Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: The different rebel models.
-
04-18-2007, 06:38 PM #1No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- NY
- Posts
- 75
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
The different rebel models.
I'm taking the plunge and getting a DSLR. The rebel seems like a good place to start but i'm unsure about all the different models. The 6.3 mp rebel is about 400 body, the 8mp xt is 500 for just the body, and the 10.1 xti is 675. Money is deffinetly an issue right now and i really want to put as much as i can towards lens over body. I shoot primarily surf photography so a 200 mm (at least) and F 2.8 is going to hurt. So my struggle right now is what body to get. If i get the xti i'm going to end up with a 70-300 4-5.6 which i hear bad things about. If i go less on the body i will be able to put down 500 dollars for a nice 200 prime lens. Advice?
-
04-18-2007 06:38 PM # ADS
-
04-18-2007, 07:22 PM #2TPF Junkie!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
- Posts
- 1,527
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 3 times
I am really happy with the XT. The Original D Rebel has a USB 1 connection jack so you'd want a card reader. It also has a small buffer and more basic proccessor. Only 4 image bursts........
The XT makes me really happy and I love it. Very mid range. Has the things lacking in the original D rebel, lacks the things the Xti has listed below.
The XTi has the most advanced AF system of them all, best burst shooting (longest buffer NOT faster contrary to popular belief). Looks nicest, and has the largest screen.KEEP THIS IN MIND IF I CRITIQUE YOUR PHOTO
This was an open minded opinion and I tried to make it more meaningful than just tearing the photo apart. I simply highlight what I find to be a strength or a weakness that enhances or degrades the quality of an image. I want it to be clear that I respect your right to agree or disagree with my viewpoints, but hope that they may have given you some insight or further understanding when you compared and contrasted my views with your own.
-
04-18-2007, 07:38 PM #3alter ego: Analog Matt
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 5,346
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 2 times
The lens is very important, and in most cases, more important than the body, but I think for surf photography you are going to want at least a certain amount of the responsiveness from the camera. I think this puts the rebel (300D) out of the game. It's got a slow start up time, and recovery time, and a small buffer. You'll be wishing you had a faster camera the day you get it. The image quality is superb, but I think you have a little more to think about since your subjects aren't trees in a wide angle landscape.
-
04-18-2007, 08:49 PM #4No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- NY
- Posts
- 75
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
Hmmm, It looks like the best bet is to go in the middle with the XT and try to put together enough money for a good lens. There aren't too many middle grounds in the world of photography equipment
-
04-19-2007, 05:31 AM #5alter ego: Analog Matt
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 5,346
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
- Liked
- 2 times
Photography is expensive, no way around that.
-
04-19-2007, 11:10 AM #6
IF you need to shoot surfing you are not going to live with the slow burst mode of the entry level rebel... you will miss tons of great shots...
I would pick up a slightly used 20D with a warranty from a reilable source.
You wont be dissapointed with the extra options. Or else you may outgrow the original rebel in a matter of months and for only a few hundred more you could of started out with a pro camera.....
If you wont shoot a lot of sports, then the rebel is fine !!!!
-
04-19-2007, 11:28 AM #7No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- NY
- Posts
- 75
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
The camera is going to be primarily for surf photography. I'm not really into sequences and the 200 mm lens isn't going to make traditional "action" surf shots anyway. But i do understand the benifits of the 20D. I've also heard that many of the 20D's have technical issues. And yes, photography is expensive, but its an expense i'm willing to take now. Thanks for the input.
-
04-19-2007, 04:48 PM #8
there was an initial batch of 20D's like 2.5 years ago that was bad, but they have mostly been recalled and fixed I believe...
If the shutter has more than 1,000 shots on it and its running fine, then you have a good one.. IF not chances are the owner had it fixed anyways for free..
-
04-19-2007, 07:54 PM #9I spend too much of my life on TPF!
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 651
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
I second the 20D recommendation. It is so much easier to use and takes the abuse with stride. I have the 350d/xt as a back up camera and I always feel like its slowing me down. Plus the 20D feels a bit more balanced with a big lens.
-
04-23-2007, 12:55 PM #10TPF Noob!
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Spring, TX
- Posts
- 11
- My Gallery
- (0)
- My Photos Are OK to Edit
- Liked
- 0 times
XT vs XTi
I had the XT and found it to be a good body. However, most of my shots are taken at soccer games or track meets so a good autofocus system is important as well. When I found out the XTi had the same 9 point autofocus system as the 20D (along with the larger LCD and more MP), I had to have it!
I have found that, indeed, the XTi seems to have a more accurate focus system. That should be key to your decision if you're doing surfing pics. I combined the XTi with a 70-200mm F2.8 IS USM and have really been pleased with the results.
The one thing the 20D has that you may be interested in is 5 fps continuous. The XTi will do 3.5 fps on a good day. That's enough for me but there have been times when I wished I had the 5-8 fps capability. But, that's another program.
If your budget allows for the XTi, get it!RmcLain3,
Canon EOS 40D \ Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM \ Canon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM \ Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical \ Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II \ Canon BG-E2N Battery Grip \ Canon RS80-N3 Remote Switch \ Canon Speedlite 430EX \ SanDisk UltraII 1GB, 2GB & Kingston 4GB \ Kenko 1.4X Teleconverter \ Cheap Tripod & Giottos Monopod \ Breitling Aeromarine SuperOcean Steelfish \ Colt Commander XSE .45 Just in Case
Similar Threads
-
video portrait of katie, with ford models & click models
By dannowatts in forum People PhotographyReplies: 0Last Post: 02-13-2011, 05:36 PM -
my models
By white in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 12-22-2010, 02:12 PM -
My Models....
By Munky in forum Photography Beginners' ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 04-26-2009, 01:03 PM -
Digital EOS Rebel VS. Film EOS Rebel
By fowweezer in forum Photography Equipment & ProductsReplies: 6Last Post: 06-01-2005, 01:55 PM -
models
By christopher in forum Graphics Programs and Photo GalleryReplies: 5Last Post: 03-09-2004, 10:09 PM
Search tags for this page
rebel models different
Click on a term to search for related topics.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
