Another nail in the film coffin

Stephen-colbert-report-excited.gif
 
Film will make a comeback
Digital is just a fad.
 
I'm glad to see that I was gone for like 2 years and the same people are having the same arguments.
 
Who's having an argument?
I can't tell if you're serious. But in fairness, my post probably seemed sarcastic. But in fact, I did find it moderately comforting that Gary's quixotic quest for the proclamation of film superiority, and everybody's arguing with him over it is still running just as strong as ever.
 
Who's having an argument?
I can't tell if you're serious. But in fairness, my post probably seemed sarcastic. But in fact, I did find it moderately comforting that Gary's quixotic quest for the proclamation of film superiority, and everybody's arguing with him over it is still running just as strong as ever.

I was serious.

I recognize that Gary is very enthusiastic and often aggressive in his defense of film. And I know that the film vs digital horse is being flogged as spiritedly as ever in many a forum. But this thread has nothing to do with that dead horse. The OP wasn't about film superiority. It was about the introduction of a new film.

The title, I suspect, was aimed at a few posters like cgw who frequently post articles about how film is dead, deceased, joined the choir invisible. Since it was posted in the Film Photography sub-forum, and it was to share information that we might be interested in, I figure the thread was mostly informative, not argumentative.
 
Who's having an argument?
I can't tell if you're serious. But in fairness, my post probably seemed sarcastic. But in fact, I did find it moderately comforting that Gary's quixotic quest for the proclamation of film superiority, and everybody's arguing with him over it is still running just as strong as ever.

I was serious.

I recognize that Gary is very enthusiastic and often aggressive in his defense of film. And I know that the film vs digital horse is being flogged as spiritedly as ever in many a forum. But this thread has nothing to do with that dead horse. The OP wasn't about film superiority. It was about the introduction of a new film.

The title, I suspect, was aimed at a few posters like cgw who frequently post articles about how film is dead, deceased, joined the choir invisible. Since it was posted in the Film Photography sub-forum, and it was to share information that we might be interested in, I figure the thread was mostly informative, not argumentative.
I'm not looking to cause trouble, it is a brand new film not rebranded
 
I'm not arguing .. I do have a Canon AE-1 .. somewhere ....
 
Relax, they are made by digital coaters, cut by digitally sharpened scissors, packed by digitally controlled packers and shipped by digitally controlled UPS. Lotsa digi here. Nikon will survive, however there will be no peace. Nikon hates things Nikon do not sell.
 
Who's having an argument?
I can't tell if you're serious. But in fairness, my post probably seemed sarcastic. But in fact, I did find it moderately comforting that Gary's quixotic quest for the proclamation of film superiority, and everybody's arguing with him over it is still running just as strong as ever.
He has supporters.
 
Relax, they are made by digital coaters, cut by digitally sharpened scissors, packed by digitally controlled packers and shipped by digitally controlled UPS. Lotsa digi here. Nikon will survive, however there will be no peace. Nikon hates things Nikon do not sell.

Nikon would still be behind if it was not for Sony
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top