A Few Recent Client Headshots (C&C Appreciated)

[cgipson1]

Like I said, #3 looks overexposed.

.

ANDS!.... one question! Would you have delivered #3 to a client? Seriously?

 

[cgipson1]

Go on.

I don't think that there are "perceived blown" areas. At least not on my screen. I think that there are calibrated monitors and uncalibrated monitors. ;-)

I would say that they're a tad overexposed, but no areas are blown. I compared via my editing station and my phone.

Tyler... would YOU give a client a shot like #3?

 

[Robin Usagani]

I would deliver 3... gosh.. you guys are harsh. These are not "bad". We see a lot of bad photos here on the forum. These aren't in that category.

 

[Ballistics]

I would deliver 3... gosh.. you guys are harsh. These are not "bad". We see a lot of bad photos here on the forum. These aren't in that category.

I don't think I'm harsh.

 

[rexbobcat]

I would deliver 3... gosh.. you guys are harsh. These are not "bad". We see a lot of bad photos here on the forum. These aren't in that category.

But he has a "shadow eye patch."



And he's orange....

 

[Robin Usagani]

I would deliver 3... gosh.. you guys are harsh. These are not "bad". We see a lot of bad photos here on the forum. These aren't in that category.

But he has a "shadow eye patch."



And he's orange....

He is not a whitey like you

 

[o hey tyler]

Tyler... would YOU give a client a shot like #3?

I don't recall discussing whether I'd deliver that to a client or that even being on the table. If there was something I was unsure about, I would consult multiple talented photographers that I know and decide how to proceed from there.

 

[rexbobcat]

He is not a whitey like you

It's my natural defense. Blind the enemy and then flee on my spindly, pale little legs.

 

[Letterbox]

This is getting hilarious.

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

Letterbox, your thread is blown!

 

[MTVision]

Letterbox, your thread is blown!

Wrong Bitter. It's not at 255 yet....

 

[cgipson1]

Tyler... would YOU give a client a shot like #3?

I don't recall discussing whether I'd deliver that to a client or that even being on the table. If there was something I was unsure about, I would consult multiple talented photographers that I know and decide how to proceed from there.

I put it on the table.. because I know you would not deliver a shot like that... No matter how much you argue about it! lol! Of course, we will never get a straight answer on it, will we?

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

 

[rexbobcat]

This is getting hilarious.

Hilariously insightful I assume?

:trollface:

 

[ANDS!]

So you agree with me that they are overexposed.

No. OVerexposed for most people has a very clear meaning. A bit hot in a few places yes; something easily fixed in the space of 30 seconds in Photoshop.

ANDS!.... one question! Would you have delivered #3 to a client? Seriously?

If that's what the client wanted. I would make my own personal tweaks to it, but depending on the level of expertise here and what the person wanted I would have no problem turning that over. As Schwettylens said (I just got that), some of you are being ridiculous in your assessments. Heres how I saw this thread go down:


OP: Started a bidness. Here are some professional jobs.
Chorus: Pro?! Hoo hoo.
OP: This is what the client wanted.
Chorus: Client is foolish. Go read a book.
ANDS: (No text. Just bright light of knowledge shining down)
Chorus: Oh god him again.
OP: What a cluster****.