uu

[Overread]

Bitter I haven't removed any posts - I just didn't have anywhere to put these. And I did consult Mark before doing this. The intent was mostly to split his and Skierus critique in a similar manner to that which Cloud used earlier so that they were not falling over each others feet in the single thread.

[TPF Sponsor]

[Derrel]

I appreciate the note of clarification Overread. I don't want anything to do with this thread.

[Bitter Jeweler]

me, me, me, me........

Hey, how did my photo get in this thread?

Because spacefuzzes critique goes against the wishes of the OP who, rather than critiquing images people regularly post for CC in their own threads, decided to make a sub forum for critique within a sub forum for critique, where only the OP's views are valid and should be heard.

I find THAT rather pompous.

[GeorgieGirl]

My head hurts.

[Overread]

My head hurts.

You're not supposed to get the hangover from Friday night until Saturday

[Derrel]

"Excedrin P.M.-- for those butchered thread headaches."

[camz]

[Overread]

Ok lets try again:

Thread 1 - posting photos only for crits: So, you want a brutally honest critique on your photo, huh?

Thread 2 - Mark's Crits Markw brutally honest critiques

Thread 3 - Skieur's Crits Skieur's brutally honest critiques

This thread - junk/a few one off crits from the first thread that had no place in the above three and thus were dumped in here.

Note even if you don't have a subscription to one of the above threads you can go to the Thread Tools option (located on the right hand side of the bar right above the first post on a page) and select the Subscribe to thread option from the list.


for those worried a certain mod has too much forum time - the current biggest choice problem of this mod:
Britannia or Prussia

[kundalini]

Because spacefuzzes critique goes against the wishes of the OP who, rather than critiquing images people regularly post for CC in their own threads, decided to make a sub forum for critique within a sub forum for critique, where only the OP's views are valid and should be heard.

I find THAT rather pompous.

..... and the reason they don't want to re-establish a proper Critique forum was because....... sorry, I forget. Was it so there would not be a dedicated, single source location where people could post a photo for general critique (yes, even from the unwashed multitude), but instead have dedicated critique-ers? And these dedicated, and apparently ambushed, critique-ers (4 I believe) could take the full brunt of the entire site?

Pompous is not the word Bitter. Let me sip on a few shots of tequila tonight and I'll get back with you.

[skieur]

Because spacefuzzes critique goes against the wishes of the OP who, rather than critiquing images people regularly post for CC in their own threads, decided to make a sub forum for critique within a sub forum for critique, where only the OP's views are valid and should be heard.

I find THAT rather pompous.

..... and the reason they don't want to re-establish a proper Critique forum was because....... sorry, I forget. Was it so there would not be a dedicated, single source location where people could post a photo for general critique (yes, even from the unwashed multitude), but instead have dedicated critique-ers? And these dedicated, and apparently ambushed, critique-ers (4 I believe) could take the full brunt of the entire site?

Pompous is not the word Bitter. Let me sip on a few shots of tequila tonight and I'll get back with you.

Clear as mud to everyone, eh,...to both critique eees and critique rrrs!

skieur

[Overread]

Just for the record I've supported the motion to have a critique subsection added/restored. The final say-so however is not my say and I would still remind members that the primary reason we don't have one is due to behaviour problems that occurred when the critique forums were present in the past.