Amber and Kyle's Wedding

bennielou · 12-15-2009, 10:26 AM

Nikkor · 12-15-2009, 11:00 AM

A few things: The detail shots at the beginning could be a little tweeked, just to give it a little extra. Like the shoes, a vignette maybe, or something just a little more.

Overall I liked your detail shots. They're some of my favorite to shoot.

The rings are blurry, I'd say your focus was off, of you needed a macro lens.

Also, what lighting did you use? I love the lighting cast on the wedding cake, gives it more drama.

I really liked the pictures, and that dress is gorgeous!

IgsEMT · 12-15-2009, 11:59 AM

Overall, pretty good job. Group shots a bit off - lighting is very centered and direct. Use an assistant and/or strobe/room lights. It's an investment that will glorify your images (you already have a good eye) and will further improve your creative side.

SrBiscuit · 12-15-2009, 01:09 PM

i agree....nice shots overall, but the lighting seems a bit harsh on the ones of people.

rangerrick9211 · 12-15-2009, 05:47 PM

Overall, excellent.

And, how did you do the lighting on the wedding cake?

bennielou · 12-15-2009, 05:47 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by IgsEMT

Overall, pretty good job. Group shots a bit off - lighting is very centered and direct. Use an assistant and/or strobe/room lights. It's an investment that will glorify your images (you already have a good eye) and will further improve your creative side.

Thanks. I have two assistants.

bennielou · 12-15-2009, 05:48 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by rangerrick9211

Overall, excellent.

And, how did you do the lighting on the wedding cake?

No flash. :-) Total ambient using available light.

rangerrick9211 · 12-23-2009, 01:55 PM

Oh, and WHOOOP!!!

-Class of 2010

bennielou · 12-28-2009, 09:40 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by rangerrick9211

Oh, and WHOOOP!!!

-Class of 2010

Hi Ranger,
Not sure what the "Oh Whoop" is about.... I was advised to use assistants, and responded that I have two, and furthermore thanked the poster.

I've been shooting weddings for some years now, and I have found that assistants are indeed much needed. First of all, I have way to much gear to lug around on my own. Secondly, I can't handle all the lighting, posing, and shooting by myself in a timely fashion on my own. And lastly, the weddings I normally work are very large (between 150-350 guests) and I can't simultaniously take photos at the church of the afterformals, and at the same time be at a venue across town taking photos of the reception area before it is trashed. It's truly a group effort. The people working with me are well paid and team members. Also, the people working with me have worked with me for years.

So anyway, back to the "Oh and Whoop" comment...I'm not exacty sure how that applies. I only responded to a poster.

If you were referring to shooting ambient light on a shot or two, it's only because of fast glass and years of doing this. I'm really confused by the comment. :-)

Rosshole · 12-28-2009, 12:21 PM

I am assuming that he is also attending the same school as the newlyweds.

bennielou · 12-28-2009, 12:30 PM

Could be. :-)
The bride however is a vet, and the groom works on Wall Street. :-)

I think he took it as being arrogant, which I didn't mean to do. To some people I guess, having two full time helpers would sound like a brag. To others it would be a needed thing. I guess it would depend on the photog, the amount of people involved (both the wedding party and the guests).

I didn't start out with massive wedding parties and guests, and maybe they aren't to that point yet. I don't know. When I first started out it was just me, myself, and I.

Nowdays, I need assistants to stay competitive. I'm in a brutal market, and I'm charging enough to have to put up a good fight.

Being a beginner on this forum is not tantimount to being new in business. And offering crit is not equal to knowing what you are doing.

I'm used to the boards and I like them because I get good feedback. I notice that the newer the photog the more feedback, but that's cool too. I just have to cut through it. :-)

Thanks for totally getting it!

Rosshole · 12-28-2009, 12:33 PM

Ah, I guess that the Texas A & M patch is throwing some off.

bennielou · 12-28-2009, 12:43 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Rosshole

Ah, I guess that the Texas A & M patch is throwing some off.

Yes, I believe it's the A&M vortex. :-)

Rosshole · 12-28-2009, 12:55 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by bennielou

Quote: Originally Posted by Rosshole

Ah, I guess that the Texas A & M patch is throwing some off.

Yes, I believe it's the A&M vortex. :-)

You completely lost me.... (and others I presume)

SrBiscuit · 12-28-2009, 03:13 PM

seeing that rangerrick is in TX, and the grooms cake is an A&M cake...that's where the whoop and class of 2010 came from. i can almost bet.

but like others, now i am hopelessly lost

12-15-2009, 10:26 AM	#1
bennielou I spend too much of my life on TPF! Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 331 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Amber and Kyle's Wedding

12-15-2009, 11:00 AM	#2
Nikkor Been spending a lot of time on here! Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 244 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts My Gallery: (0)	A few things: The detail shots at the beginning could be a little tweeked, just to give it a little extra. Like the shoes, a vignette maybe, or something just a little more. Overall I liked your detail shots. They're some of my favorite to shoot. The rings are blurry, I'd say your focus was off, of you needed a macro lens. Also, what lighting did you use? I love the lighting cast on the wedding cake, gives it more drama. I really liked the pictures, and that dress is gorgeous! __________________ Nikon D60 Nikkor 15-35mm F3.5-5.6 Nikkor 18-105mm F3.5-5.6 Pending: SB-600 Pending: 50mm F1.8

12-15-2009, 01:09 PM	#4
SrBiscuit TPF Junkie! Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: NH Posts: 1,709 My Photos Are OK to Edit Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts My Gallery: (0)	i agree....nice shots overall, but the lighting seems a bit harsh on the ones of people. __________________ D1x \| D1H \| Gripped D40 \| 18-55 \| 55-200 \| 55-200VR \| 18-70 \| 80-205 \| SB-600 and cable \| Cactus V4s \| quantaray pz-1 dsz \| Lowepro slingshot 100 \| love for photography .:. www.reactwithin.com .:. http://www.modelmayhem.com/1364912 Before posting, please read, understand, and follow "THE PACT".

12-15-2009, 05:47 PM	#5
rangerrick9211 No longer a newbie, moving up! Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: College Station, TX Posts: 54 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Overall, excellent. And, how did you do the lighting on the wedding cake? __________________ "Above all, I know that life for a photographer cannot be a matter of indifference" - Robert Frank

12-23-2009, 01:55 PM	#8
rangerrick9211 No longer a newbie, moving up! Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: College Station, TX Posts: 54 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Oh, and WHOOOP!!! -Class of 2010 __________________ "Above all, I know that life for a photographer cannot be a matter of indifference" - Robert Frank

12-15-2009, 11:59 AM	#3
IgsEMT TPF Junkie! Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: NYC Posts: 1,373 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 66 Times in 63 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Overall, pretty good job. Group shots a bit off - lighting is very centered and direct. Use an assistant and/or strobe/room lights. It's an investment that will glorify your images (you already have a good eye) and will further improve your creative side.

12-15-2009, 05:47 PM	#6
bennielou I spend too much of my life on TPF! Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 331 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Quote: Originally Posted by IgsEMT Overall, pretty good job. Group shots a bit off - lighting is very centered and direct. Use an assistant and/or strobe/room lights. It's an investment that will glorify your images (you already have a good eye) and will further improve your creative side. Thanks. I have two assistants.

12-15-2009, 05:48 PM	#7
bennielou I spend too much of my life on TPF! Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 331 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Quote: Originally Posted by rangerrick9211 Overall, excellent. And, how did you do the lighting on the wedding cake? No flash. :-) Total ambient using available light.

12-28-2009, 09:40 AM	#9
bennielou I spend too much of my life on TPF! Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 331 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Quote: Originally Posted by rangerrick9211 Oh, and WHOOOP!!! -Class of 2010 Hi Ranger, Not sure what the "Oh Whoop" is about.... I was advised to use assistants, and responded that I have two, and furthermore thanked the poster. I've been shooting weddings for some years now, and I have found that assistants are indeed much needed. First of all, I have way to much gear to lug around on my own. Secondly, I can't handle all the lighting, posing, and shooting by myself in a timely fashion on my own. And lastly, the weddings I normally work are very large (between 150-350 guests) and I can't simultaniously take photos at the church of the afterformals, and at the same time be at a venue across town taking photos of the reception area before it is trashed. It's truly a group effort. The people working with me are well paid and team members. Also, the people working with me have worked with me for years. So anyway, back to the "Oh and Whoop" comment...I'm not exacty sure how that applies. I only responded to a poster. If you were referring to shooting ambient light on a shot or two, it's only because of fast glass and years of doing this. I'm really confused by the comment. :-)

12-28-2009, 12:21 PM	#10
Rosshole No longer a newbie, moving up! Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: WI Posts: 78 My Photos Are OK to Edit Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post My Gallery: (0)	I am assuming that he is also attending the same school as the newlyweds.

12-28-2009, 12:30 PM	#11
bennielou I spend too much of my life on TPF! Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 331 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Could be. :-) The bride however is a vet, and the groom works on Wall Street. :-) I think he took it as being arrogant, which I didn't mean to do. To some people I guess, having two full time helpers would sound like a brag. To others it would be a needed thing. I guess it would depend on the photog, the amount of people involved (both the wedding party and the guests). I didn't start out with massive wedding parties and guests, and maybe they aren't to that point yet. I don't know. When I first started out it was just me, myself, and I. Nowdays, I need assistants to stay competitive. I'm in a brutal market, and I'm charging enough to have to put up a good fight. Being a beginner on this forum is not tantimount to being new in business. And offering crit is not equal to knowing what you are doing. I'm used to the boards and I like them because I get good feedback. I notice that the newer the photog the more feedback, but that's cool too. I just have to cut through it. :-) Thanks for totally getting it! Last edited by bennielou; 12-28-2009 at 12:41 PM.

12-28-2009, 12:33 PM	#12
Rosshole No longer a newbie, moving up! Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: WI Posts: 78 My Photos Are OK to Edit Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post My Gallery: (0)	Ah, I guess that the Texas A & M patch is throwing some off.

12-28-2009, 12:43 PM	#13
bennielou I spend too much of my life on TPF! Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 331 My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts My Gallery: (0)	Quote: Originally Posted by Rosshole Ah, I guess that the Texas A & M patch is throwing some off. Yes, I believe it's the A&M vortex. :-)

12-28-2009, 12:55 PM	#14
Rosshole No longer a newbie, moving up! Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: WI Posts: 78 My Photos Are OK to Edit Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post My Gallery: (0)	Quote: Originally Posted by bennielou Quote: Originally Posted by Rosshole Ah, I guess that the Texas A & M patch is throwing some off. Yes, I believe it's the A&M vortex. :-) You completely lost me.... (and others I presume)

12-28-2009, 03:13 PM	#15
SrBiscuit TPF Junkie! Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: NH Posts: 1,709 My Photos Are OK to Edit Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts My Gallery: (0)	seeing that rangerrick is in TX, and the grooms cake is an A&M cake...that's where the whoop and class of 2010 came from. i can almost bet. but like others, now i am hopelessly lost __________________ D1x \| D1H \| Gripped D40 \| 18-55 \| 55-200 \| 55-200VR \| 18-70 \| 80-205 \| SB-600 and cable \| Cactus V4s \| quantaray pz-1 dsz \| Lowepro slingshot 100 \| love for photography .:. www.reactwithin.com .:. http://www.modelmayhem.com/1364912 Before posting, please read, understand, and follow "THE PACT".

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode