f/4.0-5.6
    Canon 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6
    Canon 50mm 1.8
    and my 120 brownie cam



  2. #2
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    2,078
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    1 times
    I've used both and I prefer the 28-135. The image stabilization is nice in darker places, the lens is bigger and has a better build quality. The 28-105 feels cheaper and small.

  3. #3
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    french lick IN
    Posts
    88
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    thanks man
    so is the 28-135 a pretty good lens out of all or just compared to the 28-105
    Canon EOS Rebel GII
    Canon 28-90mm f/4.0-5.6
    Canon 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6
    Canon 50mm 1.8
    and my 120 brownie cam

  4. #4
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    2,078
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    1 times
    That really depends on what type of photos you plan on taking on how much quality you want.

    It's not a professional quality lens and the main problem I had was that it was f/3.5-5.6.


    Here are some reviews
    http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/s...&cat=27&page=1
    http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/s...&cat=27&page=3

    Just out of curiosity, if you already have a 28-90 why also get a 28-135?

  5. #5
    No longer a newbie, moving up!
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    french lick IN
    Posts
    88
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    0 times
    im more of a outdoors waterfall backwoods kindof photographer
    hmm the 3.5 dosent bother me very much my other lens are slower than that

    and im wanting to get a better lens because the 28-90 is horribly loud and slow.
    Canon EOS Rebel GII
    Canon 28-90mm f/4.0-5.6
    Canon 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6
    Canon 50mm 1.8
    and my 120 brownie cam

  6. #6
    TPF Junkie!
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    2,078
    My Gallery
    (0)
    Liked
    1 times
    Quote Originally Posted by lathamemmons
    im more of a outdoors waterfall backwoods kindof photographer
    hmm the 3.5 dosent bother me very much my other lens are slower than that

    and im wanting to get a better lens because the 28-90 is horribly loud and slow.
    Ok that works then. For outdoor stuff 3.5 should be plenty.

  7. #7
    Iron Flatline
    Guest
    It's a good lens. It was my daily work horse for 4 years, and then started feeling tired in terms of its action. But the focus remained quick enough, and the sharpness was good enough for me.

    Of course, Canon makes a 24-105 1:2.8 L lens that costs a LOT more, but is unBELIEVABLY!! good.

 

 

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-22-2011, 07:54 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-26-2010, 09:12 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-04-2009, 01:33 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-20-2007, 04:45 PM

Search tags for this page

28-105 vs 28-135

,

28-135 vs 28-105

,
canon 24 105 vs 28 135
,
canon 24-105 vs 28-105
,

canon 24-105 vs 28-135

,

canon 28-105 vs 24-105

,

canon 28-105 vs 28-135

,

canon 28-135 vs 24-105

,

canon 28-135 vs 28-105

,
canon ef 28-105 vs 28-135
Click on a term to search for related topics.